Showing 144 of 144 total issues
Method generate_dwca
has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/parentNameUsageID",
Method generate_dwca
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/kingdom",
Method enrich_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def enrich_data
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Extracting data from xml file...")
Dir.chdir(@download_dir)
f = open("data.xml", "r:utf-8")
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_names
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_names
file = CSV.open(File.join(@download_dir, "data.csv"),
headers: true)
file.each_with_index do |row, i|
kingdom = "Animalia"
Method generate_dwca
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
Method generate_dwca
has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonId",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/parentNameUsageId",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/kingdom",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 67.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method collect_names
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_names
tpt_dir = "tpt-taxonomy-main"
tpt_path = File.join(@download_dir, tpt_dir)
@names_index = {}
files = Dir.entries(tpt_path)
Method generate_dwca
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
Method get_names
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_names
# 0 tsn serial not null
# 1 unit_ind1 char(1)
# 2 unit_name1 char(35) not null
# 3 unit_ind2 char(1)
Method collect_names
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_names
@names_index = {}
file = CSV.open(File.join(@download_dir, find_csv_file),
headers: true, col_sep: "|", quote_char: "\b")
file.each do |row|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_names
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_names
@names_index = {}
file = CSV.open(File.join(@download_dir, "data.tsv"),
headers: true, col_sep: "\t", quote_char: "\b")
file.each_with_index do |row, i|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method organize_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def organize_data
@data = JSON.load(open(@download_path, "r:utf-8").read)
@data.each do |d|
scientific_name = d["scientific_name"].to_s
id = d["id"]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_hierarchy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_hierarchy(rec)
parent_id = @clades["Mammalia"][:id]
is_row_rank = false
%i[order suborder infraorder superfamily family
subfamily tribe genus subgenus species subspecies].each do |rank|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collect_names
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def collect_names
@names_index = {}
file = CSV.open(File.join(@download_dir, "data.csv"),
headers: true)
file.each_with_index do |row, _i|
Method generate_dwca
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id,
"Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
Method generate_dwca
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonId",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/parentNameUsageId",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
Method generate_dwca
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/acceptedNameUsageID",
Method generate_dwca
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def generate_dwca
DwcaHunter.logger_write(object_id, "Creating DarwinCore Archive file")
@core = [["http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonID",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/scientificName",
"http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/taxonRank",