Showing 24 of 24 total issues
Function AddProductToTable
has 198 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const AddProductToTable = (props, history) => {
const classes = useStyles();
const [stores, setStores] = useState("");
const data = scalableData(props.garment);
const [product, setProduct] = useState({
Function NavBar
has a Cognitive Complexity of 38 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const NavBar = ({ hidden, history, location }) => {
const classes = useStyles();
const dispatch = useDispatch();
const { loginWithRedirect, logout } = useAuth0();
const { pathname } = location;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File LearnMore.js
has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import React from 'react';
import styled from 'styled-components';
import BoardRoom from '../images/BoardRoom.jpg';
import OurTeam from '../images/OurTeam.jpg';
File Styled.js
has 279 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import styled from "styled-components";
export const MainContainer = styled.div`
background: #e5e5e5;
height: 1024px;
Function DevAuth
has 90 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const DevAuth = () => {
const history = useHistory()
const [credentials, setCredentials] = useState({
email: '',
password: ''
File NavBar.js
has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
import React, { useState, useEffect } from "react";
import { connect, useDispatch } from "react-redux";
import { withRouter, Link } from "react-router-dom";
import { axiosWithAuth } from "../utils/axiosWithAuth";
// components
Function Nav
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const Nav = () => {
if (!!localStorage.getItem("profile")) {
return (
<nav className={classes.ButtonWrapper}>
{window.location.pathname === `/${store_name}` ? (
Function Settings
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const Settings = () => {
let connectStripeURL;
if (process.env.REACT_APP_BASE_URL === "development") {
connectStripeURL = "http://localhost:3000/stripe-setup";
} else {
Function ProductReducer
has 78 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const ProductReducer = (state = initialState, action) =>{
switch (action.type) {
case GET_PRODUCTS_START:
return {
...state,
Function FAQ
has 77 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const FAQ = () =>{
const classes = useStyles();
return (
<div className={classes.root}>
Function ShippingAddress
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const ShippingAddress = () => {
const dispatch = useDispatch();
const history = useHistory();
const classes = useStyles();
const [address, setAddress] = useState(initialQuoteState.sendQuote.spInfo.address)
Function LearnMore
has 69 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const LearnMore = () => {
return (
<PageWrapper>
<TopImage>
Function StripeConnect
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const StripeConnect = () => {
const [queryString, setQueryString] = useState(window.location.search);
let stripeConnected = false;
let stripeError = false;
const [activeStep, setActiveStep] = useState(1);
Function QuoteReducer
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export const QuoteReducer = (state = initialQuoteState, action) => {
switch(action.type){
case GET_QUOTE_START:
return{
...state,
Function App
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function App() {
const [design, setDesign] = useState(initialShirtState.designInfo);
const [garment, setGarment] = useState(initialShirtState.garment);
const [product, setProduct] = useState(initialState.products)
const [thumbRender, setThumbRender] = useState();
Function CheckoutPage
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const CheckoutPage = ({
cart,
total,
match,
addItem,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
price: null
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
products:
{
id: "",
productName: "",
color: "",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function parseURLParams
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
export default function parseURLParams(url) {
var queryStart = url.indexOf("?") + 1,
queryEnd = url.indexOf("#") + 1 || url.length + 1,
query = url.slice(queryStart, queryEnd - 1),
pairs = query.replace(/\+/g, " ").split("&"),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function Settings
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
const Settings = () => {
let connectStripeURL;
if (process.env.REACT_APP_BASE_URL === "development") {
connectStripeURL = "http://localhost:3000/stripe-setup";
} else {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"