Sign upLogin

LearnPAd/learnpad

View on GitHub
Star
lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
1 wk
Test Coverage

File AnnotationEditor.java has 1007 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

package gate.creole.ontology.ocat;

import gate.Annotation;
import gate.Factory;
import gate.FeatureMap;
Severity: Major
Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 2 days to fix

    Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 44 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ie) {
      // if(ie.getStateChange() != 1) return;
      if(explicitCall) return;
      if(newAnnotationMode) {
        Object selectedItem = typeCombo.getSelectedItem();
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method showWindow has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      private void showWindow() {

    // and lets show it
    final JTextArea textComp = ontologyTreePanel.ontoViewer.documentTextArea;
    int x1 = textComp.getSelectionStart();
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 6 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method initGUI has 150 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      private void initGUI() {
    annotationWindow =
      new JWindow(
        SwingUtilities
          .getWindowAncestor(ontologyTreePanel.ontoViewer.documentTextualDocumentView
    Severity: Major
    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 6 hrs to fix

      Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) {

    int[] range = ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.annotationRange;
    int index1 = -1;
    ArrayList<Integer> indexes = new ArrayList<Integer>();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 5 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method actionPerformed has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ie) {
      // if(ie.getStateChange() != 1) return;
      if(explicitCall) return;
      if(newAnnotationMode) {
        Object selectedItem = typeCombo.getSelectedItem();
      Severity: Major
      Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 4 hrs to fix

        Method showWindow has 111 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          private void showWindow() {

    // and lets show it
    final JTextArea textComp = ontologyTreePanel.ontoViewer.documentTextArea;
    int x1 = textComp.getSelectionStart();
        Severity: Major
        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 4 hrs to fix

          Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {
        if(ontologyTreePanel.ontologyViewerOptions.getDeleteConfirmation()) {
          Object[] options = new Object[]{"YES", "NO"};
          int confirm =
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 4 hrs to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method actionPerformed has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) {

    int[] range = ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.annotationRange;
    int index1 = -1;
    ArrayList<Integer> indexes = new ArrayList<Integer>();
          Severity: Major
          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 3 hrs to fix

            Method actionPerformed has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {
        if(ontologyTreePanel.ontologyViewerOptions.getDeleteConfirmation()) {
          Object[] options = new Object[]{"YES", "NO"};
          int confirm =
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

              Method getSimilarAnnotations has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                private ArrayList<Annotation> getSimilarAnnotations(gate.Annotation annot) {
    ArrayList<Annotation> annotations = new ArrayList<Annotation>();
    String classValue =
      Utils
        .getClassFeatureValue(annot, ontologyTreePanel.ontologyViewerOptions);
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method getClassesAndInstances has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                private ArrayList<ClassNode> getClassesAndInstances(IFolder rootNode,
    String startWith) {

    ArrayList<ClassNode> toReturn = new ArrayList<ClassNode>();
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method actionPerformed has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {
        gate.Annotation annot =
          ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
            .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                Method actionPerformed has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {
        gate.Annotation annot =
          ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
            .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                  Method getSimilarAnnotations has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                    private ArrayList<Annotation> getSimilarAnnotations(gate.Annotation annot) {
    ArrayList<Annotation> annotations = new ArrayList<Annotation>();
    String classValue =
      Utils
        .getClassFeatureValue(annot, ontologyTreePanel.ontologyViewerOptions);
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                    Method actionPerformed has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                        public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {

        if(!deHighlight.isSelected()) { return; }
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                      Method actionPerformed has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                          public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      gate.Annotation annot =
        ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
          .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
      int startOffset = annot.getStartNode().getOffset().intValue();
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                        Method actionPerformed has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {

      gate.Annotation annot =
        ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
          .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

                          Method isValidDomain has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                            private boolean isValidDomain(RDFProperty aProp, OInstance inst) {
    Set<OResource> domain = aProp.getDomain();
    if(domain == null || domain.isEmpty()) return true;
    ClassNode inode = ontologyTreePanel.getFirstNode(inst.getName());
    for(OResource res : domain) {
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 55 mins to fix

                          Cognitive Complexity

                          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                          Further reading

                          Method isValidRange has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                          Open

