Function frontendDivisionShow has a Cognitive Complexity of 324 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionShow($Id = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klassenansicht', 'Übersicht');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File Frontend.php has 2079 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace SPHERE\Application\Education\Lesson\Division;
use SPHERE\Application\Api\Education\Division\StudentGroupSelect;
use SPHERE\Application\Api\Education\Division\StudentSelect;Method frontendDivisionShow has 424 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionShow($Id = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klassenansicht', 'Übersicht');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));Method frontendCreateLevelDivision has 179 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCreateLevelDivision($Level = null, $Division = null, $Year = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klassen', 'Aktuelle Übersicht');
Method frontendSubjectTeacherAdd has 163 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectTeacherAdd($Id = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $SubjectTeacherId = null, $PersonId = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {Method frontendTeacherAdd has 139 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendTeacherAdd($Id = null, $TeacherId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {Method frontendCustodyAdd has 139 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCustodyAdd($Id = null, $PersonId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {Function frontendCopyDivision has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCopyDivision($Id = null, $Division = null, $Level = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Kopieren');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendSubjectGroupAdd has 113 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupAdd($Id = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $Group = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Fach-Gruppen', 'Übersicht');
Function frontendCreateLevelDivision has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCreateLevelDivision($Level = null, $Division = null, $Year = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klassen', 'Aktuelle Übersicht');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendCopyDivision has 106 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCopyDivision($Id = null, $Division = null, $Level = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Kopieren');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));Function frontendSubjectAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectAdd($Id = null, $IsHasGradingView = false, $Data = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendSubjectStudentAdd has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectStudentAdd(
$Id = null,
$DivisionSubjectId = null,
$Data = null
) {Method frontendSubjectAdd has 87 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectAdd($Id = null, $IsHasGradingView = false, $Data = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {Method frontendDivisionDestroy has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionDestroy($Id = null, $Confirm = false)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Löschen');
if ($Id && ( $tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id) )) {Method frontendSubjectGroupChange has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupChange($Id = null, $SubjectId = null, $DivisionId = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $Group = null)
{
if ($Id === null || $SubjectId === null || $DivisionId === null || $DivisionSubjectId === null) {
$Stage = new Stage('Fach-Gruppen', 'Bearbeiten');Method frontendDivisionChange has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionChange($Id = null, $Division = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Bearbeiten');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));Method formLevelDivision has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formLevelDivision(TblLevel $tblLevel = null, TblDivision $tblDivision = null, $future = false)
{
$tblLevelAll = Division::useService()->getLevelAll();
$acNameAll = array();Function frontendSubjectTeacherAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectTeacherAdd($Id = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $SubjectTeacherId = null, $PersonId = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendSubjectTeacherShow has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectTeacherShow($Id)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Lehrer', 'Auswahl');
$tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);Function frontendSubjectGroupChange has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupChange($Id = null, $SubjectId = null, $DivisionId = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $Group = null)
{
if ($Id === null || $SubjectId === null || $DivisionId === null || $DivisionSubjectId === null) {
$Stage = new Stage('Fach-Gruppen', 'Bearbeiten');- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function frontendSubjectTeacherShow has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectTeacherShow($Id)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Lehrer', 'Auswahl');
$tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function frontendDivisionDestroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionDestroy($Id = null, $Confirm = false)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Löschen');
if ($Id && ( $tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id) )) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method formSubjectGroupAdd has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formSubjectGroupAdd($IsSekTwo)
{
if ($IsSekTwo) {
return new Form(Function frontendTeacherAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendTeacherAdd($Id = null, $TeacherId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function frontendCustodyAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCustodyAdd($Id = null, $PersonId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendSubjectGroupRemove has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupRemove($Id = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $SubjectGroupId = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Gruppe', 'entfernen');
Function formLevelDivision has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formLevelDivision(TblLevel $tblLevel = null, TblDivision $tblDivision = null, $future = false)
{
$tblLevelAll = Division::useService()->getLevelAll();
