ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-azure

View on GitHub
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector/target_collection.rb

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage
B
87%

Cyclomatic complexity for infer_related_vm_ems_refs_db! is too high. [14/11]
Open

  def infer_related_vm_ems_refs_db!
    changed_vms = manager.vms
                         .where(:ems_ref => references(:vms))
                         .includes(:key_pairs, :network_ports, :floating_ips, :orchestration_stack, :resource_group, :cloud_subnets => [:cloud_network])

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Method infer_related_stacks_ems_refs_api! has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def infer_related_stacks_ems_refs_api!
    # Get resource groups out of Stack references, we need them to fetch stacks
    references(:orchestration_stacks).each do |stack_ems_ref|
      resource_group_ems_ref = stack_ems_ref.split("/")[0..4].join("/")
      add_target!(:resource_groups, resource_group_ems_ref.downcase)

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      refs.map { |x| targeted_stacks_cache[x] }.compact

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      vm.floating_ips.collect(&:ems_ref).compact.each { |ems_ref| add_target!(:floating_ips, ems_ref) }

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      vm.key_pairs.collect(&:name).compact.each do |name|

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      network_port.floating_ips.collect(&:ems_ref).compact.each { |ems_ref| add_target!(:floating_ips, ems_ref) }

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      vm.cloud_networks.collect(&:ems_ref).compact.each { |ems_ref| add_target!(:cloud_networks, ems_ref) }

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      vm.network_ports.collect(&:ems_ref).compact.each do |ems_ref|

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      network_port.cloud_subnets.collect { |x| x.cloud_network.try(:ems_ref) }.compact.each { |ems_ref| add_target!(:cloud_networks, ems_ref) }

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      all_stacks.collect(&:ems_ref).compact.each { |ems_ref| add_target!(:orchestration_stacks, ems_ref) }

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def floating_ips
    refs = references(:floating_ips)
    return [] if refs.blank?

    @floating_ips_cache ||= if refs.size > record_limit
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector/target_collection.rb on lines 355..374

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def load_balancers
    refs = references(:load_balancers)
    return [] if refs.blank?

    @load_balancers_cache ||= if refs.size > record_limit
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector/target_collection.rb on lines 376..395

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 72.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def security_groups
    refs = references(:security_groups)
    return [] if refs.blank?

    if refs.size > record_limit
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector/target_collection.rb on lines 291..310

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 66.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def cloud_networks
    refs = references(:cloud_networks)
    return [] if refs.blank?

    if refs.size > record_limit
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector/target_collection.rb on lines 312..331

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 66.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      if urns
        urns.collect do |urn|
          publisher, offer, sku, version = urn.split(':')

          ::Azure::Armrest::VirtualMachineImage.new(
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/collector.rb on lines 279..293

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 38.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def resource_id_for_instance_id(id)
    # TODO(lsmola) we really need to get rid of the building our own emf_ref, it makes crosslinking impossible, parsing
    # the id string like this is suboptimal
    return nil unless id
    _, _, guid, _, resource_group, _, type, sub_type, name = id.split("/")
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/cloud_manager/event_target_parser.rb on lines 113..116
app/models/manageiq/providers/azure/inventory/parser/network_manager.rb on lines 364..369

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 31.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status