Showing 395 of 395 total issues
Expected an indentation at 12 instead of at 10. Open
retention_days: "30"
- Exclude checks
Expected an indentation at 4 instead of at 2. Open
autoupdate:
- Exclude checks
Expected an indentation at 20 instead of at 18. Open
api_definition_file=args.src_file,
- Exclude checks
Expected an indentation at 16 instead of at 14. Open
f' Feel free to report the issue',)
- Exclude checks
Expected an indentation at 4 instead of at 2. Open
apifuzzer:
- Exclude checks
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 24 to the 15 allowed. Open
def _resolve(self, data):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 19 to the 15 allowed. Open
def _process_request_body(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 40 to the 15 allowed. Open
def transmit(self, **kwargs):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 44 to the 15 allowed. Open
def _process_api_resources(self, paths=None, existing_template=None):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Remove this commented out code. Open
# schema = materialize(RefDict("https://json-schema.org/draft-04/schema#/"))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Programmers should not comment out code as it bloats programs and reduces readability.
Unused code should be deleted and can be retrieved from source control history if required.
See
- MISRA C:2004, 2.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out".
- MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-2 - Sections of code shall not be "commented out" using C-style comments.
- MISRA C++:2008, 2-7-3 - Sections of code should not be "commented out" using C++ comments.
- MISRA C:2012, Dir. 4.4 - Sections of code should not be "commented out"
Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "51" or change one of the implementations. Open
handler = logging.StreamHandler(stream=sys.stdout)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Having two branches in the same if
structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If
the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.
Noncompliant Code Example
if 0 <= a < 10: do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() elif 20 <= a < 50: do_the_thing() # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition else: do_the_rest() b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
Compliant Solution
if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50): do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() else: do_the_rest() b = 4
or
if 0 <= a < 10: do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() elif 20 <= a < 50: do_the_third_thing() else: do_the_rest() b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
Remove or correct this useless self-assignment. Open
self.logger = self.logger = get_logger(self.__class__.__name__)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
There is no reason to re-assign a variable to itself. Either this statement is redundant and should be removed, or the re-assignment is a mistake and some other value or variable was intended for the assignment instead.
Noncompliant Code Example
name = name
Compliant Solution
name = other.name
See
- CERT, MSC12-C. - Detect and remove code that has no effect or is never executed
- CERT, MSC12-CPP. - Detect and remove code that has no effect
Either merge this branch with the identical one on line "257" or change one of the implementations. Open
template.params.add(
fuzz_type(name=param_name, value=str(sample_data))
)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Having two branches in the same if
structure with the same implementation is at best duplicate code, and at worst a coding error. If
the same logic is truly needed for both instances, then they should be combined.
Noncompliant Code Example
if 0 <= a < 10: do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() elif 20 <= a < 50: do_the_thing() # Noncompliant; duplicates first condition else: do_the_rest() b = 4 if a > 12 else 4
Compliant Solution
if (0 <= a < 10) or (20 <= a < 50): do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() else: do_the_rest() b = 4
or
if 0 <= a < 10: do_the_thing() elif 10 <= a < 20: do_the_other_thing() elif 20 <= a < 50: do_the_third_thing() else: do_the_rest() b = 8 if a > 12 else 4
Method "__init__" has 11 parameters, which is greater than the 7 authorized. Open
self,
report_dir,
test_level,
log_level,
basic_output,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
A long parameter list can indicate that a new structure should be created to wrap the numerous parameters or that the function is doing too many things.
Noncompliant Code Example
With a maximum number of 4 parameters:
def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4, param5): ...
Compliant Solution
def do_something(param1, param2, param3, param4): ...
Remove or correct this useless self-assignment. Open
self.logger = self.logger = get_logger(self.__class__.__name__)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
There is no reason to re-assign a variable to itself. Either this statement is redundant and should be removed, or the re-assignment is a mistake and some other value or variable was intended for the assignment instead.
Noncompliant Code Example
name = name
Compliant Solution
name = other.name
See
- CERT, MSC12-C. - Detect and remove code that has no effect or is never executed
- CERT, MSC12-CPP. - Detect and remove code that has no effect