Showing 4 of 4 total issues
Method _change_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _change_value(key, attributes, new_value)
if key == 'text'
new_children = @children.select { |child| !child.is_a?(HashTML::Text) }
@children = new_children.empty? ? [HashTML::Text.new(new_value)] : [new_children, HashTML::Text.new(new_value)]
else- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _get_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_value(key, attributes={})
if key == 'text'
return @children.map { |child| child.text if child.is_a?(HashTML::Text) }.reject(&:nil?).join
else
@children.each do |child|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _get_value has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_value(key, attributes={})
return nil unless @root_node.name == key
return @root_node unless attributes
return ((@root_node.attributes and @root_node.attributes.include_pairs?(attributes)) ? @root_node : nil)
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method method_missing has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def method_missing(method, *args)
method = method.to_s
attributes, new_value, _nil = args
attributes ||= {}
if method.end_with?("?")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"