File base_schedule.py
has 1439 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
from __future__ import annotations
import copy
import time
from enum import Enum
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
Function plan_solver
has a Cognitive Complexity of 169 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plan_solver(self):
plan = self.currentPlan
# 如果下个 普通任务 <10 分钟则跳过 plan
if (
next((e for e in self.tasks if 'type' not in e.keys() and e['time'] < datetime.now() + timedelta(seconds=600)),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function agent_get_mood
has a Cognitive Complexity of 111 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_get_mood(self,skip_dorm = False):
# 如果5分钟之内有任务则跳过心情读取
if next((k for k in self.tasks if k['time'] <datetime.now()+ timedelta(seconds=300)),None) is not None:
logger.info('有未完成的任务,跳过纠错')
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function agent_arrange
has a Cognitive Complexity of 111 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def agent_arrange(self, plan: tp.BasePlan, read_time_room=[]):
logger.info('基建:排班')
in_and_out = []
fia_room = ""
rooms = list(plan.keys())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function choose_agent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 69 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def choose_agent(self, agents: list[str], room: str) -> None:
"""
:param order: ArrangeOrder, 选择干员时右上角的排序功能
"""
first_name = ''
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_swap_plan
has a Cognitive Complexity of 53 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_swap_plan(self, resting_dorm, operators, skip_read_time):
result = {}
agents = copy.deepcopy(operators)
# 替换计划
for a in operators:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function plan_metadata
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def plan_metadata(self, time_result):
group_info = self.task['metadata']['plan']
read_time_rooms = self.task['metadata']['room']
if time_result is None:
time_result = {}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get_agent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 40 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_agent(self):
plan = self.currentPlan
high_production = []
replacements = []
for room in plan.keys():
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
BaseSchedulerSolver
has 44 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class BaseSchedulerSolver(BaseSolver):
"""
收集基建的产物:物资、赤金、信赖
"""
Function get_agent_from_room
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_agent_from_room(self, room, read_time_index=[]):
error_count = 0
if room == 'meeting':
time.sleep(3)
while self.find('room_detail') is None:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function maa_plan_solver
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def maa_plan_solver(self):
try:
if self.maa_config['last_execution'] is not None and datetime.now() - timedelta(seconds=self.maa_config['maa_execution_gap']*3600)< self.maa_config['last_execution']:
logger.info("间隔未超过设定时间,不启动maa")
else:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function infra_main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def infra_main(self):
""" 位于基建首页 """
if self.find('control_central') is None:
self.back()
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function recog_view_mask_right
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recog_view_mask_right(self) -> int:
""" 识别线索视图中右边黑色 mask 边缘的位置 """
x3 = x2
while True:
max_abs = 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function overtake_room
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def overtake_room(self):
name = self.task['type']
candidate = []
if self.operators[name]['group'] != '':
candidate.extend([v['name'] for k, v in self.operators.items() if
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clue(self) -> None:
# 一些识别时会用到的参数
global x1, x2, x3, x4, y0, y1, y2
x1, x2, x3, x4 = 0, 0, 0, 0
y0, y1, y2 = 0, 0, 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function read_screen
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_screen(self,img, type="mood",limit=24, cord=None, change_color=False):
if cord is not None:
img = img[cord[1]:cord[3], cord[0]:cord[2]]
if 'mood' in type or type == "time":
# 心情图片太小,复制8次提高准确率
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drone
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def drone(self, room: str, one_time=False, not_return=False):
logger.info('基建:无人机加速')
# 点击进入该房间
self.enter_room(room)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function scan_agant
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scan_agant(self, agent: list[str], error_count=0, max_agent_count=-1):
try:
# 识别干员
self.recog.update()
ret = character_recognize.agent(self.recog.img) # 返回的顺序是从左往右从上往下
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function ori_clue
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def ori_clue(self):
""" 获取界面内有多少线索 """
clues = []
y3 = y1
status = -2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function transition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transition(self) -> None:
self.recog.update()
if self.scene() == Scene.INDEX:
self.tap_element('index_infrastructure')
elif self.scene() == Scene.INFRA_MAIN:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function clear_clue_mask
