ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-ansible_tower

View on GitHub

Showing 16 of 16 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def raw_artifacts
    require 'ansible_tower_client'
    ext_management_system.with_provider_connection do |connection|
      connection.api.jobs.find(ems_ref).artifacts
    end
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/job.rb on lines 13..24

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 57.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def refresh_ems
    require 'ansible_tower_client'
    ext_management_system.with_provider_connection do |connection|
      update_with_provider_object(connection.api.jobs.find(ems_ref))
    end
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/job.rb on lines 53..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 57.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method infer_related_manager_refs! has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def infer_related_manager_refs!
    if references(:configured_systems).present?
      hosts.each do |host|
        add_simple_target!(:inventory_root_groups, host.inventory_id.to_s)
      end

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_child_job(raw_job)
    job = jobs.find_by(:ems_ref => raw_job.id)
    unless job
      job_template = ext_management_system.configuration_scripts.find_by(:manager_ref => raw_job.job_template_id)
      job = ManageIQ::Providers::AnsibleTower::AutomationManager::Job.create(
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/workflow_job.rb on lines 59..71

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 43.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def update_child_workflow_job(raw_workflow_job)
    job = jobs.find_by(:ems_ref => raw_workflow_job.id)
    unless job
      workflow_template = ext_management_system.configuration_scripts.find_by(:manager_ref => raw_workflow_job.workflow_job_template_id)
      job = ManageIQ::Providers::AnsibleTower::AutomationManager::WorkflowJob.create(
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/workflow_job.rb on lines 43..55

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 43.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def run_with_miq_job(options, userid = nil)
    options[:name] = "Job Template: #{name}"
    options[:ansible_template_id] = id
    options[:userid] = userid || 'system'
    miq_job = ManageIQ::Providers::AnsibleTower::AutomationManager::TemplateRunner.create_job(options)
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/configuration_workflow.rb on lines 4..10

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def run_with_miq_job(options, userid = nil)
    options[:name] = "Workflow Template: #{name}"
    options[:ansible_template_id] = id
    options[:userid] = userid || 'system'
    miq_job = ManageIQ::Providers::AnsibleTower::AutomationManager::TemplateRunner.create_job(options)
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/configuration_script.rb on lines 8..14

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 34.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = {
    :userid => {
      :label      => N_('Username'),
      :help_text  => N_('The username to use to connect to Satellite 6'),
      :required   => true
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..12
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = {
    :userid => {
      :label     => N_('Username'),
      :help_text => N_('Username for this credential'),
      :required  => true
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..12
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/satellite6_credential.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = {
    :userid   => {
      :label     => N_('Access Key'),
      :help_text => N_('AWS Access Key for this credential'),
      :required  => true
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/satellite6_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = {
    :userid => {
      :label     => N_('Username'),
      :help_text => N_('Username for this credential'),
      :required  => true
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..12
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/openstack_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/satellite6_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  COMMON_ATTRIBUTES = {
    :userid => {
      :label     => N_('Username'),
      :help_text => N_('The username to use to connect to OpenStack'),
      :required  => true
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/amazon_credential.rb on lines 2..12
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/network_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/satellite6_credential.rb on lines 6..16
app/models/manageiq/providers/ansible_tower/automation_manager/vmware_credential.rb on lines 6..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Do not suppress exceptions.
Open

rescue LoadError
Severity: Minor
Found in Rakefile by rubocop

Checks for rescue blocks with no body.

Example:

# bad
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
end

# bad
begin
  do_something
rescue
end

# good
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
  handle_exception
end

# good
begin
  do_something
rescue
  handle_exception
end

Example: AllowComments: true (default)

# good
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
  # do nothing
end

# good
begin
  do_something
rescue
  # do nothing
end

Example: AllowComments: false

# bad
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
  # do nothing
end

# bad
begin
  do_something
rescue
  # do nothing
end

Example: AllowNil: true (default)

# good
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
  nil
end

# good
begin
  do_something
rescue
  # do nothing
end

# good
do_something rescue nil

Example: AllowNil: false

# bad
def some_method
  do_something
rescue
  nil
end

# bad
begin
  do_something
rescue
  nil
end

# bad
do_something rescue nil

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

    url = "https://#{url}" unless url =~ %r{\Ahttps?:\/\/} # HACK: URI can't properly parse a URL with no scheme

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] must be set to 'true'.
Open

Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.name          = "manageiq-providers-ansible_tower"
  spec.version       = ManageIQ::Providers::AnsibleTower::VERSION
  spec.authors       = ["ManageIQ Authors"]

Requires a gemspec to have rubygems_mfa_required metadata set.

This setting tells RubyGems that MFA (Multi-Factor Authentication) is required for accounts to be able perform privileged operations, such as (see RubyGems' documentation for the full list of privileged operations):

  • gem push
  • gem yank
  • gem owner --add/remove
  • adding or removing owners using gem ownership page

This helps make your gem more secure, as users can be more confident that gem updates were pushed by maintainers.

Example:

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  # no `rubygems_mfa_required` metadata specified
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'true'
  }
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'true'
end

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'false'
  }
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata = {
    'rubygems_mfa_required' => 'true'
  }
end

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'false'
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.metadata['rubygems_mfa_required'] = 'true'
end

Avoid immutable Array literals in loops. It is better to extract it into a local variable or a constant.
Open

        %w(credential_id cloud_credential_id network_credential_id).each do |credential_attr|
Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language