File miq_rexml.rb
has 273 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'time'
require 'rexml/document'
require_relative 'xml_utils'
class MIQRexml
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(first, second = nil, parent = nil)
@normalized = @unnormalized = @element = nil
if first.kind_of? Attribute
self.name = first.expanded_name
@value = first.value
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method findRegElementInt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.findRegElementInt(paths, ele)
if paths.length > 0
searchStr = paths[0].downcase
paths = paths[1..paths.length]
# puts "Search String: #{searchStr}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(first, second = nil, parent = nil)
@normalized = @unnormalized = @element = nil
if first.kind_of? Attribute
self.name = first.expanded_name
@value = first.value
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method load
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.load(data)
REXML::Document.new(data)
rescue => err
if err.class == ::Encoding::CompatibilityError
data_utf8 = data.dup.force_encoding('UTF-8')
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(output = $stdout, indent = -1, transitive = false, ie_hack = false)
return write_orig(output, indent, transitive, ie_hack) unless defined?(REXML::Formatters)
formatter = if indent > -1
if transitive
REXML::Formatters::Transitive.new(indent, ie_hack)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getChildAttrib
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.getChildAttrib(ele, attrib, default)
type = nil
ele.each_element do |e|
type = e.text if e.attributes['name'] == attrib
break if type
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method findElementInt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.findElementInt(paths, ele)
if paths.length > 0
searchStr = paths[0]
paths = paths[1..paths.length]
# puts "Search String: #{searchStr}"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many optional parameters. [4/3] Open
def write(output = $stdout, indent = -1, transitive = false, ie_hack = false)
return write_orig(output, indent, transitive, ie_hack) unless defined?(REXML::Formatters)
formatter = if indent > -1
if transitive
REXML::Formatters::Transitive.new(indent, ie_hack)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for methods with too many parameters.
The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.
Any number of arguments for initialize
method inside a block of
Struct.new
and Data.define
like this is always allowed:
Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
end
end
This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize
method
does not make sense.
NOTE: Explicit block argument &block
is not counted to prevent
erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.
Example: Max: 3
# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end
Example: Max: 2
# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end
Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)
# counts keyword args towards the maximum
# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end
# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end
Example: CountKeywordArgs: false
# don't count keyword args towards the maximum
# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end
This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters.
This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters
config option.
Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)
# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end
Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2
# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
$log.error "Encoding error: #{second_utf8}" if $log
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if xml.root
xml.root.add_attributes(
"version" => version,
"created_on" => Time.now.to_i,
"display_time" => Time.now.getutc.iso8601,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 25.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Useless private
access modifier. Open
private
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for redundant access modifiers, including those with no
code, those which are repeated, and leading public
modifiers in a
class or module body. Conditionally-defined methods are considered as
always being defined, and thus access modifiers guarding such methods
are not redundant.
This cop has ContextCreatingMethods
option. The default setting value
is an empty array that means no method is specified.
This setting is an array of methods which, when called, are known to
create its own context in the module's current access context.
It also has MethodCreatingMethods
option. The default setting value
is an empty array that means no method is specified.
This setting is an array of methods which, when called, are known to
create other methods in the module's current access context.
Example:
# bad
class Foo
public # this is redundant (default access is public)
def method
end
end
# bad
class Foo
# The following is redundant (methods defined on the class'
# singleton class are not affected by the private modifier)
private
def self.method3
end
end
# bad
class Foo
protected
define_method(:method2) do
end
protected # this is redundant (repeated from previous modifier)
[1,2,3].each do |i|
define_method("foo#{i}") do
end
end
end
# bad
class Foo
private # this is redundant (no following methods are defined)
end
# good
class Foo
private # this is not redundant (a method is defined)
def method2
end
end
# good
class Foo
# The following is not redundant (conditionally defined methods are
# considered as always defining a method)
private
if condition?
def method
end
end
end
# good
class Foo
protected # this is not redundant (a method is defined)
define_method(:method2) do
end
end
Example: ContextCreatingMethods: concerning
# Lint/UselessAccessModifier:
# ContextCreatingMethods:
# - concerning
# good
require 'active_support/concern'
class Foo
concerning :Bar do
def some_public_method
end
private
def some_private_method
end
end
# this is not redundant because `concerning` created its own context
private
def some_other_private_method
end
end
Example: MethodCreatingMethods: delegate
# Lint/UselessAccessModifier:
# MethodCreatingMethods:
# - delegate
# good
require 'active_support/core_ext/module/delegation'
class Foo
# this is not redundant because `delegate` creates methods
private
delegate :method_a, to: :method_b
end
private
(on line 63) does not make singleton methods private. Use private_class_method
or private
inside a class << self
block instead. Open
def self.findElementInt(paths, ele)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for private
or protected
access modifiers which are
applied to a singleton method. These access modifiers do not make
singleton methods private/protected. private_class_method
can be
used for that.
Example:
# bad
class C
private
def self.method
puts 'hi'
end
end
Example:
# good
class C
def self.method
puts 'hi'
end
private_class_method :method
end
Example:
# good
class C
class << self
private
def method
puts 'hi'
end
end
end
private
(on line 63) does not make singleton methods private. Use private_class_method
or private
inside a class << self
block instead. Open
def self.findRegElementInt(paths, ele)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks for private
or protected
access modifiers which are
applied to a singleton method. These access modifiers do not make
singleton methods private/protected. private_class_method
can be
used for that.
Example:
# bad
class C
private
def self.method
puts 'hi'
end
end
Example:
# good
class C
def self.method
puts 'hi'
end
private_class_method :method
end
Example:
# good
class C
class << self
private
def method
puts 'hi'
end
end
end