File Frontend.php
has 930 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
<?php
namespace SPHERE\Application\Education\Lesson\Subject;
use SPHERE\Application\Education\Lesson\Division\Division;
use SPHERE\Application\Education\Lesson\Subject\Service\Entity\TblCategory;
Function frontendSubjectPersonAdd
has a Cognitive Complexity of 66 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectPersonAdd(
$Id = null,
$SubjectId = null,
$Group = null,
$DataAddPerson = null,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendSubjectPersonAdd
has 231 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendSubjectPersonAdd(
$Id = null,
$SubjectId = null,
$Group = null,
$DataAddPerson = null,
Function frontendLinkPerson
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendLinkPerson($Id = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('', 'Zuordnung');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method frontendLinkPerson
has 59 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendLinkPerson($Id = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('', 'Zuordnung');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Method frontendCreateCategory
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCreateCategory($Category = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Kategorien', 'Übersicht');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Method frontendDestroySubject
has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDestroySubject(
$Id = null,
$Confirm = false
) {
Method frontendCreateSubject
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendCreateSubject($Subject = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Fächer', 'Übersicht');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Method frontendDestroyCategory
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendDestroyCategory(
$Id = null,
$Confirm = false
) {
Method formLinkCategory
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formLinkCategory(TblGroup $tblGroup = null, $IsStandardGroup = false)
{
$tblCategoryAllSelected = $tblGroup->getTblCategoryAll();
if ($tblCategoryAllSelected) {
Method frontendChangeSubject
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendChangeSubject($Id, $Subject)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Fach', 'Bearbeiten');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject/Create/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Method formSubject
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formSubject(TblSubject $tblSubject = null)
{
$acAcronymAll = array();
$acNameAll = array();
Method frontendChangeCategory
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendChangeCategory($Id, $Category)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Kategorie', 'Bearbeiten');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject/Create/Category', new ChevronLeft()));
Method frontendLinkCategory
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendLinkCategory($Id, $Category = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Kategorien', 'Verknüpfung');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Method formCategory
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formCategory(TblCategory $tblCategory = null)
{
$tblCategoryAll = Subject::useService()->getCategoryAll();
$acAcronymAll = array();
Method frontendLinkSubject
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function frontendLinkSubject($Id, $Subject = null)
{
$Stage = new Stage('Fächer', 'Verknüpfung');
$Stage->addButton(new Standard('Zurück', '/Education/Lesson/Subject', new ChevronLeft()));
Function formFilter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function formFilter()
{
// $tblGroupAll = Group::useService()->getGroupAllSorted();
$tblDivisionList = array();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method formLinkSubject
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public function formLinkSubject(TblCategory $tblCategory = null)
{
$tblSubjectAllSelected = $tblCategory->getTblSubjectAll();
if ($tblSubjectAllSelected) {
Method frontendSubjectPersonAdd
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
$Id = null,
$SubjectId = null,
$Group = null,
$DataAddPerson = null,
$DataRemovePerson = null,
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if ($StudentSubject->getServiceTblSubject()->getName() == $tblSubject->getName()) {
$tblPersonList[] = $tblPersonStudent;
}
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return $Stage;
Function setPersonData
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private function setPersonData(TblPerson $tblPerson, $DataName)
{
$result = array();
$result['Check'] = new CheckBox(
$DataName.'['.$tblPerson->getId().']',
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (!$Confirm) {
$Stage->setContent(
new Layout(new LayoutGroup(new LayoutRow(new LayoutColumn(array(
new Panel(
'Kategorie',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 203.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$displayAvailablePersons = new TableData(
$tblPersonAll,
new \SPHERE\Common\Frontend\Table\Repository\Title('Fach "'.$tblSubject->getName().'" von der Kategorie "'.$SubjectGroup.'" der Personen',
'hinzufügen'),
array(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 193.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
? new TableData(
$tblPersonList,
new \SPHERE\Common\Frontend\Table\Repository\Title('Fach "'.$tblSubject->getName().'" von der Kategorie "'.$SubjectGroup.'" der Personen',
'entfernen'),
array(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 193.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
new Layout(
new LayoutGroup(
new LayoutRow(
new LayoutColumn(
new Panel('Fach', $tblSubject->getAcronym() . ' - ' . $tblSubject->getName(),
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
new Layout(
new LayoutGroup(
new LayoutRow(
new LayoutColumn(
new Panel('Kategorie',
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 107.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
new LayoutGroup(
new LayoutRow(
new LayoutColumn(
new Well(
Subject::useService()->changeCategorySubject(
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 97.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76