Showing 32 of 32 total issues
Function validate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
validate(line) {
if (typeof line !== 'string') return false
const lineElement = line.split(' ')
if (lineElement.length != 2 && lineElement.length != 3) return false
if (isNaN(lineElement[1])) return false
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function get
has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
get(req, res) {
this.app.orm.Metric.findOne({
where: {
namespace: req.params.namespace,
precision: req.params.precision
Function schema
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static schema(app, Sequelize) {
return {
metric: {
type: Sequelize.BIGINT,
index: true,
Function writePoint
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
writePoint(point) {
return new Promise((fullfill, reject) => {
// TODO: Add Memory-cache Stat findOrCreate (for priming new Stat rows)
this.getMetricInstance(point)
Function getMetricInstance
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getMetricInstance(point) {
const cache = this.app.services.CacheService.getCaches()
return new Promise((fullfill, reject) => {
cache.get(this.getCacheKey(point), (error, metric) => {
Function write
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
write(req, res) {
new Promise((fullfill, reject) => {
if (!req.body)throw new ValidationError()
let lines = this.app.services.LineProtocolService.explode(req.body);
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (req.query.end) {
query.where.datetime["$lte"] = moment(req.query.end, "x").toDate()
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (req.query.start) {
query.where.datetime["$gte"] = moment(req.query.start, "x").toDate()
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 54.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
write(req, res) {
new Promise((fullfill, reject) => {
if (!req.body)throw new ValidationError()
let lines = this.app.services.LineProtocolService.explode(req.body);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (!this.testTimeFormat(timeDefinition[1])) return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (isNaN(timeDefinition[0])) return false
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
if (isNaN(timeDefinition[0])) return false
TODO found Open
* @description TODO document Controller.
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
* @description TODO document Controller.
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
* @description TODO document Controller.
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
// TODO: Remove ON CONFLICT and just use and UPDATE statement (if Stat findOrCreate is performed)
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
// TODO: Refactor into a Point class and a PointArray class
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
// TODO: Only accept full line (client must send complete lines)
- Exclude checks
TODO found Open
* @description TODO document Controller.
- Exclude checks