FluentLenium/FluentLenium

View on GitHub
fluentlenium-core/src/test/java/io/fluentlenium/core/inject/FluentInjectorHookTest.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

File FluentInjectorHookTest.java has 425 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package io.fluentlenium.core.inject;

import io.fluentlenium.adapter.FluentAdapter;
import io.fluentlenium.core.FluentControl;
import io.fluentlenium.core.FluentPage;

    Method testFluentWebElementClass has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @Test
        public void testFluentWebElementClass() { // NOPMD ExcessiveMethodLength
            FluentWebElementClassContainer container = new FluentWebElementClassContainer();
    
            WebElement element = mock(WebElement.class);

      Method testFluentWebElementExtendsContainer has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Test
          public void testFluentWebElementExtendsContainer() {
              FluentWebElementExtendsContainer container = new FluentWebElementExtendsContainer();
      
              WebElement element = mock(WebElement.class);

        Method testFluentList has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            @Test
            public void testFluentList() {
                FluentListContainer container = new FluentListContainer();
        
                WebElement element1 = mock(WebElement.class);

          Method testWebElementWrapperList has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              @Test
              public void testWebElementWrapperList() {
                  WebElementWrapperListContainer container = new WebElementWrapperListContainer();
          
                  WebElement element1 = mock(WebElement.class);

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                @Test
                public void testFluentWebElementAnnotation() {
                    FluentWebElementAnnotation container = new FluentWebElementAnnotation();
            
                    WebElement element = mock(WebElement.class);
            fluentlenium-core/src/test/java/io/fluentlenium/core/inject/FluentInjectorHookTest.java on lines 110..135

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 187.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                @Test
                public void testFluentWebElementOption() {
                    FluentWebElementOptionContainer container = new FluentWebElementOptionContainer();
            
                    WebElement element = mock(WebElement.class);
            fluentlenium-core/src/test/java/io/fluentlenium/core/inject/FluentInjectorHookTest.java on lines 494..519

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 187.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Name 'io.fluentlenium.core.inject' must match pattern '^org.[a-z]+(.[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_]*)*$'.
            Open

            package io.fluentlenium.core.inject;

            Checks that package names conform to a specified pattern.

            The default value of format for module PackageName has beenchosen to match the requirements in the JavaLanguage specification and the Sun coding conventions. Howeverboth underscores and uppercase letters are rather uncommon, so mostconfigurations should probably assign value ^[a-z]+(\.[a-z][a-z0-9]*)*$ toformat for module PackageName.

            This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status