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clear_clue_mask(self) -> None:
""" 清空界面内被选中的线索 """
try:
while True:
mask = False
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if _room not in result.keys():
result[_room] = ['Current'] * len(self.currentPlan[_room])
result[_room][self.operators[_item_name]['index']] = _item_name
Function read_time
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_time(self, cord, upperlimit, error_count=0):
# 刷新图片
self.recog.update()
time_str = segment.read_screen(self.recog.img, type='time', cord=cord)
logger.debug(str(time_str))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for current_idx, _name in enumerate(plan[room]):
if _name == 'Current':
current_name = self.current_base[room][current_idx]["agent"]
if current_name in agent_list:
plan[room][current_idx] = current_name
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if min_mood == -99:
min_mood = agent['mood']
break
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
for x in group_resting:
if self.operators[x['agent']]['resting_priority'] == 'low':
continue
else:
group_restingCount += 1
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if a == "Current":
continue
elif 'exhaust_require' in self.operators[a].keys() and self.operators[a]['exhaust_require']:
ignore.append(a)
resting_dorm.extend([self.operators[a]['current_room'] for a in ignore])
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if dorm not in read_time_rooms:
continue
if dorm in time_result.keys() and min_time > time_result[dorm]:
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if group_restingCount + actuall_resting <= self.dorm_count:
need_to_rest.extend(group_resting)
actuall_resting += group_restingCount
else:
# 因为人数不够而跳过记录心情
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if dorm in time_result.keys() and min_time > time_result[dorm]:
min_time = time_result[dorm]
_plan["time"] = min_time
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if k not in existing_plan['plan']:
existing_plan['plan'][k] = _plan['plan'][k]
else:
for idx, _a in enumerate(_plan['plan'][k]):
if _plan['plan'][k][idx] != 'Current':
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if next((e for e in self.tasks if 'type' in e.keys() and e['type'] == agent['agent']),
None) is None:
__agent = self.operators[agent['agent']]
self.enter_room(__agent['current_room'])
result = self.get_agent_from_room(__agent['current_room'], [__agent['current_index']])
Function read_screen
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read_screen(self,img, type="mood",limit=24, cord=None, change_color=False):
Function get_clue_mask
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_clue_mask(self) -> None:
""" 界面内是否有被选中的线索 """
try:
mask = []
for y in range(y1, y2):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handle_error
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def handle_error(self,force = False):
# 如果有任何报错,则生成一个空
if self.scene() == Scene.UNKNOWN:
self.device.exit('com.hypergryph.arknights')
if self.error or force:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function check_in_and_out
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_in_and_out(self):
res = {}
for x, y in self.currentPlan.items():
if not x.startswith('room'): continue
if any(('但书' in obj['replacement'] or '龙舌兰' in obj['replacement']) for obj in y):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 53 to the 15 allowed. Open
def plan_metadata(self, time_result):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 20 to the 15 allowed. Open
def clue(self) -> None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 70 to the 15 allowed. Open
def choose_agent(self, agents: list[str], room: str) -> None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 37 to the 15 allowed. Open
def get_agent_from_room(self, room, read_time_index=[]):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 33 to the 15 allowed. Open
def maa_plan_solver(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 112 to the 15 allowed. Open
def agent_get_mood(self,skip_dorm = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 50 to the 15 allowed. Open
def get_agent(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 20 to the 15 allowed. Open
def drone(self, room: str, one_time=False, not_return=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 56 to the 15 allowed. Open
def get_swap_plan(self, resting_dorm, operators, skip_read_time):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 20 to the 15 allowed. Open
def read_screen(self,img, type="mood",limit=24, cord=None, change_color=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 113 to the 15 allowed. Open
def agent_arrange(self, plan: tp.BasePlan, read_time_room=[]):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 27 to the 15 allowed. Open
def overtake_room(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 177 to the 15 allowed. Open
def plan_solver(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 28 to the 15 allowed. Open
def infra_main(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Refactor this function to reduce its Cognitive Complexity from 26 to the 15 allowed. Open
def recog_view_mask_right(self) -> int:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how hard the control flow of a function is to understand. Functions with high Cognitive Complexity will be difficult to maintain.
