File responder.rb
has 253 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'English'
require 'rexml/document'
module Wechat
module Responder
Method on
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on(message_type, with: nil, respond: nil, &block)
config = respond.nil? ? {} : { respond: respond }
config[:proc] = block if block_given?
if with.present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method responder_for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def responder_for(message)
message_type = message[:MsgType].to_sym
responders = user_defined_responders(message_type)
case message_type
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method match_responders
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def match_responders(responders, value)
matched = responders.each_with_object({}) do |responder, memo|
condition = responder[:with]
if condition.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method on
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def on(message_type, with: nil, respond: nil, &block)
config = respond.nil? ? {} : { respond: respond }
config[:proc] = block if block_given?
if with.present?
Method responder_for
has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def responder_for(message)
message_type = message[:MsgType].to_sym
responders = user_defined_responders(message_type)
case message_type
Method run_responder
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def run_responder(request)
self.class.responder_for(request) do |responder, *args|
responder ||= self.class.user_defined_responders(:fallback).first
next if responder.nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method post_body
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def post_body
if request.media_type == 'application/json'
data_hash = params
if @we_encrypt_mode && data['Encrypt'].present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method verify_signature
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def verify_signature
if @we_encrypt_mode
signature = params[:signature] || params[:msg_signature]
msg_encrypt = params[:echostr] || request_encrypt_content
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method known_scan_with_match_responders
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def known_scan_with_match_responders(responders, message)
matched = responders.each_with_object({}) do |responder, memo|
if %w[scan subscribe].freeze.include?(message[:Event]) && message[:EventKey] == responder[:with]
memo[:scaned] ||= [responder, message[:Ticket]]
elsif %w[scancode_push scancode_waitmsg].freeze.include?(message[:Event]) && message[:EventKey] == responder[:with]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use match?
instead of =~
when MatchData
is not used. Open
memo[:scoped] ||= [responder] + $LAST_MATCH_INFO.captures if value =~ condition
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
In Ruby 2.4, String#match?
, Regexp#match?
and Symbol#match?
have been added. The methods are faster than match
.
Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData
object or saving
backref.
So, when MatchData
is not used, use match?
instead of match
.
Example:
# bad
def foo
if x =~ /re/
do_something
end
end
# bad
def foo
if x.match(/re/)
do_something
end
end
# bad
def foo
if /re/ === x
do_something
end
end
# good
def foo
if x.match?(/re/)
do_something
end
end
# good
def foo
if x =~ /re/
do_something(Regexp.last_match)
end
end
# good
def foo
if x.match(/re/)
do_something($~)
end
end
# good
def foo
if /re/ === x
do_something($~)
end
end