Showing 5 of 5 total issues
Class Plotter
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Plotter
attr_accessor :paddings
# @param [Prawn::Document] a PDF document to wrap in a Plotter instance.
def initialize(pdf, bottom:)
@pdf = pdf
Method for
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.for(series, minmax:, height:, labels:, stack:, formats:)
@min = Hash.new 0
@max = Hash.new 0
min, max = minmax
offset = -> (value) { value * height.to_f / (max-min) }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method item
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def item(point, color, w, fill, index, count)
padding = w / 8
with transparency: 0.95, fill_color: color, stroke_color: color do
yield point, w, index, padding
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method item
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def item(point, color, w, fill, index, count)
Method draw_chart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def draw_chart(axis, second_axis: false)
args = {minmax: axis.minmax, height: grid_height, stack: stack?}
args[:labels] = items_of labels, skip_first_if: second_axis
args[:formats] = items_of formats, skip_first_if: second_axis
points = Point.for axis.data, **args
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"