File TestRouteRegex.swift has 774 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import Foundation
import XCTest
@testable import Kitura
@testable import KituraNetFunction testCustomMatchesWithModifiers has 231 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testCustomMatchesWithModifiers() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id(\\d+)?", handler: handler)
Function testSimpleModifiers has 201 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleModifiers() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id?", handler: handler)
Function testCustomMatchesWithModifiers has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testCustomMatchesWithModifiers() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id(\\d+)?", handler: handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSimpleModifiers has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleModifiers() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id?", handler: handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSimplePaths has 90 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimplePaths() {
var router = Router()
router.all("", handler: handler)
Function testSimpleMatches has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleMatches() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/test", handler: handler)
Function testBuildRegexFromPattern has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testBuildRegexFromPattern() {
var regex: NSRegularExpression?
var isSimpleString = false
var strings: [String]?Function testSimpleMatches has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleMatches() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/test", handler: handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSimplePaths has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimplePaths() {
var router = Router()
router.all("", handler: handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSimpleCustomMatches has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleCustomMatches() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id(\\d+)", handler: handler)
Function testSimpleCustomMatches has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleCustomMatches() {
var router = Router()
router.all("/:id(\\d+)", handler: handler)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testRouteWithPercentEncoding has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testRouteWithPercentEncoding() {
let router = Router()
router.get("/say hello", handler: makeHandler(helloworld + " with whitespace"))
router.get("/say%20hello", handler: makeHandler(helloworld + " with %20"))
router.get("/say+hello", handler: makeHandler(helloworld + " with +"))- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* Copyright IBM Corporation 2016, 2017
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 139.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
static var allTests: [(String, (TestRouteRegex) -> () throws -> Void)] {
return [
("testBuildRegexFromPattern", testBuildRegexFromPattern),
("testSimplePaths", testSimplePaths),
("testSimpleMatches", testSimpleMatches),- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 94.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
do {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
do {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "/123/abc/456/def", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
do {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "/helloworld", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
do {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "/test", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
do {- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
XCTAssertEqual(strings![0], "id")
(regex, isSimpleString, strings) = RouteRegex.sharedInstance.buildRegex(fromPattern: "/test/(Kitura\\d*)", allowPartialMatch: false)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
XCTAssertEqual(strings![0], "id")
(regex, isSimpleString, strings) = RouteRegex.sharedInstance.buildRegex(fromPattern: "test/:id*", allowPartialMatch: false)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
XCTAssertEqual(strings![0], "id")
(regex, isSimpleString, strings) = RouteRegex.sharedInstance.buildRegex(fromPattern: "/test/:id(Kitura\\d*)", allowPartialMatch: false)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
XCTAssertEqual(strings![0], "id")
(regex, isSimpleString, strings) = RouteRegex.sharedInstance.buildRegex(fromPattern: "/test/:id(\\d*)", allowPartialMatch: false)- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })