Sign upLogin

LearnPAd/learnpad

View on GitHub
Star
lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
3 days
Test Coverage

File FeaturesEditor.java has 455 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 * Copyright (c) 1998-2005, The University of Sheffield.
 * 
 * This file is part of GATE (see http://gate.ac.uk/), and is free software,
 * licenced under the GNU Library General Public License, Version 2, June 1991
Severity: Minor
Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 6 hrs to fix

    Method prepareCombo has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        protected void prepareCombo(JComboBox combo, int row, int column) {
      Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(row);
      DefaultComboBoxModel comboModel = (DefaultComboBoxModel)combo.getModel();
      comboModel.removeAllElements();
      switch(column){
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 2 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    FeatureEditorRenderer has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      protected class FeatureEditorRenderer extends DefaultCellEditor implements
                                                                 TableCellRenderer {
    public FeatureEditorRenderer() {
      super(new JComboBox());
      defaultComparator = new ObjectComparator();
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 2 hrs to fix

      Method actionPerformed has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

              public void actionPerformed(ActionEvent ae) {
          int row = mainTable.getEditingRow();
          if(row < 0) return;
          Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(row);
          if(feature == emptyFeature) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

        Method prepareCombo has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            protected void prepareCombo(JComboBox combo, int row, int column) {
      Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(row);
      DefaultComboBoxModel comboModel = (DefaultComboBoxModel)combo.getModel();
      comboModel.removeAllElements();
      switch(column){
        Severity: Minor
        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Method initGUI has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            protected void initGUI() {
    featuresModel = new FeaturesTableModel();
    mainTable = new XJTable();
    mainTable.setModel(featuresModel);
    mainTable.setTableHeader(null);
          Severity: Minor
          Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Method populate has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

              protected void populate() {
    featureList.clear();

    // get all the existing features
    Set features = new HashSet();
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method setValueAt has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public void setValueAt(Object aValue, int rowIndex, int columnIndex) {
      Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(rowIndex);
      if(targetFeatures == null) {
        targetFeatures = Factory.newFeatureMap();
        populate();
            Severity: Minor
            Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 1 hr to fix

              Method getTableCellRendererComponent has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public Component getTableCellRendererComponent(JTable table, Object value,
      boolean isSelected, boolean hasFocus, int row, int column) {
      Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(row);
      switch(column){
        case ICON_COL:
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 55 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method getTableCellRendererComponent has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public Component getTableCellRendererComponent(JTable table, Object value,
      boolean isSelected, boolean hasFocus, int row, int column) {
              Severity: Minor
              Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 45 mins to fix

                Method repaint has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        public void repaint(long tm, int x, int y, int width, int height) {
                Severity: Minor
                Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                  Method getTableCellEditorComponent has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                  Open

                      public Component getTableCellEditorComponent(JTable table, Object value,
      boolean isSelected, int row, int column) {
                  Severity: Minor
                  Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                    Method repaint has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                    Open

                            public void repaint(long tm, int x, int y, int width, int height) {
                    Severity: Minor
                    Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                      Method repaint has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                      Open

                              public void repaint(long tm, int x, int y, int width, int height) {
                      Severity: Minor
                      Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                        Method setValueAt has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                            public void setValueAt(Object aValue, int rowIndex, int columnIndex) {
      Feature feature = (Feature)featureList.get(rowIndex);
      if(targetFeatures == null) {
        targetFeatures = Factory.newFeatureMap();
        populate();
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java - About 35 mins to fix

                        Cognitive Complexity

                        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                        Further reading

                        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                case VALUE_COL:
          if(feature.value instanceof List) {
            listItems.setText(feature.value.toString());
            return listPanel;
          }
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                        lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java on lines 463..471

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 46.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                        Open

                                case VALUE_COL:
          if(feature.value instanceof List) {
            listItems.setText(feature.value.toString());
            return listPanel;
          }
                        Severity: Minor
                        Found in lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
                        lp-ontology-recommender/src/main/resources/gate/plugins/Ontology_Tools/src/gate/creole/ontology/ocat/FeaturesEditor.java on lines 486..494

                        Duplicated Code

                        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                        Tuning

                        This issue has a mass of 46.

                        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                        Refactorings

                        Further Reading

                        There are no issues that match your filters.

                        Category
                        Status