Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq-appliance_console

View on GitHub
Star
lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
2 hrs
Test Coverage
A
100%

Class Certificate has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Certificate
    STATUS_COMPLETE = :complete

    # map `getcert status` return codes to something more descriptive
    # 0 => :complete -- keys/certs generated
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Method request has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def request
      undo_tracking if complete?

      if should_request_key?
        principal.register
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Remove unnecessary existence check File.exist?.
Open

      FileUtils.rm_f(cert_filename) if File.exist?(cert_filename)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb by rubocop

Checks for non-atomic file operation. And then replace it with a nearly equivalent and atomic method.

These can cause problems that are difficult to reproduce, especially in cases of frequent file operations in parallel, such as test runs with parallel_rspec.

For examples: creating a directory if there is none, has the following problems

An exception occurs when the directory didn't exist at the time of exist?, but someone else created it before mkdir was executed.

Subsequent processes are executed without the directory that should be there when the directory existed at the time of exist?, but someone else deleted it shortly afterwards.

Safety:

This cop is unsafe, because autocorrection change to atomic processing. The atomic processing of the replacement destination is not guaranteed to be strictly equivalent to that before the replacement.

Example:

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `mkdir`
unless Dir.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.mkdir(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent creation
FileUtils.mkdir_p(path)

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `remove`
if File.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.remove(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent removal
FileUtils.rm_f(path)

Remove unnecessary existence check File.exist?.
Open

      FileUtils.rm_f(root_filename) if File.exist?(root_filename)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb by rubocop

Checks for non-atomic file operation. And then replace it with a nearly equivalent and atomic method.

These can cause problems that are difficult to reproduce, especially in cases of frequent file operations in parallel, such as test runs with parallel_rspec.

For examples: creating a directory if there is none, has the following problems

An exception occurs when the directory didn't exist at the time of exist?, but someone else created it before mkdir was executed.

Subsequent processes are executed without the directory that should be there when the directory existed at the time of exist?, but someone else deleted it shortly afterwards.

Safety:

This cop is unsafe, because autocorrection change to atomic processing. The atomic processing of the replacement destination is not guaranteed to be strictly equivalent to that before the replacement.

Example:

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `mkdir`
unless Dir.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.mkdir(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent creation
FileUtils.mkdir_p(path)

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `remove`
if File.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.remove(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent removal
FileUtils.rm_f(path)

Remove unnecessary existence check File.exist?.
Open

      FileUtils.rm_f(key_filename)  if File.exist?(key_filename)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/appliance_console/certificate.rb by rubocop

Checks for non-atomic file operation. And then replace it with a nearly equivalent and atomic method.

These can cause problems that are difficult to reproduce, especially in cases of frequent file operations in parallel, such as test runs with parallel_rspec.

For examples: creating a directory if there is none, has the following problems

An exception occurs when the directory didn't exist at the time of exist?, but someone else created it before mkdir was executed.

Subsequent processes are executed without the directory that should be there when the directory existed at the time of exist?, but someone else deleted it shortly afterwards.

Safety:

This cop is unsafe, because autocorrection change to atomic processing. The atomic processing of the replacement destination is not guaranteed to be strictly equivalent to that before the replacement.

Example:

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `mkdir`
unless Dir.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.mkdir(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent creation
FileUtils.mkdir_p(path)

# bad - race condition with another process may result in an error in `remove`
if File.exist?(path)
  FileUtils.remove(path)
end

# good - atomic and idempotent removal
FileUtils.rm_f(path)

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status