Sign upLogin

ESheahan/espolea

View on GitHub
Star
app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage

Method add_unhelpful has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def add_unhelpful
      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both

      if user and review
          if not _unhelpful
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method add_helpful has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def add_helpful
    user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both 

    if user and review
        if not _helpful
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method check_conflict has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def check_conflict
        if current_user
            if current_user.clinics_id and current_user.clinics_id == params[:review][:clinic_id].to_i
                #Trying to create a review for own clinic -- conflict of interest
                redirect_to request.referer and return
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def add_unhelpful
      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both

      if user and review
          if not _unhelpful
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb on lines 88..106

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def add_helpful
    user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both 

    if user and review
        if not _helpful
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb on lines 122..138

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 37.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

    user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

    user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

Do not use prefix _ for a variable that is used.
Open

      user, review, _helpful, _unhelpful = retrieve_both
Severity: Minor
Found in app/controllers/reviews_controller.rb by rubocop

This cop checks for underscore-prefixed variables that are actually used.

Example:

# bad

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something(_num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |num|
  do_something(num)
end

Example:

# good

[1, 2, 3].each do |_num|
  do_something # not using `_num`
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status