Cyclomatic complexity for tag_edit_build_screen is too high. [22/11] Open
def tag_edit_build_screen
@showlinks = true
@edit[:object_ids] ||= @object_ids
cats = Classification.categories.select(&:show).sort_by { |t| t.description.try(:downcase) } # Get the categories, sort by description
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Cyclomatic complexity for tagging_edit is too high. [14/11] Open
def tagging_edit(db = nil, assert = true)
if nested_page?
assert_privileges("#{controller_for_common_methods}_tag")
else
assert_privileges("#{@display && @display != "main" ? @display.singularize : controller_for_common_methods}_tag") if assert
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Method tag_edit_build_screen
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag_edit_build_screen
@showlinks = true
@edit[:object_ids] ||= @object_ids
cats = Classification.categories.select(&:show).sort_by { |t| t.description.try(:downcase) } # Get the categories, sort by description
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method tagging_edit_tags_reset
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagging_edit_tags_reset
get_tag_items if @explorer
@object_ids = session[:tag_items]
@sb[:rec_id] = params[:id] || session[:tag_items][0]
@tagging = session[:tag_db].to_s
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tagging_edit
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tagging_edit(db = nil, assert = true)
if nested_page?
assert_privileges("#{controller_for_common_methods}_tag")
else
assert_privileges("#{@display && @display != "main" ? @display.singularize : controller_for_common_methods}_tag") if assert
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tag_edit_build_screen
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag_edit_build_screen
@showlinks = true
@edit[:object_ids] ||= @object_ids
cats = Classification.categories.select(&:show).sort_by { |t| t.description.try(:downcase) } # Get the categories, sort by description
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method nested_page?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nested_page?
(@display == "repositories" && params[:controller] == "ansible_credential") ||
(@display == "playbooks" && params[:controller] == "ansible_repository") ||
(@display == "repositories" && params[:controller] == "workflow_credential") ||
(@display == "workflows" && params[:controller] == "workflow_repository")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Wrap expressions with varying precedence with parentheses to avoid ambiguity. Open
:record_id => @sb[:rec_id] || @edit[:object_ids] && @edit[:object_ids][0]}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
- Exclude checks
Looks for expressions containing multiple binary operators
where precedence is ambiguous due to lack of parentheses. For example,
in 1 + 2 * 3
, the multiplication will happen before the addition, but
lexically it appears that the addition will happen first.
The cop does not consider unary operators (ie. !a
or -b
) or comparison
operators (ie. a =~ b
) because those are not ambiguous.
NOTE: Ranges are handled by Lint/AmbiguousRange
.
Example:
# bad
a + b * c
a || b && c
a ** b + c
# good (different precedence)
a + (b * c)
a || (b && c)
(a ** b) + c
# good (same precedence)
a + b + c
a * b / c % d