Sign upLogin

ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
Star
app/models/classification.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
4 hrs
Test Coverage
C
75%

Cyclomatic complexity for bulk_reassignment is too high. [16/11]
Open

  def self.bulk_reassignment(options = {})
    # options = {
    #   :model      => Target class name
    #   :object_ids => Array of target ids
    #   :add_ids    => Array of entry ids to be assigned to targets
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Method bulk_reassignment has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.bulk_reassignment(options = {})
    # options = {
    #   :model      => Target class name
    #   :object_ids => Array of target ids
    #   :add_ids    => Array of entry ids to be assigned to targets
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use filter_map instead.
Open

      .collect { |c| c.name if c.tag2ns(c.tag.name) == ns }
      .compact
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb by rubocop

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      adds.each do |a|
        _log.info("Adding entry name: [#{a.name}] to #{options[:model]} name: #{t.name}")

        begin
          a.assign_entry_to(t)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 161..170

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      deletes.each do |d|
        _log.info("Removing entry name: [#{d.name}] from #{options[:model]} name: #{t.name}")

        begin
          d.remove_entry_from(t)
Severity: Major
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 173..182

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 58.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.unclassify_by_tag(obj, tag, is_request = true)
    parts = tag.split("/")
    raise _("Tag %{tag} is not a category entry") % {:tag => tag} unless parts[1] == "managed"

    entry_name = parts.pop
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 120..127

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.classify_by_tag(obj, tag, is_request = true)
    parts = tag.split("/")
    raise _("Tag %{tag} is not a category entry") % {:tag => tag} unless parts[1] == "managed"

    entry_name = parts.pop
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 130..137

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 33.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      failed_deletes.each do |target, deletes|
        names = deletes.collect(&:name).sort
        msg += _("  Unable to remove the following tags from %{class_name} %{id}: %{names}.") %
               {:class_name => target.class.name, :id => target.id, :names => names.join(", ")}
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 193..197

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      failed_adds.each do |target, adds|
        names = adds.collect(&:name).sort
        msg += _("  Unable to add the following tags to %{class_name} %{id}: %{names}.") %
               {:class_name => target.class.name, :id => target.id, :names => names.join(", ")}
      end
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
app/models/classification.rb on lines 188..192

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 29.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Prefer using YAML.safe_load over YAML.load.
Open

    input = YAML.load(fd)
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb by rubocop

Checks for the use of YAML class methods which have potential security issues leading to remote code execution when loading from an untrusted source.

NOTE: Ruby 3.1+ (Psych 4) uses Psych.load as Psych.safe_load by default.

Safety:

The behavior of the code might change depending on what was in the YAML payload, since YAML.safe_load is more restrictive.

Example:

# bad
YAML.load("--- !ruby/object:Foo {}") # Psych 3 is unsafe by default

# good
YAML.safe_load("--- !ruby/object:Foo {}", [Foo])                    # Ruby 2.5  (Psych 3)
YAML.safe_load("--- !ruby/object:Foo {}", permitted_classes: [Foo]) # Ruby 3.0- (Psych 3)
YAML.load("--- !ruby/object:Foo {}", permitted_classes: [Foo])      # Ruby 3.1+ (Psych 4)
YAML.dump(foo)

Avoid rescuing the Exception class. Perhaps you meant to rescue StandardError?
Open

    rescue Exception => err
      _log.log_backtrace(err)
      raise
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/classification.rb by rubocop

Checks for rescue blocks targeting the Exception class.

Example:

# bad

begin
  do_something
rescue Exception
  handle_exception
end

Example:

# good

begin
  do_something
rescue ArgumentError
  handle_exception
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status