File SearchResultImpl.java has 489 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
*/
package eu.learnpad.transformations.metamodel_corpus.xwiki.impl;
import javax.xml.datatype.XMLGregorianCalendar;SearchResultImpl has 46 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class SearchResultImpl extends LinkCollectionImpl implements SearchResult {
/**
* The default value of the '{@link #getType() <em>Type</em>}' attribute.
* <!-- begin-user-doc -->
* <!-- end-user-doc -->Method eIsSet has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean eIsSet(int featureID) {
switch (featureID) {
case XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__TYPE:
return TYPE_EDEFAULT == null ? type != null : !TYPE_EDEFAULT.equals(type);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method eUnset has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void eUnset(int featureID) {
switch (featureID) {
case XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__TYPE:
setType(TYPE_EDEFAULT);Method eSet has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void eSet(int featureID, Object newValue) {
switch (featureID) {
case XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__TYPE:
setType((String)newValue);Method eIsSet has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean eIsSet(int featureID) {
switch (featureID) {
case XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__TYPE:
return TYPE_EDEFAULT == null ? type != null : !TYPE_EDEFAULT.equals(type);Method eGet has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public Object eGet(int featureID, boolean resolve, boolean coreType) {
switch (featureID) {
case XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__TYPE:
return getType();Method toString has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public String toString() {
if (eIsProxy()) return super.toString();
StringBuffer result = new StringBuffer(super.toString());Method setObject has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void setObject(eu.learnpad.transformations.metamodel_corpus.xwiki.Object newObject) {
if (newObject != object) {
NotificationChain msgs = null;
if (object != null)
msgs = ((InternalEObject)object).eInverseRemove(this, EOPPOSITE_FEATURE_BASE - XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__OBJECT, null, msgs);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Avoid too many return statements within this method. Open
return;Method toString has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public String toString() {
if (eIsProxy()) return super.toString();
StringBuffer result = new StringBuffer(super.toString());- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void setObject(eu.learnpad.transformations.metamodel_corpus.xwiki.Object newObject) {
if (newObject != object) {
NotificationChain msgs = null;
if (object != null)
msgs = ((InternalEObject)object).eInverseRemove(this, EOPPOSITE_FEATURE_BASE - XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__OBJECT, null, msgs);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 144.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 12 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public NotificationChain basicSetObject(eu.learnpad.transformations.metamodel_corpus.xwiki.Object newObject, NotificationChain msgs) {
eu.learnpad.transformations.metamodel_corpus.xwiki.Object oldObject = object;
object = newObject;
if (eNotificationRequired()) {
ENotificationImpl notification = new ENotificationImpl(this, Notification.SET, XwikiPackage.SEARCH_RESULT__OBJECT, oldObject, newObject);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 77.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void setScore(float newScore) {
float oldScore = score;
score = newScore;
boolean oldScoreESet = scoreESet;
scoreESet = true;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void setObjectNumber(int newObjectNumber) {
int oldObjectNumber = objectNumber;
objectNumber = newObjectNumber;
boolean oldObjectNumberESet = objectNumberESet;
objectNumberESet = true;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void unsetObjectNumber() {
int oldObjectNumber = objectNumber;
boolean oldObjectNumberESet = objectNumberESet;
objectNumber = OBJECT_NUMBER_EDEFAULT;
objectNumberESet = false;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 10 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void unsetScore() {
float oldScore = score;
boolean oldScoreESet = scoreESet;
score = SCORE_EDEFAULT;
scoreESet = false;- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76