Showing 41 of 41 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else if( (old_name.find(o => o.first_name && o.first_name.toLowerCase() === firstname) && lastname == "") || (old_name.find(o => o.last_name && o.last_name.toLowerCase() === lastname) && firstname == "") || (old_name.find(o => o.last_name && o.last_name.toLowerCase() === lastname) && old_name.find(o => o.first_name && o.first_name.toLowerCase() === firstname)) ){
rows += '<tr data-id="' + personId + '" data-orcid="' + orcid + '"><td><a href="' + librecat.uri_base + '/staffdirectory/' + personId + '" target="_blank">' + personId + '</a></td><td class="name" data-firstname="' + first_name + '" data-lastname="' + last_name + '"><a href="#" class="person_link">' + first_name + " " + last_name + '</a></td></tr>';
if(old_name[0]){
for(var j=0;j<old_name.length;j++){
var old_firstname = first_name;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 298.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if((firstname == first_name.toLowerCase() && lastname == "") || (lastname == last_name.toLowerCase() && firstname == "") || (lastname == last_name.toLowerCase() && firstname == first_name.toLowerCase())){
rows += '<tr data-id="' + personId + '" data-orcid="' + orcid + '"><td><a href="' + librecat.uri_base + '/staffdirectory/' + personId + '" target="_blank">' + personId + '</a></td><td class="name" data-firstname="' + first_name + '" data-lastname="' + last_name + '"><a href="#" class="person_link">' + first_name + " " + last_name + '</a></td></tr>';
if(old_name[0]){
for(var j=0;j<old_name.length;j++){
var old_firstname = first_name;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 298.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
File librecat.js
has 711 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
*
* handling mark/unmark
*
*/
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(cont).each(function(cindex){
var newindex = parseInt(cindex) + parseInt(index);
var current_container = $(this);
$(current_container).find('input, textarea, img, select, span').each(function(){
if($(this).attr('id')){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 268.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$(cont).each(function(cindex){
var newindex = parseInt(cindex) + parseInt(index);
var current_container = $(this);
$(current_container).find('input, textarea, img, select, span').each(function(){
if($(this).attr('id')){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 268.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function link_person
has 213 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function link_person(element){
var type = "";
type = $(element).attr('data-type');
var lineId = $(element).attr('id').replace(type + 'link_person_','');
Function init
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function() {
$('.dz-default.dz-message').addClass('col-md-11');
this.on("uploadprogress", function(file,progress,bytesSent){
$('html').css({ cursor: "wait" });
if (file['accepted'] === true) {
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if($(this).parent('div.sticky').hasClass('mandatory')){
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("-webkit-box-shadow", "inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 6px #d3d3d3");
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("box-shadow", "inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 6px #d3d3d3");
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("border", "1px solid #666");
$(this).css("box-shadow", "inset 0 1px 1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 6px -6px #d3d3d3");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else {
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("-webkit-box-shadow", "inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 8px rgba(102, 175, 233, 0.6)");
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("box-shadow","inset 0 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 8px rgba(102, 175, 233, 0.6)");
$(this).parent('div.sticky').css("border", "1px solid #66afe9");
$(this).css("box-shadow", "inset 0 1px 1px -1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.075), 0 0 8px -8px rgba(102, 175, 233, 0.6)");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 91.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function add_field
has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function add_field(name, placeholder){
var items = $('#' + name + ' div.row.multirow');
var index = items.index($('#' + name + ' div.row.multirow').last()) + 1;
var blueprint = $(items[0]).clone();
//var corrected_index = index;
Function link_person
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function link_person(element){
var type = "";
type = $(element).attr('data-type');
var lineId = $(element).attr('id').replace(type + 'link_person_','');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
success: function(res) {
$('.total-marked').text(res.total);
a.data('marked', 0);
a.children('span').removeClass('fa-check-square-o');
a.children('span').addClass('fa-square-o');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
success: function(res) {
$('.total-marked').text(res.total);
a.data('marked', 1);
a.children('span').removeClass('fa-square-o');
a.children('span').addClass('fa-check-square-o');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 80.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function edit_file
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function edit_file(fileId){
var json = jQuery.parseJSON($('#file_' + fileId).val());
if(json.file_id){
$('#id_file_id').val(json.file_id);
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
else if( (old_name.find(o => o.first_name && o.first_name.toLowerCase() === firstname) && lastname == "") || (old_name.find(o => o.last_name && o.last_name.toLowerCase() === lastname) && firstname == "") || (old_name.find(o => o.last_name && o.last_name.toLowerCase() === lastname) && old_name.find(o => o.first_name && o.first_name.toLowerCase() === firstname)) ){
rows += '<tr data-id="' + personId + '" data-orcid="' + orcid + '"><td><a href="' + librecat.uri_base + '/staffdirectory/' + personId + '" target="_blank">' + personId + '</a></td><td class="name" data-firstname="' + first_name + '" data-lastname="' + last_name + '"><a href="#" class="person_link">' + first_name + " " + last_name + '</a></td></tr>';
if(old_name[0]){
for(var j=0;j<old_name.length;j++){
var old_firstname = first_name;
Function edit_file
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function edit_file(fileId){
var json = jQuery.parseJSON($('#file_' + fileId).val());
if(json.file_id){
$('#id_file_id').val(json.file_id);
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function init
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
init: function(){
$('.dz-default.dz-message').addClass('qae');
this.on("addedfile", function(file) {
var fileName = Dropzone.createElement("<div class=\"row\"><div class=\"progress progress-striped active\"><div class=\"progress-bar\" id=\"" + htmlEscape(file.name) + "_progress\" style=\"width:0;text-align:left;padding-left:10px;\">" + file.name + "</span></div></div></div>");
file.previewElement.appendChild(fileName);
Function remove_field
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function remove_field(object){
var container = $(object).closest('div.multirow');
var index = $(container).index();
var total = $(container).parent().children('div.multirow').size();
Function enable_autocomplete
has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function enable_autocomplete(field, index) {
var type;
switch(field) {
case "pj":
type = "project"
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if($(this).attr('id') && $(this).attr('id').match(/idm_extern/)){
$(this).prop('checked', true);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 59.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76