$acNameAll = array();- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function frontendSubjectGroupAdd has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupAdd($Id = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $Group = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Fach-Gruppen', 'Übersicht');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (($tblDivisionSubjectTemp = $tblSubjectStudent->getTblDivisionSubject())
&& ($tblSubjectTemp = $tblDivisionSubjectTemp->getServiceTblSubject())
&& ($tblPerson = $tblSubjectStudent->getServiceTblPerson())
) {
if ($IsSekTwo) {Function frontendDivisionChange has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDivisionChange($Id = null, $Division = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Klasse', 'Bearbeiten');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (($tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($DivisionId))
&& ($tblLevel = $tblDivision->getTblLevel())
&& ($tblType = $tblLevel->getServiceTblType())
&& $tblType->getName() == 'Gymnasium'
&& ($tblLevel->getName() == '11'Method frontendSubjectGroupChange has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectGroupChange($Id = null, $SubjectId = null, $DivisionId = null, $DivisionSubjectId = null, $Group = null)Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $Stage;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $Stage;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $Stage;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return $ObjectA->getId() - $ObjectB->getId();Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCustodyAdd($Id = null, $PersonId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1294.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendTeacherAdd($Id = null, $TeacherId = null, $Remove = null, $Description = null)
{
$tblDivision = $Id === null ? false : Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id);
if (!$tblDivision) {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 1294.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectStudentAddAll(
$Id = null,
$DivisionSubjectId = null
) {
if (($tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id))- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 216.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectStudentRemoveAll(
$Id = null,
$DivisionSubjectId = null
) {
if (($tblDivision = Division::useService()->getDivisionById($Id))- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 216.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$StudentPanel[$tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName()] = New Panel(
$tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->isAdvancedCourse()
? new Bold($tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName())
: $tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName(),
$StudentArray, $tblDivisionSubject->getHasGrading() ? Panel::PANEL_TYPE_INFO : Panel::PANEL_TYPE_WARNING,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$TeacherPanelArray[$tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName()] = New Panel(
$tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->isAdvancedCourse()
? new Bold($tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName())
: $tblDivisionSubjectTest->getTblSubjectGroup()->getName(),
$TeachersArray, $tblDivisionSubject->getHasGrading() ? Panel::PANEL_TYPE_INFO : Panel::PANEL_TYPE_WARNING,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 119.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($personBasicCourseList[$tblPerson->getId()])
&& !empty($personBasicCourseList[$tblPerson->getId()])
) {
ksort($personBasicCourseList[$tblPerson->getId()]);
$item['BasicCourses'] = $isInActive- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (isset($personSubjectList[$tblPerson->getId()])
&& !empty($personSubjectList[$tblPerson->getId()])
) {
ksort($personSubjectList[$tblPerson->getId()]);
$item['Subjects'] = $isInActive- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 118.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
array_walk($tblTeacherAllList, function(TblPerson $tblPerson) use (&$rightTableContent, $tblDivision, $tblDivisionSubject) {
$Item['DisplayName'] = $tblPerson->getLastFirstName();
$Item['Address'] = $tblPerson->fetchMainAddress() ? $tblPerson->fetchMainAddress()->getGuiString() : '';
$Item['Options'] = new PullRight(
new \SPHERE\Common\Frontend\Link\Repository\Primary('Hinzufügen',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 117.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($tblPerson) {
$Item['DisplayName'] = $tblPerson->getLastFirstName();
$Item['Address'] = $tblPerson->fetchMainAddress() ? $tblPerson->fetchMainAddress()->getGuiString() : '';
$Item['Option'] = new PullRight(
new \SPHERE\Common\Frontend\Link\Repository\Primary('Entfernen',- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 117.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($tblCustodyList) {
$CustodyList = array();
/** @var TblPerson $tblPerson */
foreach ($tblCustodyList as &$tblPerson) {
$Description = Division::useService()->getDivisionCustodyByDivisionAndPerson($tblDivision,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if ($tblPersonList) {
$TeacherList = array();
foreach ($tblPersonList as $tblPerson) {
$Description = Division::useService()->getDivisionTeacherByDivisionAndTeacher($tblDivision,
$tblPerson)->getDescription();- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 109.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$Temp['Option'] = new Standard(' Klassenansicht', '/Education/Lesson/Division/Show',
new EyeOpen(), array('Id' => $tblDivision->getId()), 'Klasse einsehen')
.new Standard('', '/Education/Lesson/Division/Change', new Pencil(),
array('Id' => $tblDivision->getId()), 'Beschreibung bearbeiten')
.new Standard('', '/Education/Lesson/Division/Copy', new MoreItems(),- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 106.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
new Layout(
new LayoutGroup(
new LayoutRow(
new LayoutColumn(
new Well(- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 99.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!$tblDivisionSubject) {
$Stage = new Stage('Schüler', 'auswählen');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));
$Stage->setContent(new Warning('Fach nicht gefunden'));
return $Stage . new Redirect('/Education/Lesson/Division/Show', Redirect::TIMEOUT_ERROR,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!$tblDivisionSubject) {
$Stage = new Stage('Fachlehrer', 'auswählen');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Division', new ChevronLeft()));
$Stage->setContent(new Warning('Fach in der Klasse nicht gefunden'));
return $Stage.new Redirect('/Education/Lesson/Division/Show', Redirect::TIMEOUT_ERROR,- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 98.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
new LayoutGroup(
new LayoutRow(
new LayoutColumn(
new Well(
Division::useService()->createLevelDivision(- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76