ManageIQ/manageiq

View on GitHub
app/models/vim_performance_trend.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
3 hrs
Test Coverage
C
77%

Method build has a Cognitive Complexity of 32 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def self.build(perfs, options)
    # options = {
    #   :trend_col      => "max_cpu_usagemhz_rate_average",
    #   :limit_col      => "max_derived_cpu_available",
    #   :limit_val      => 4096,
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_trend.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Cyclomatic complexity for build is too high. [25/11]
Open

  def self.build(perfs, options)
    # options = {
    #   :trend_col      => "max_cpu_usagemhz_rate_average",
    #   :limit_col      => "max_derived_cpu_available",
    #   :limit_val      => 4096,
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_trend.rb by rubocop

Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.

def each_child_node(*types)               # count begins: 1
  unless block_given?                     # unless: +1
    return to_enum(__method__, *types)

  children.each do |child|                # each{}: +1
    next unless child.is_a?(Node)         # unless: +1

    yield child if types.empty? ||        # if: +1, ||: +1
                   types.include?(child.type)
  end

  self
end                                       # total: 6

Use filter_map instead.
Open

    coordinates = recs.collect do |r|
      next unless r.respond_to?(CHART_X_AXIS_COL) && r.respond_to?(col)

      [r.send(CHART_X_AXIS_COL).to_i, r.send(col).to_f]
    end.compact
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_trend.rb by rubocop

Shadowing outer local variable - col.
Open

    TREND_COLS[db.to_sym][col.to_sym][:limit_cols].each_with_object([]) do |col, arr|
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vim_performance_trend.rb by rubocop

Checks for the use of local variable names from an outer scope in block arguments or block-local variables. This mirrors the warning given by ruby -cw prior to Ruby 2.6: "shadowing outer local variable - foo".

NOTE: Shadowing of variables in block passed to Ractor.new is allowed because Ractor should not access outer variables. eg. following style is encouraged:

```ruby
worker_id, pipe = env
Ractor.new(worker_id, pipe) do |worker_id, pipe|
end
```

Example:

# bad

def some_method
  foo = 1

  2.times do |foo| # shadowing outer `foo`
    do_something(foo)
  end
end

Example:

# good

def some_method
  foo = 1

  2.times do |bar|
    do_something(bar)
  end
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status