LearnPAd/learnpad

View on GitHub
lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

Method init has a Cognitive Complexity of 216 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
  public Resource init() throws ResourceInstantiationException {
    // list of namespaces to be ignored when creating gazetteer list
    List<String> nsToIgnore = new ArrayList<String>();

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method init has 306 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("deprecation")
  public Resource init() throws ResourceInstantiationException {
    // list of namespaces to be ignored when creating gazetteer list
    List<String> nsToIgnore = new ArrayList<String>();

    File OntoRootGaz.java has 653 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    /*
     * OntoRootGaz.java
     * 
     * Copyright (c) 1998-2008, The University of Sheffield.
     * 

      Method runRootFinderApplication has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        private List<Lookup> runRootFinderApplication(List<Lookup> lookups)
            throws ResourceInstantiationException {
          Pattern p = Pattern.compile(CATConstants.REGEX_CAMEL_CASE);
          List<Lookup> lookupsToBeReturned = new ArrayList<Lookup>();
          for(Lookup lookup : lookups) {

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method addLookups has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        protected void addLookups(List<Lookup> lookups)
            throws ResourceInstantiationException {
          List<Lookup> lookupsToBeAdded = runRootFinderApplication(lookups);
          List<Lookup> additionalListTemp = new ArrayList<Lookup>();
          additionalListTemp.addAll(additionalList);

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method runRootFinderApplication has 97 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        private List<Lookup> runRootFinderApplication(List<Lookup> lookups)
            throws ResourceInstantiationException {
          Pattern p = Pattern.compile(CATConstants.REGEX_CAMEL_CASE);
          List<Lookup> lookupsToBeReturned = new ArrayList<Lookup>();
          for(Lookup lookup : lookups) {

        OntoRootGaz has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

        @CreoleResource(name = "Onto Root Gazetteer",
            comment = "An ontology lookup component",
            helpURL = "http://gate.ac.uk/userguide/sec:gazetteers:ontoRootGaz",
            icon = "gazetteer")
        public class OntoRootGaz extends DefaultGazetteer {

          Method addLookups has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            protected void addLookups(List<Lookup> lookups)
                throws ResourceInstantiationException {
              List<Lookup> lookupsToBeAdded = runRootFinderApplication(lookups);
              List<Lookup> additionalListTemp = new ArrayList<Lookup>();
              additionalListTemp.addAll(additionalList);

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                          if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                              .contains(propUri))
                              && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                  .contains(propUri)))) {
                            if(!nsToIgnore.contains(uriUri.getNameSpace())) {

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                          for(Object key : aLookup.features.keySet()) {
                            anotherFeatures.put((String)key, aLookup.features.get(key));
                          }

                Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                Open

                              if(uri.startsWith("_"))
                                uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, true);
                              else uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, false);

                  Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                  Open

                                if(uri.startsWith("_"))
                                  uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, true);
                                else uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, false);

                    Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                    Open

                                if(ann.getType().equals(ANNIEConstants.TOKEN_ANNOTATION_TYPE)) {
                                  lastAnnWasSpace = false;
                                  String category =
                                      (String)ann.getFeatures().get(
                                          ANNIEConstants.TOKEN_CATEGORY_FEATURE_NAME);

                      Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                      Open

                                    if(l == null) l = new HashSet<String>();

                        Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                        Open

                                      if(uri.startsWith("_")) {
                                        uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, true);
                                        classType = "bNode";
                                      } else {
                                        uriUri = new gate.creole.ontology.URI(uri, false);

                          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                          Open

                                        if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                                            .contains(propUri))
                                            && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                                .contains(propUri)))) {
                                          if(!nsToIgnore.contains(uriUri.getNameSpace())) {

                            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                            Open

                                          if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                                              .contains(propUri))
                                              && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                                  .contains(propUri)))) {
                                            if(!nsToIgnore.contains(uriUri.getNameSpace())) {

                              Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                            if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                                                .contains(propUri))
                                                && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                                    .contains(propUri)))) {
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 281..284
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 346..349

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 42.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                            if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                                                .contains(propUri))
                                                && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                                    .contains(propUri)))) {
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 346..349
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 391..394

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 42.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                              Open

                                            if((propertiesToIncludeList.size() == 0 || propertiesToIncludeList
                                                .contains(propUri))
                                                && (propertiesToExcludeList.size() == 0 || !(propertiesToExcludeList
                                                    .contains(propUri)))) {
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 281..284
                              lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Gazetteer_Ontology_Based/src/gate/clone/ql/OntoRootGaz.java on lines 391..394

                              Duplicated Code

                              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                              Tuning

                              This issue has a mass of 42.

                              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                              Refactorings

                              Further Reading

                              There are no issues that match your filters.

                              Category
                              Status