See
Merge this if statement with the enclosing one. Open
if len(select_name) >= max_agent_count:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Merging collapsible if
statements increases the code's readability.
Noncompliant Code Example
if condition1: if condition2: # ...
Compliant Solution
if condition1 and condition2: # ...
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
time_p = [((1650, 270, 1780, 305)), ((1650, 480, 1780, 515)), ((1650, 690, 1780, 725)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
time_p = [((1650, 270, 1780, 305)), ((1650, 480, 1780, 515)), ((1650, 690, 1780, 725)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
mood_p = [((1685, 213, 1780, 256)), ((1685, 422, 1780, 465)), ((1685, 632, 1780, 675)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
mood_p = [((1685, 213, 1780, 256)), ((1685, 422, 1780, 465)), ((1685, 632, 1780, 675)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
mood_p = [((1685, 213, 1780, 256)), ((1685, 422, 1780, 465)), ((1685, 632, 1780, 675)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
((1685, 612, 1780, 655)), ((1685, 822, 1780, 865))]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Merge this if statement with the enclosing one. Open
if 'replacement' in self.operators['菲亚梅塔'].keys():
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Merging collapsible if
statements increases the code's readability.
Noncompliant Code Example
if condition1: if condition2: # ...
Compliant Solution
if condition1 and condition2: # ...
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
time_p = [((1650, 270, 1780, 305)), ((1650, 480, 1780, 515)), ((1650, 690, 1780, 725)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
((1650, 665, 1780, 700)), ((1650, 875, 1780, 910))]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
((1685, 612, 1780, 655)), ((1685, 822, 1780, 865))]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Merge this if statement with the enclosing one. Open
if next((k for k, v in self.operators.items() if
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Merging collapsible if
statements increases the code's readability.
Noncompliant Code Example
if condition1: if condition2: # ...
Compliant Solution
if condition1 and condition2: # ...
Remove those useless parentheses. Open
((1650, 665, 1780, 700)), ((1650, 875, 1780, 910))]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
The use of parentheses, even those not required to enforce a desired order of operations, can clarify the intent behind a piece of code. But redundant pairs of parentheses could be misleading, and should be removed.
Noncompliant Code Example
return ((3)) # Noncompliant return ((x + 1)) # Noncompliant x = ((y / 2)) + 1 # Noncompliant
Compliant Solution
return 3 return (3) return x + 1 return (x + 1) x = y / 2 + 1 x = (y / 2) + 1
Merge this if statement with the enclosing one. Open
if ("LowerLimit" in self.agent_base_config[current_base[key][idx]["agent"]]):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Merging collapsible if
statements increases the code's readability.
Noncompliant Code Example
if condition1: if condition2: # ...
Compliant Solution
if condition1 and condition2: # ...
Merge this if statement with the enclosing one. Open
if '.' in __str:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Merging collapsible if
statements increases the code's readability.
Noncompliant Code Example
if condition1: if condition2: # ...
Compliant Solution
if condition1 and condition2: # ...
Remove the code after this "return". Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Jump statements (return
, break
, continue
, and raise
) move control flow out of the current code
block. Typically, any statements in a block that come after a jump are simply wasted keystrokes lying in wait to confuse the unwary.
