Sign upLogin

GlobalNamesArchitecture/dwca-hunter

View on GitHub
Star
lib/dwca_hunter/resources/mammal_species.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage

Method process_hierarchy has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def process_hierarchy(rec)
      parent_id = @clades["Mammalia"][:id]
      is_row_rank = false
      %i[order suborder infraorder superfamily family
         subfamily tribe genus subgenus species subspecies].each do |rank|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/dwca_hunter/resources/mammal_species.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method process_synonyms has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def process_synonyms(rec, taxon)
      accepted_id = taxon[0]
      parent_id = taxon[2]
      rank = taxon[-1]
      return unless %w[species subspecies].include? rank
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/dwca_hunter/resources/mammal_species.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method real_name? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def real_name?(str)
      parsed = @parser.parse(str)
      return false unless parsed[:parsed]
      epithets = parsed[:canonicalName][:simple].split(" ")[1..-1]
      return false if epithets.nil? || epithets.empty?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/dwca_hunter/resources/mammal_species.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status