ComplianceAsCode/content

View on GitHub
ssg/build_remediations.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage
D
68%

File build_remediations.py has 469 lines of code (exceeds 400 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function

import sys
import os
Severity: Minor
Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 3 hrs to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function expand_xccdf_subs. (12)
    Open

    def expand_xccdf_subs(fix, remediation_type):
        """Expand the respective populate keywords of each
        remediation type with an <xccdf:sub> element
    
        This routine translates any instance of the '`type`-populate' keyword in
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function expand_xccdf_subs has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def expand_xccdf_subs(fix, remediation_type):
        """Expand the respective populate keywords of each
        remediation type with an <xccdf:sub> element
    
        This routine translates any instance of the '`type`-populate' keyword in
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function inject_package_facts_task has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def inject_package_facts_task(self, parsed_snippet):
            """ Injects a package_facts task only if
                the snippet has a task with a when clause with ansible_facts.packages,
                and the snippet doesn't already have a package_facts task
            """
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function parse_from_file_with_jinja has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def parse_from_file_with_jinja(self, env_yaml, cpe_platforms):
            self.local_env_yaml.update(env_yaml)
            result = super(BashRemediation, self).parse_from_file_with_jinja(
                self.local_env_yaml, cpe_platforms)
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function get_rule_dir_remediations has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def get_rule_dir_remediations(dir_path, remediation_type, product=None):
        """
        Gets a list of remediations of type remediation_type contained in a
        rule directory. If product is None, returns all such remediations.
        If product is not None, returns applicable remediations in order of
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function split_remediation_content_and_metadata has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 7 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def split_remediation_content_and_metadata(fix_file):
        remediation_contents = []
        config = defaultdict(lambda: None)
    
        # Assignment automatically escapes shell characters for XML
    Severity: Minor
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "573" or change one of the implementations.
    Open

            return
    Severity: Major
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py by sonar-python

    Having two branches in the same if structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.

    Noncompliant Code Example

    if 0 <= a < 10:
        do_the_thing()
    elif 10 <= a < 20:
        do_the_other_thing()
    elif 20 <= a < 50:
        do_the_thing()  # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition
    else:
        do_the_rest()
    
    b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
    

    Compliant Solution

    if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50):
        do_the_thing()
    elif 10 <= a < 20:
        do_the_other_thing()
    else:
        do_the_rest()
    
    b = 4
    

    or

    if 0 <= a < 10:
        do_the_thing()
    elif 10 <= a < 20:
        do_the_other_thing()
    elif 20 <= a < 50:
        do_the_third_thing()
    else:
        do_the_rest()
    
    b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
    

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            if file_ext == ext and rules.applies_to_product(file_name, product):
                # rules.applies_to_product ensures we only have three entries:
                # 1. shared
                # 2. <product>
                # 3. <product><version>
    Severity: Major
    Found in ssg/build_remediations.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
    ssg/rules.py on lines 85..105
    ssg/rules.py on lines 136..142

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 50.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status