Showing 331 of 343 total issues
Class IterationService has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class IterationService
DAYS_IN_WEEK = (1.week / 1.day)
VELOCITY_ITERATIONS = 3
STD_DEV_ITERATIONS = 10
DEFAULT_VELOCITY = 10Function ProjectBoard has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const ProjectBoard = ({
fetchProjectBoard,
projectId,
projectBoard,
closeHistory,- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File project.js has 258 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Cookies from 'js-cookie';
import StoryCollection from '../collections/story_collection';
import UserCollection from '../collections/user_collection';
import Iteration from '../models/iteration';
import ProjectBoard from '../models/projectBoard';Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const search = async (queryParam, projectId) => {
const { data } = await httpService.get(
`/projects/${projectId}/stories?q=${queryParam}`,
{
timeout: 1500,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 83.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
export const getByLabel = async (label, projectId) => {
const { data } = await httpService.get(
`/projects/${projectId}/stories?label=${label}`,
{
timeout: 1500,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 83.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Perceived complexity for from_csv is too high. [12/8] Open
def from_csv(csv_string)
# Eager load this so that we don't have to make multiple db calls when
# searching for users by full name from the CSV.
users = proxy_association.owner.users
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special
case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then
the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity pointsFunction mergeWithFetchedStories has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const mergeWithFetchedStories = (currentStories, fetchedStories) => {
if (Object.values(currentStories).length === 0) {
const firstStoriesById = fetchedStories.stories.allIds.reduce(
(acc, storyId) => {
return {File ProjectBoard.jsx has 255 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import React, { useEffect, useState } from 'react';
import { connect } from 'react-redux';
import {
fetchProjectBoard,
toggleColumn,Method change_archived has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def change_archived(archive = true)
@project = policy_scope(Project).archived.friendly.find(params[:id]) unless @project
authorize @project
result = ProjectOperations::Update.call(- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Complex method ProjectsController#change_archived (41.0) Open
def change_archived(archive = true)
@project = policy_scope(Project).archived.friendly.find(params[:id]) unless @project
authorize @project
result = ProjectOperations::Update.call(- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
File iteration.js has 253 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import moment from 'moment';
import { last, isEmpty } from 'underscore';
import * as Story from './story';
const weeksBetween = (dateA, dateB) =>Complex method ProjectsController#import (39.7) Open
def import
@import_job = session[:import_job]
return if @import_job.blank?
job_result = Rails.cache.read(@import_job[:id])- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const StoryNotes = props => (
<div className="form-group">
<label htmlFor="note">{I18n.t('story.notes')}</label>
<div className="notelist">{renderNotes(props)}</div>
</div>- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
const StoryTasks = props => (
<div className="form-group">
<label htmlFor="tasks">{I18n.t('story.tasks')}</label>
<div className="tasklist checkbox">{renderTasks(props)}</div>
</div>- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 79.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function sortUpdate has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
sortUpdate: function (ev, ui) {
// The target element, i.e. the StoryView.el element
var target = $(ev.target);
// Initially, try and get the id's of the previous and / or next stories- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for merge_story! is too high. [8/6] Open
def merge_story!(activity)
return if subject_type != 'Story' # story only
return if subject_id != activity.subject_id # only merge the exact same story change
return if updated_at > activity.updated_at # only merge from future changes
return if activity.subject_changes.blank?- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Integrations
module Slack
class Service
def self.send(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username, message)
self.new(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username).send(message)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
module Integrations
module Mattermost
class Service
def self.send(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username, message)
self.new(private_uri, project_channel, bot_username).send(message)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 69.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function initialize has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
initialize: function (options) {
_.extend(this, _.pick(options, 'isSearchResult'));
_.bindAll(
this,Complex method ActivityPresenter#predicate (38.4) Open
def predicate
return '' unless action == 'update'
changes = subject_changes.keys.reject { |key| IGNORED_FIELDS.include?(key) }.map do |key|
case key
when 'documents_attributes' then document_changes subject_changes[key]- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Flog calculates the ABC score for methods. The ABC score is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions.
You can read more about ABC metrics or the flog tool