Function testMergeParams has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testMergeParams() {
let simpleHandler = { (req: RouterRequest, res: RouterResponse, next: () -> Void) throws in
next()
}
Function setupRouter has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static func setupRouter() -> Router {
let subsubRouter = Router()
subsubRouter.get("/") { _, response, next in
response.status(HTTPStatusCode.OK).send("hello from the sub sub")
next()Function testExternSub has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testExternSub() {
router.all("/extern", middleware: ExternSubrouter.getRouter())
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/extern", callback: {response inFunction testMergeParams has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testMergeParams() {
let simpleHandler = { (req: RouterRequest, res: RouterResponse, next: () -> Void) throws in
next()
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSubSubs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSubSubs() {
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub/sub2", callback: {response in
XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testSimpleSub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleSub() {
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub", callback: {response in
XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function testExternSub has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func testExternSub() {
router.all("/extern", middleware: ExternSubrouter.getRouter())
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/extern", callback: {response in- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func testSimpleSub() {
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub", callback: {response in
XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 212.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func testSubSubs() {
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub/sub2", callback: {response in
XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 212.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
performServerTest(router, asyncTasks: { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "/root1/123/sub1/456/subsub1/789", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
var data = Data()- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 153.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
}, { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path: "/root1/123/sub1/456/subsub2/passthrough", callback: { response in
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, .OK)
var data = Data()- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 153.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
func testMultipleMiddleware() {
performServerTest(router) { expectation in
self.performRequest("get", path:"/middle/sub1", callback: {response in
XCTAssertNotNil(response, "ERROR!!! ClientRequest response object was nil")
XCTAssertEqual(response?.statusCode, HTTPStatusCode.OK, "HTTP Status code was \(String(describing: response?.statusCode))")- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 131.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
static var allTests: [(String, (TestSubrouter) -> () throws -> Void)] {
return [
("testSimpleSub", testSimpleSub),
("testExternSub", testExternSub),
("testSubSubs", testSubSubs),- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 78.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub/sub2", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/middle/sub1", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/extern/sub1", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub/sub2/sub1", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub/sub1", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/sub", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Parameter clause in closure signature should be preceded by exactly one space Open
self.performRequest("get", path:"/extern", callback: {response in- Exclude checks
Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })Closure is the function's final argument and may be passed as a trailing closure instead Open
}, { expectation in- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
trailing-closure
Closures that are the last argument of a function should be passed into the function using trailing closure syntax.
Preferred
reversed = names.sort { s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 }Not Preferred
reversed = names.sort({ s1, s2 in return s1 > s2 })