Noncompliant Code Example
def fun(a): i = 10 return i + a # Noncompliant i += 1 # this is never executed
Compliant Solution
def fun(a): i = 10 return i + a
See
- MISRA C:2004, 14.1 - There shall be no unreachable code
- MISRA C++:2008, 0-1-1 - A project shall not contain unreachable code
- MISRA C++:2008, 0-1-9 - There shall be no dead code
- MISRA C:2012, 2.1 - A project shall not contain unreachable code
- MISRA C:2012, 2.2 - There shall be no dead code
- MITRE, CWE-561 - Dead Code
- CERT, MSC56-J. - Detect and remove superfluous code and values
- CERT, MSC12-C. - Detect and remove code that has no effect or is never executed
- CERT, MSC07-CPP. - Detect and remove dead code
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if (key == 'train'): continue
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
__high['name']].keys() and self.agent_base_config[__high['name']]['RestingPriority'] == 'low':
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
__high['name']].keys() and self.agent_base_config[__high['name']]['RestInFull'] == True:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Blank line contains whitespace Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Trailing whitespace is superfluous.
The warning returned varies on whether the line itself is blank,
for easier filtering for those who want to indent their blank lines.
Okay: spam(1)\n#
W291: spam(1) \n#
W293: class Foo(object):\n \n bang = 12
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if retry_count > 3: raise Exception(f"到达最大尝试次数 3次")
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if data['agent']in ['菲亚梅塔','刻俄柏']:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if drone_count < 100 or drone_count ==200:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if len(agent) == 0: break
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace around operator Open
error_count+=1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if res>upperlimit:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if length > 3: self.swipe((self.recog.w * 0.8, self.recog.h * 0.8), (0, self.recog.h * 0.4), interval=1,
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Whitespace before ':' Open
'current_room'] == room and _operator not in [res['agent'] for res in result] :
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace.
Avoid extraneous whitespace in these situations:
- Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces.
- Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon.
Okay: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam( ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[ 1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[1], { eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2} )
E202: spam(ham[1 ], {eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2 })
E203: if x == 4: print x, y; x, y = y , x
E203: if x == 4: print x, y ; x, y = y, x
E203: if x == 4 : print x, y; x, y = y, x
Too many leading '#' for block comment Open
## Maa
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
def agent_get_mood(self,skip_dorm = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Continuation line missing indentation or outdented Open
next((e for e in self.tasks if 'type' not in e.keys() and e['time'] < datetime.now() + timedelta(seconds=600)),
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Continuation line under-indented for visual indent Open
'room' in self.operators[agent[0]].keys() and self.operators[agent[0]]['room'].startswith(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
None)) is None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Comparison to true should be 'if cond is true:' or 'if cond:' Open
__high['name']].keys() and self.agent_base_config[__high['name']]['RestInFull'] == True:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Comparison to singletons should use "is" or "is not".
Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done
with "is" or "is not", never the equality operators.
Okay: if arg is not None:
E711: if arg != None:
E711: if None == arg:
E712: if arg == True:
E712: if False == arg:
Also, beware of writing if x when you really mean if x is not None
-- e.g. when testing whether a variable or argument that defaults to
None was set to some other value. The other value might have a type
(such as a container) that could be false in a boolean context!
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
def read_screen(self,img, type="mood",limit=24, cord=None, change_color=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
def agent_get_mood(self,skip_dorm = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
def agent_get_mood(self,skip_dorm = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if change_color: img[img == 137] = 255
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Whitespace before ':' Open
except Exception as e :
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace.
Avoid extraneous whitespace in these situations:
- Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces.
- Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon.
Okay: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam( ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[ 1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[1], { eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2} )
E202: spam(ham[1 ], {eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2 })
E203: if x == 4: print x, y; x, y = y , x
E203: if x == 4: print x, y ; x, y = y, x
E203: if x == 4 : print x, y; x, y = y, x
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
else :return res
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Do not use bare 'except' Open
except:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
When catching exceptions, mention specific exceptions when possible.
Okay: except Exception:
Okay: except BaseException:
E722: except:
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if any(room in obj["plan"].keys() and 'type' not in obj.keys() for obj in self.tasks): continue;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Continuation line missing indentation or outdented Open
self.operators[agent['agent']]['current_room'].startswith('dormitory'):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
__high['name']].keys():
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Multiple spaces after operator Open
res = int(h) * 3600 + int(m) * 60 + int(s)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace around an operator.
