Dynamoid/dynamoid

View on GitHub

Showing 81 of 81 total issues

File aws_sdk_v3.rb has 370 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require_relative 'aws_sdk_v3/query'
require_relative 'aws_sdk_v3/scan'
require_relative 'aws_sdk_v3/execute_statement'
require_relative 'aws_sdk_v3/create_table'
require_relative 'aws_sdk_v3/batch_get_item'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

    Class Chain has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        class Chain
          attr_reader :source, :consistent_read, :key_fields_detector
    
          include Enumerable
    
    
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/dynamoid/criteria/chain.rb - About 4 hrs to fix

      Class AwsSdkV3 has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          class AwsSdkV3
            EQ = 'EQ'
            HASH_KEY  = 'HASH'
            RANGE_KEY = 'RANGE'
            STRING_TYPE  = 'S'
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

        File chain.rb has 300 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        require_relative 'key_fields_detector'
        require_relative 'nonexistent_fields_detector'
        require_relative 'where_conditions'
        
        module Dynamoid
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/dynamoid/criteria/chain.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

          Method _find_all has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def _find_all(ids, options = {})
                  raise Errors::MissingRangeKey if range_key && ids.any? { |_pk, sk| sk.nil? }
          
                  if range_key
                    ids = ids.map do |pk, sk|
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/dynamoid/finders.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                def call
                  @model.hash_key = SecureRandom.uuid if @model.hash_key.blank?
          
                  return true unless @model.changed?
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/dynamoid/persistence/save.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              class ArrayTypeCaster < Base
                def process(value)
                  array = type_cast_to_array(value)
          
                  if array.present? && @options[:of].present?
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb on lines 115..160

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 95.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
          Open

              class SetTypeCaster < Base
                def process(value)
                  set = type_cast_to_set(value)
          
                  if set.present? && @options[:of].present?
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
          lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb on lines 165..210

          Duplicated Code

          Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

          Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

          When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

          Tuning

          This issue has a mass of 95.

          We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

          The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

          If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

          See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

          Refactorings

          Further Reading

          Method dynamodb_type has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              def self.dynamodb_type(type, options)
                if type.is_a?(Class)
                  type = type.respond_to?(:dynamoid_field_type) ? type.dynamoid_field_type : :string
                end
          
          
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/dynamoid/primary_key_type_mapping.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method call has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

                  def call
                    billing_mode = options[:billing_mode]
                    read_capacity = options[:read_capacity] || Dynamoid::Config.read_capacity
                    write_capacity = options[:write_capacity] || Dynamoid::Config.write_capacity
          
          
          Severity: Major
          Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3/create_table.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

            File type_casting.rb has 254 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

            module Dynamoid
              # @private
              module TypeCasting
                def self.cast_attributes(attributes, attributes_options)
                  {}.tap do |h|
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

              Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      def call
                        results = {}
              
                        tables_with_ids.each do |table, ids|
                          if ids.blank?
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3/batch_get_item.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def self.find_type_caster(options)
                    type_caster_class = case options[:type]
                                        when :string     then StringTypeCaster
                                        when :integer    then IntegerTypeCaster
                                        when :number     then NumberTypeCaster
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
              lib/dynamoid/dumping.rb on lines 26..44
              lib/dynamoid/undumping.rb on lines 29..47

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 66.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def self.find_undumper(options)
                    undumper_class = case options[:type]
                                     when :string     then StringUndumper
                                     when :integer    then IntegerUndumper
                                     when :number     then NumberUndumper
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/dynamoid/undumping.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
              lib/dynamoid/dumping.rb on lines 26..44
              lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb on lines 26..44

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 66.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def self.find_dumper(options)
                    dumper_class = case options[:type]
                                   when :string     then StringDumper
                                   when :integer    then IntegerDumper
                                   when :number     then NumberDumper
              Severity: Major
              Found in lib/dynamoid/dumping.rb and 2 other locations - About 1 hr to fix
              lib/dynamoid/type_casting.rb on lines 26..44
              lib/dynamoid/undumping.rb on lines 29..47

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 66.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Method _find_all has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                    def _find_all(ids, options = {})
                      raise Errors::MissingRangeKey if range_key && ids.any? { |_pk, sk| sk.nil? }
              
                      if range_key
                        ids = ids.map do |pk, sk|
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/dynamoid/finders.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        def call
                          billing_mode = options[:billing_mode]
                          read_capacity = options[:read_capacity] || Dynamoid::Config.read_capacity
                          write_capacity = options[:write_capacity] || Dynamoid::Config.write_capacity
                
                
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3/create_table.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method build has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        def build
                          clauses = @conditions.map do |name, attribute_conditions|
                            attribute_conditions.map do |operator, value|
                              name_or_placeholder = name_or_placeholder_for(name)
                
                

                  Method build_request has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                          def build_request
                            # expressions
                            name_placeholder = +'#_a0'
                            value_placeholder = +':_a0'
                  
                  
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lib/dynamoid/adapter_plugin/aws_sdk_v3/query.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                    Method to_h has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                          def to_h
                            if model
                              # model.hash_key = SecureRandom.uuid if model.hash_key.blank?
                              touch_model_timestamps(skip_created_at: true)
                              changes = model.changes.map { |k, v| [k.to_sym, v[1]] }.to_h # hash of dirty attributes
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lib/dynamoid/transaction_write/update_upsert.rb - About 1 hr to fix
                      Severity
                      Category
                      Status
                      Source
                      Language