                            private boolean isValidRange(RDFProperty aProp, OInstance inst) {
    Set<OResource> range = aProp.getRange();
    if(range == null || range.isEmpty()) return true;
    ClassNode inode = ontologyTreePanel.getFirstNode(inst.getName());
    for(OResource res : range) {
                          Severity: Minor
                          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 55 mins to fix

                          Cognitive Complexity

                          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                          Further reading

                          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
                          Open

                                          for(int i = 0; i < annotations.size(); i++) {
                  ontologyTreePanel.deleteAnnotation(annotations.get(i));
                }
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 45 mins to fix

                            Method getInstances has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                            Open

                              private Set<OInstance> getInstances(IFolder rootNode) {
    Set<OInstance> toReturn = new HashSet<OInstance>();
    if(rootNode instanceof ClassNode
      && ((ClassNode)rootNode).getSource() instanceof OInstance) {
      if(ontologyTreePanel.ontologyViewerOptions
                            Severity: Minor
                            Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                            Cognitive Complexity

                            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                            Further reading

                            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                            Open

                                    return;
                            Severity: Major
                            Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 30 mins to fix

                              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                              Open

                                        return;
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 30 mins to fix

                                Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                                Open

                                          return;
                                Severity: Major
                                Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 30 mins to fix

                                  Method hasChild has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                    private boolean hasChild(ClassNode parent, ClassNode child) {
    if(parent == child) return true;
    if(parent.getChildCount() == 0) return false;
    Iterator iter = parent.getChildren();
    while(iter.hasNext()) {
                                  Severity: Minor
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 25 mins to fix

                                  Cognitive Complexity

                                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                                  Further reading

                                  Method actionPerformed has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                      public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {
      try {

        if(!deHighlight.isSelected()) { return; }
                                  Severity: Minor
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java - About 25 mins to fix

                                  Cognitive Complexity

                                  Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                                  A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                                  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                                  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                                  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                                  Further reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                        try {
        gate.Annotation annot =
          ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
            .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
        int startOffset = annot.getStartNode().getOffset().intValue();
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 852..884

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 219.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                      public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent e) {

      gate.Annotation annot =
        ontologyTreePanel.ontoTreeListener.highlightedAnnotations
          .get(selectedAnnotationIndex);
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 895..927

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 219.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                    private boolean isValidDomain(RDFProperty aProp, OInstance inst) {
    Set<OResource> domain = aProp.getDomain();
    if(domain == null || domain.isEmpty()) return true;
    ClassNode inode = ontologyTreePanel.getFirstNode(inst.getName());
    for(OResource res : domain) {
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 617..629

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 111.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                    private boolean isValidRange(RDFProperty aProp, OInstance inst) {
    Set<OResource> range = aProp.getRange();
    if(range == null || range.isEmpty()) return true;
    ClassNode inode = ontologyTreePanel.getFirstNode(inst.getName());
    for(OResource res : range) {
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 593..604

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 111.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                              if(annot != null) {
              if(applyToAll.isSelected()) {
                ArrayList<Annotation> annotations =
                  getSimilarAnnotations(annot);
                for(int i = 0; i < annotations.size(); i++) {
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 727..737

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 72.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                            if(annot != null) {
            if(applyToAll.isSelected()) {
              ArrayList<Annotation> annotations = getSimilarAnnotations(annot);
              for(int i = 0; i < annotations.size(); i++) {
                ontologyTreePanel.deleteAnnotation(annotations.get(i));
                                  Severity: Major
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 707..718

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 72.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                      if(isNewAnnotationMode) {
      deleteBtn.setEnabled(false);
      soelBtn.setEnabled(false);
      soerBtn.setEnabled(false);
      eoelBtn.setEnabled(false);
                                  Severity: Minor
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 323..331

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 58.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                  Open

                                      else {
      deleteBtn.setEnabled(true);
      soelBtn.setEnabled(true);
      soerBtn.setEnabled(true);
      eoelBtn.setEnabled(true);
                                  Severity: Minor
                                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                  lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/AnnotationEditor.java on lines 314..322

                                  Duplicated Code

                                  Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                  Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                  When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                  Tuning

                                  This issue has a mass of 58.

                                  We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                  The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                  If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                  See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                  Refactorings

                                  Further Reading

                                  There are no issues that match your filters.

                                  Category
                                  Status