Okay: a = 12 + 3
E221: a = 4 + 5
E222: a = 4 + 5
E223: a = 4\t+ 5
E224: a = 4 +\t5
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
'dormitory')):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
'credit_fight':fights[len(fights)-1]!=''
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
'exhaust_require': False, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Expected 1 blank line, found 0 Open
def handle_error(self,force = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if error_count > 3: raise e
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
"index": -1, 'current_room': '', 'mood': 24, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
'current_room'] == room and _operator not in [res['agent'] for res in result] :
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if next((k for k in self.tasks if k['time'] <datetime.now()+ timedelta(seconds=300)),None) is not None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace after ':' Open
'exhaust_require': False, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
__high['name']].keys() and self.agent_base_config[__high['name']]['ExhaustRequire'] == True:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
'resting_priority': 'low', "index": -1, 'mood': 24, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
def read_screen(self,img, type="mood",limit=24, cord=None, change_color=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Whitespace before ':' Open
if 'mood' in type :
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace.
Avoid extraneous whitespace in these situations:
- Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces.
- Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon.
Okay: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam( ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[ 1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[1], { eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2} )
E202: spam(ham[1 ], {eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2 })
E203: if x == 4: print x, y; x, y = y , x
E203: if x == 4: print x, y ; x, y = y, x
E203: if x == 4 : print x, y; x, y = y, x
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if int(m)>60 or int(s)>60:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
return self.read_time(cord,upperlimit, error_count + 1)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
if data['agent']in ['菲亚梅塔','刻俄柏']:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
data['time'] = self.double_read_time(time_p[i],upperLimit=upperLimit)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if self.maa_config['last_execution'] is not None and datetime.now() - timedelta(seconds=self.maa_config['maa_execution_gap']*3600)< self.maa_config['last_execution']:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
if next((k for k in self.tasks if k['time'] <datetime.now()+ timedelta(seconds=300)),None) is not None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if '' in self.operators.keys(): self.operators['']['current_room'] = ''
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace around operator Open
result[fia_idx]['time'] =datetime.now()
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Continuation line missing indentation or outdented Open
'current_room'].startswith('dormitory'))) and obj not in ['但书', '龙舌兰']), None)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Test for membership should be 'not in' Open
if not group_name in group_info.keys():
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Negative comparison should be done using "not in" and "is not".
Okay: if x not in y:\n pass
Okay: assert (X in Y or X is Z)
Okay: if not (X in Y):\n pass
Okay: zz = x is not y
E713: Z = not X in Y
E713: if not X.B in Y:\n pass
E714: if not X is Y:\n pass
E714: Z = not X.B is Y
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if len(line_conf) == 0 and 'mood' in type: return -1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Whitespace before ':' Open
else :return res
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace.
Avoid extraneous whitespace in these situations:
- Immediately inside parentheses, brackets or braces.
- Immediately before a comma, semicolon, or colon.
Okay: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam( ham[1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[ 1], {eggs: 2})
E201: spam(ham[1], { eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2} )
E202: spam(ham[1 ], {eggs: 2})
E202: spam(ham[1], {eggs: 2 })
E203: if x == 4: print x, y; x, y = y , x
E203: if x == 4: print x, y ; x, y = y, x
E203: if x == 4 : print x, y; x, y = y, x
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if len(agent) == 0: break;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
def handle_error(self,force = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if next((k for k in self.tasks if k['time'] <datetime.now()+ timedelta(seconds=300)),None) is not None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
time_result = self.get_agent_from_room(self.operators[agent]['current_room'],[__index])
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Too many blank lines (2) Open
def initialize_paddle(self):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if int(m)>60 or int(s)>60:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if not_return: return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Statement ends with a semicolon Open
if len(agent) == 0: break;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Continuation line missing indentation or outdented Open
self.operators[_item_name]['room'].startswith(
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Missing whitespace after ':' Open
"index": -1, 'current_room': '', 'mood': 24, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if i['name'] in self.exaust_agent: continue
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Multiple statements on one line (colon) Open
if not x.startswith('room'): continue
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace around operator Open
while i>=3 and data['agent'] !='' and (next((e for e in result if e['agent'] == data['agent']), None)) is not None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if back_count>3:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
_plan= self.maa_config['weekly_plan'][get_server_weekday()]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
'stationary_security_service']:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Missing whitespace after ':' Open
'credit_fight':fights[len(fights)-1]!=''
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace after ',' Open
def handle_error(self,force = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals Open
def handle_error(self,force = False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign in function arguments.
