Sign upLogin

Katello/katello

View on GitHub
Star
lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpPythonClient::PythonPythonDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpContainerClient::ContainerContainerDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpRpmClient::RpmRpmDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpAnsibleClient::AnsibleAnsibleDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpFileClient::FileFileDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpDebClient::DebAptDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpOstreeClient::OstreeOstreeDistribution` initialize method"
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File remove_hidden_distribution.rb has 273 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

require 'pulp_rpm_client'
require 'pulp_container_client'
require 'pulp_ostree_client'
require 'pulp_file_client'
require 'pulp_deb_client'
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

    Method initialize has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpPythonClient::PythonPythonDistribution` initialize method"
    end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

      Method initialize has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpContainerClient::ContainerContainerDistribution` initialize method"
    end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Method initialize has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpOstreeClient::OstreeOstreeDistribution` initialize method"
    end
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method initialize has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpAnsibleClient::AnsibleAnsibleDistribution` initialize method"
    end
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method initialize has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpDebClient::DebAptDistribution` initialize method"
    end
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method initialize has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpRpmClient::RpmRpmDistribution` initialize method"
    end
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                Method initialize has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
      fail ArgumentError, "The input argument (attributes) must be a hash in `PulpFileClient::FileFileDistribution` initialize method"
    end
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb - About 1 hr to fix

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  PulpRpmClient::RpmRpmDistribution.class_eval do
  # Initializes the object
  # @param [Hash] attributes Model attributes in the form of hash
  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 231..277
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 282..328
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 334..380

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 117.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  PulpFileClient::FileFileDistribution.class_eval do
  # Initializes the object
  # @param [Hash] attributes Model attributes in the form of hash
  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 121..167
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 282..328
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 334..380

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 117.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  PulpOstreeClient::OstreeOstreeDistribution.class_eval do
  # Initializes the object
  # @param [Hash] attributes Model attributes in the form of hash
  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 121..167
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 231..277
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 282..328

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 117.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                  PulpDebClient::DebAptDistribution.class_eval do
  # Initializes the object
  # @param [Hash] attributes Model attributes in the form of hash
  def initialize(attributes = {})
    if (!attributes.is_a?(Hash))
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb and 3 other locations - About 3 hrs to fix
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 121..167
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 231..277
                  lib/monkeys/remove_hidden_distribution.rb on lines 334..380

                  Duplicated Code

                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                  Tuning

                  This issue has a mass of 117.

                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                  Refactorings

                  Further Reading

                  There are no issues that match your filters.

                  Category
                  Status