ManageIQ/manageiq-messaging

View on GitHub

Showing 21 of 21 total issues

Method subscribe_background_job_impl has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def subscribe_background_job_impl(options)
          queue_name, headers = queue_for_subscribe(options)

          subscribe(queue_name, headers) do |msg|
            begin
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/background_job.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method subscribe_background_job_impl has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def subscribe_background_job_impl(options)
          queue_name, headers = queue_for_subscribe(options)

          subscribe(queue_name, headers) do |msg|
            begin
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/background_job.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Method subscribe_messages_impl has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def subscribe_messages_impl(options)
          queue_name, headers = queue_for_subscribe(options)

          # for STOMP we can get message one at a time
          subscribe(queue_name, headers) do |msg|
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/queue.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method rdkafka_connection_opts has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def rdkafka_connection_opts(options)
          hosts = Array(options[:hosts] || options[:host])
          hosts.collect! { |host| "#{host}:#{options[:port]}" }

          result = {:"bootstrap.servers" => hosts.join(',')}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/kafka/client.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def initialize(sender, message, payload, headers, ack_ref, client)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/received_message.rb - About 45 mins to fix

Method publish_message_impl has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def publish_message_impl(options, &block)
          address, headers = queue_for_publish(options)
          headers[:sender]         = options[:sender] if options[:sender]
          headers[:message_type]   = options[:message] if options[:message]
          headers[:class_name]     = options[:class_name] if options[:class_name]
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/queue.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method decode_body has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def decode_body(headers, raw_body)
        return raw_body unless headers.kind_of?(Hash)
        case headers["encoding"] || headers[:encoding]
        when "json"
          JSON.parse(raw_body)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/common.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def initialize(options)
          host = options.slice(:host, :port, :ssl)
          host[:passcode] = options[:password] if options[:password]
          host[:login] = options[:username] if options[:username]

Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/client.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method queue_for_publish has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def queue_for_publish(options)
          affinity = options[:affinity] || 'none'
          address = "queue/#{options[:service]}.#{affinity}"

          headers = {:"destination-type" => 'ANYCAST', :persistent => true}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/stomp/common.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid parameter lists longer than 5 parameters. [6/5]
Open

      def initialize(sender, message, payload, headers, ack_ref, client)

Checks for methods with too many parameters.

The maximum number of parameters is configurable. Keyword arguments can optionally be excluded from the total count, as they add less complexity than positional or optional parameters.

Any number of arguments for initialize method inside a block of Struct.new and Data.define like this is always allowed:

Struct.new(:one, :two, :three, :four, :five, keyword_init: true) do
  def initialize(one:, two:, three:, four:, five:)
  end
end

This is because checking the number of arguments of the initialize method does not make sense.

NOTE: Explicit block argument &block is not counted to prevent erroneous change that is avoided by making block argument implicit.

Example: Max: 3

# good
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: Max: 2

# bad
def foo(a, b, c = 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: true (default)

# counts keyword args towards the maximum

# bad (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c: 1)
end

Example: CountKeywordArgs: false

# don't count keyword args towards the maximum

# good (assuming Max is 3)
def foo(a, b, c, d: 1)
end

This cop also checks for the maximum number of optional parameters. This can be configured using the MaxOptionalParameters config option.

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 3 (default)

# good
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Example: MaxOptionalParameters: 2

# bad
def foo(a = 1, b = 2, c = 3)
end

Ambiguous splat operator. Parenthesize the method arguments if it's surely a splat operator, or add a whitespace to the right of the * if it should be a multiplication.
Open

        private *delegate(:subscribe, :unsubscribe, :publish, :to => :stomp_client)

Checks for ambiguous operators in the first argument of a method invocation without parentheses.

Example:

# bad

# The `*` is interpreted as a splat operator but it could possibly be
# a `*` method invocation (i.e. `do_something.*(some_array)`).
do_something *some_array

Example:

# good

# With parentheses, there's no ambiguity.
do_something(*some_array)

Call super to initialize state of the parent class.
Open

        def initialize(options)
          @encoding = options[:encoding] || 'yaml'
          require "json" if @encoding == "json"

          ::Rdkafka::Config.logger = logger

Checks for the presence of constructors and lifecycle callbacks without calls to super.