Don't use spaces around the '=' sign when used to indicate a
keyword argument or a default parameter value, except when
using a type annotation.
Okay: def complex(real, imag=0.0):
Okay: return magic(r=real, i=imag)
Okay: boolean(a == b)
Okay: boolean(a != b)
Okay: boolean(a <= b)
Okay: boolean(a >= b)
Okay: def foo(arg: int = 42):
Okay: async def foo(arg: int = 42):
E251: def complex(real, imag = 0.0):
E251: return magic(r = real, i = imag)
E252: def complex(real, image: float=0.0):
Comparison to true should be 'if cond is true:' or 'if cond:' Open
__high['name']].keys() and self.agent_base_config[__high['name']]['ExhaustRequire'] == True:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Comparison to singletons should use "is" or "is not".
Comparisons to singletons like None should always be done
with "is" or "is not", never the equality operators.
Okay: if arg is not None:
E711: if arg != None:
E711: if None == arg:
E712: if arg == True:
E712: if False == arg:
Also, beware of writing if x when you really mean if x is not None
-- e.g. when testing whether a variable or argument that defaults to
None was set to some other value. The other value might have a type
(such as a container) that could be false in a boolean context!
Missing whitespace after ':' Open
'resting_priority': 'low', "index": -1, 'mood': 24, "upper_limit": 24,"rest_in_full":False}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Continuation line under-indented for visual indent Open
'exhaust_require' in v.keys() and v["exhaust_require"]]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Blank line contains whitespace Open
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Trailing whitespace is superfluous.
The warning returned varies on whether the line itself is blank,
for easier filtering for those who want to indent their blank lines.
Okay: spam(1)\n#
W291: spam(1) \n#
W293: class Foo(object):\n \n bang = 12
Missing whitespace around operator Open
back_count+=1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
class ArrangeOrder(Enum):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Statement ends with a semicolon Open
if any(room in obj["plan"].keys() and 'type' not in obj.keys() for obj in self.tasks): continue;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Missing whitespace after ':' Open
else :return res
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Each comma, semicolon or colon should be followed by whitespace.
Okay: [a, b]
Okay: (3,)
Okay: a[1:4]
Okay: a[:4]
Okay: a[1:]
Okay: a[1:4:2]
E231: ['a','b']
E231: foo(bar,baz)
E231: [{'a':'b'}]
Missing whitespace around operator Open
while i>=3 and data['agent'] !='' and (next((e for e in result if e['agent'] == data['agent']), None)) is not None:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)
Missing whitespace around operator Open
if error_count>4:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Surround operators with a single space on either side.
- Always surround these binary operators with a single space on
either side: assignment (=), augmented assignment (+=, -= etc.),
comparisons (==, <, >, !=, <=, >=, in, not in, is, is not),
Booleans (and, or, not).
- If operators with different priorities are used, consider adding
whitespace around the operators with the lowest priorities.
Okay: i = i + 1
Okay: submitted += 1
Okay: x = x * 2 - 1
Okay: hypot2 = x * x + y * y
Okay: c = (a + b) * (a - b)
Okay: foo(bar, key='word', *args, **kwargs)
Okay: alpha[:-i]
E225: i=i+1
E225: submitted +=1
E225: x = x /2 - 1
E225: z = x **y
E225: z = 1and 1
E226: c = (a+b) * (a-b)
E226: hypot2 = x*x + y*y
E227: c = a|b
E228: msg = fmt%(errno, errmsg)