Showing 2,379 of 2,379 total issues
Assignment Branch Condition size for update_name is too high. [39.1/15] Open
def update_name
from = params[:id]
to = params[:to]
@source = params[:source] || "edit"
@resource = Resource.find from
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for update_name is too high. [39.1/15] Open
def update_name
from = params[:id]
to = params[:to]
@source = params[:source] || "edit"
@constraint = Constraint.find from
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
File util.rb
has 352 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Util
# From http://mentalized.net/journal/2011/04/14/ruby_how_to_check_if_a_string_is_numeric/
def numeric?(n)
Float(n) != nil rescue false
Method check_drbd_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_drbd_status
# if there are any running drbd resources on this node and a drbdadm command,
# check drbdadm status
# do we need sudo to do it?
me = Socket.gethostname
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
tag.find("button.btn").click(function() {
var username = tag.find("input[name=username]").val();
var password = tag.find("input[name=password]").val();
tag.find('.btn-success').attr('disabled', true);
tag.find('input').attr('disabled', true);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
btn.click(function() {
var username = tag_body.find("input[name=username]").val();
var password = tag_body.find("input[name=password]").val();
tag_body.find('.btn-success').attr('disabled', true);
tag_body.find('input').attr('disabled', true);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 123.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Class ReportsController
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ReportsController < ApplicationController
before_action :login_required
before_action :set_title
before_action :set_record, only: [:show, :destroy, :download, :cache]
before_action :set_transition, only: [:display, :detail, :graph, :logs, :diff, :pefile, :status, :cib]
Function test_check_cluster_configuration
has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def test_check_cluster_configuration(self, ssh):
"""
The test does two things.
First, it checks that the available resources are correct.
Second, that the options of select-type resources are correct.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function AttrList
has 106 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function AttrList(el, options) {
this.$el = $(el);
this.values = this.$el.data('attrlist');
Assignment Branch Condition size for create is too high. [37.6/15] Open
def create
normalize_params! params[:location].permit!
@title = _('Create Location Constraint')
@location = Location.new params[:location].permit!
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for show is too high. [36.48/15] Open
def show
if params[:id].start_with? "@"
name = params[:id][1..-1]
template = Hash.from_xml(Util.safe_x("/usr/sbin/cibadmin", "-l", "--query", "--xpath", "//template[@id='#{name}']"))
Rails.logger.debug "Template: #{template}"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_name
from = params[:id]
to = params[:to]
@source = params[:source] || "edit"
@resource = Resource.find from
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 138.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def update_name
from = params[:id]
to = params[:to]
@source = params[:source] || "edit"
@constraint = Constraint.find from
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 138.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function WizAttrList
has 100 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function WizAttrList(el, options) {
this.$el = $(el);
this.values = this.$el.data('wizattrlist');
this.targets = this.$el.data('wizattrlist-target');
Assignment Branch Condition size for instantiate is too high. [35.86/15] Open
def instantiate(xml)
record = allocate
record.score = xml.attributes["score"] || xml.attributes["kind"] || nil
record.symmetrical = Util.unstring(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Perceived complexity for update_resource_state is too high. [27/7] Open
def update_resource_state(resource, node, instance, state, substate, failed_ops)
# m/s slave state hack (*sigh*)
state = :slave if resource[:is_ms] && state == :started
instances = resource[:instances]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [50/30] Open
def show
respond_to do |format|
format.html do
cmd = "show"
cmd = "show xml" if params[:xml] == "true"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for safe_x is too high. [35.24/15] Open
def safe_x(*cmd)
raise SecurityError, "Util::safe_x called with < 2 args" if cmd.length < 2
Rails.logger.debug "Executing `#{cmd.join(' ')}` through `safe_x`"
pr = IO::pipe # pipe[0] for read, pipe[1] for write
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Function ConstraintList
has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function ConstraintList(el, options) {
this.$el = $(el);
this.values = this.$el.data('constraints');
Method instantiate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def instantiate(xml, state)
record = allocate
record.id = state[:id]
record.xml = xml
record.name = state[:name]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"