This cop does not consider method_missing (and respond_to_missing?) because in some cases it makes sense to overtake what is considered a missing method. In other cases, the theoretical ideal handling could be challenging or verbose for no actual gain.

Autocorrection is not supported because the position of super cannot be determined automatically.

Object and BasicObject are allowed by this cop because of their stateless nature. However, sometimes you might want to allow other parent classes from this cop, for example in the case of an abstract class that is not meant to be called with super. In those cases, you can use the AllowedParentClasses option to specify which classes should be allowed in addition to Object and BasicObject.

Example:

# bad
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    super
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class ClassWithNoParent
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Example: AllowedParentClasses: [MyAbstractClass]

# good
class MyConcreteClass < MyAbstractClass
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Check block argument explicitly instead of using block_given?.
Open

        raise "A block is required" unless block_given?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/client.rb by rubocop

Check block argument explicitly instead of using block_given?.
Open

        raise "A block is required" unless block_given?
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/manageiq/messaging/client.rb by rubocop

Check block argument explicitly instead of using block_given?.
Open

          return unless block_given?

Use String#include? instead of a regex match with literal-only pattern.
Open

          raise unless e.message =~ /no_offset/

metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] must be set to 'true'.
Open

Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.name                  = "manageiq-messaging"
  spec.version               = ManageIQ::Messaging::VERSION
  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 3.0'
  spec.authors               = ["ManageIQ Authors"]
Severity: Minor
Found in manageiq-messaging.gemspec by rubocop

Requires a gemspec to have rubygems_mfa_required metadata set.

This setting tells RubyGems that MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) is required for accounts to be able perform privileged operations, such as (see RubyGems' documentation for the full list of privileged operations):

  • gem push
  • gem yank
  • gem owner --add/remove
  • adding or removing owners using gem ownership page

This helps make your gem more secure, as users can be more confident that gem updates were pushed by maintainers.

Example:

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  # no `rubygems_mfa_required` metadata specified
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'true'
  }
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'true'
end

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'false'
  }
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'true'
  }
end

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'false'
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'true'
end

Call super to initialize state of the parent class.
Open

        def initialize(options)
          host = options.slice(:host, :port, :ssl)
          host[:passcode] = options[:password] if options[:password]
          host[:login] = options[:username] if options[:username]

Checks for the presence of constructors and lifecycle callbacks without calls to super.

This cop does not consider method_missing (and respond_to_missing?) because in some cases it makes sense to overtake what is considered a missing method. In other cases, the theoretical ideal handling could be challenging or verbose for no actual gain.

Autocorrection is not supported because the position of super cannot be determined automatically.

Object and BasicObject are allowed by this cop because of their stateless nature. However, sometimes you might want to allow other parent classes from this cop, for example in the case of an abstract class that is not meant to be called with super. In those cases, you can use the AllowedParentClasses option to specify which classes should be allowed in addition to Object and BasicObject.

Example:

# bad
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    super
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class ClassWithNoParent
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Example: AllowedParentClasses: [MyAbstractClass]

# good
class MyConcreteClass < MyAbstractClass
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Call super to initialize state of the parent class.
Open

      def initialize(*_args); end

Checks for the presence of constructors and lifecycle callbacks without calls to super.

This cop does not consider method_missing (and respond_to_missing?) because in some cases it makes sense to overtake what is considered a missing method. In other cases, the theoretical ideal handling could be challenging or verbose for no actual gain.

Autocorrection is not supported because the position of super cannot be determined automatically.

Object and BasicObject are allowed by this cop because of their stateless nature. However, sometimes you might want to allow other parent classes from this cop, for example in the case of an abstract class that is not meant to be called with super. In those cases, you can use the AllowedParentClasses option to specify which classes should be allowed in addition to Object and BasicObject.

Example:

# bad
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
class Employee < Person
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# good
Employee = Class.new(Person) do
  def initialize(name, salary)
    super(name)
    @salary = salary
  end
end

# bad
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class Parent
  def self.inherited(base)
    super
    do_something
  end
end

# good
class ClassWithNoParent
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Example: AllowedParentClasses: [MyAbstractClass]

# good
class MyConcreteClass < MyAbstractClass
  def initialize
    do_something
  end
end

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

          raise unless e.message =~ /no_offset/

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language