Showing 25 of 25 total issues
Method search_by_condition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_by_condition(args)
refresh
attr = args[:attr]
oper = args[:oper]
value = args[:value]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method search_by_condition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_by_condition(args)
find_all
attrs = args[:attr]
oper = args[:oper]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for search_by_condition is too high. [21/10] Open
def search_by_condition(args)
refresh
attr = args[:attr]
oper = args[:oper]
value = args[:value]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method process_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_files(attrs, sockets)
fd_dir = "/proc/#{attrs[:pid]}/fd"
files = Array.new
ports = Array.new
if File.readable?(fd_dir)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for search_by_condition is too high. [14/10] Open
def search_by_condition(args)
find_all
attrs = args[:attr]
oper = args[:oper]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method process_limits
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_limits(pid)
limits_file = "/proc/#{pid}/limits"
limits_list = Array.new
if File.readable?(limits_file)
File.foreach(limits_file).each do |line|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for process_status is too high. [12/10] Open
def process_status(attrs)
status_file = "/proc/#{attrs[:pid]}/status"
File.foreach(status_file).each do |attr|
if attr =~ /Name:/
attrs[:name] = attr.split(' ')[1]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Method process_status
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_status(attrs)
status_file = "/proc/#{attrs[:pid]}/status"
File.foreach(status_file).each do |attr|
if attr =~ /Name:/
attrs[:name] = attr.split(' ')[1]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method process_status
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_status(attrs)
status_file = "/proc/#{attrs[:pid]}/status"
File.foreach(status_file).each do |attr|
if attr =~ /Name:/
attrs[:name] = attr.split(' ')[1]
Method search_by_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_by_name(process_name)
if process_name =~ /^\/.*\/$/
process_name.slice!(0)
process_name = Regexp.new(/#{process_name.chop}/)
find_all
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class HawatelPSException < Exception
# Custom exception
# @param args [Hash] the options to create a custom exception message
# @option :exception [Exception] Native Exception object
# @option :message [String] Custom message
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
class WmiCliException < Exception
# Custom exception
# @param args [Hash] the options to create a custom exception message
# @option :exception [Exception] Native Exception object
# @option :message [String] Custom message
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method process_limits
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_limits(pid)
limits_file = "/proc/#{pid}/limits"
limits_list = Array.new
if File.readable?(limits_file)
File.foreach(limits_file).each do |line|
Method search_by_name
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def search_by_name(process_name)
refresh
process_list = Array.new
if process_name =~ /^\/.*\/$/
process_name.slice!(0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
process_list << process if process[:"#{attr}"] <= value if process[:"#{attr}"]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
process_list << process if process[:"#{attrs}"] <= value
Method prepare_wql
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def prepare_wql(query, args = nil)
if args.nil?
return query
else
query += " WHERE "
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
process_list << process if process[:"#{attr}"] >= value if process[:"#{attr}"]
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
elsif oper == '=='
process_list << process if process[:"#{attrs}"] == value
elsif oper == '!='
process_list << process if process[:"#{attrs}"] != value
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
elsif oper == '=='
process_list << process if process[:"#{attr}"] == value if process[:"#{attr}"]
elsif oper == '!='
process_list << process if process[:"#{attr}"] != value if process[:"#{attr}"]