Showing 286 of 1,311 total issues
Method refresh_internal
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def refresh_internal(ems_id_or_object_ids, ems_ref, queue:)
targets =
if ems_ref.nil?
Array(ems_id_or_object_ids).map { |id| [base_class, id] }
else
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method refresh_ipmi
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def refresh_ipmi
if ipmi_config_valid?
require 'miq-ipmi'
address = ipmi_address
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recrypt
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recrypt(old_value, options = {})
hash = old_value.kind_of?(Hash) ? old_value : YAML.load(old_value)
Vmdb::SettingsWalker.walk(hash) do |key, value, _path, owning|
owning[key] = super(value, options) if password_field?(key) && value.present?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fields(expression = exp)
case expression
when Array
expression.flat_map { |x| fields(x) }
when Hash
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method allowed_templates
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def allowed_templates(options = {})
# Return pre-selected VM if we are called for cloning
if [:clone_to_vm, :clone_to_template].include?(request_type)
vm_or_template = VmOrTemplate.find_by(:id => get_value(@values[:src_vm_id]))
return [create_hash_struct_from_vm_or_template(vm_or_template, options)].compact
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _subst_find
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._subst_find(rec, expr)
MiqPolicy.logger.debug("MIQ(condition-_subst_find): Find Expression before substitution: [#{expr}]")
searchexp = /<search>(.+)<\/search>/im
expr =~ searchexp
search = $1
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_dot
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_dot(include_starred_states = false)
all_states = transitions.values.map(&:to_a).flatten.uniq.reject { |t| t == "*" }
"".tap do |s|
s << "digraph #{self.class.name.inspect} {\n"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recursive_delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def recursive_delete(scope, klass = scope.klass, name: klass.name)
_log.debug { "=> deep_delete #{name} begin" }
# TODO: fetch distinct.pluck(:type).map(&:constantize).map { |k| refs_callbacks(k)} - to handle STI?
# current code does not require this but may be more future proof
refs, callbacks = refs_callbacks(scope.klass)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _search
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _search(opts, seen = nil, &_blk)
raw_opts = opts.dup
opts[:scope] = scope(opts[:scope]) if opts[:scope]
if opts[:filter]
opts[:filter] = filter_construct(opts[:filter]) unless opts[:filter].kind_of?(Net::LDAP::Filter)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _subst
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._subst(rec, opts, tag, mode)
ohash, ref = options2hash(opts, rec)
case mode.downcase
when "exist"
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method child_tags_over_time_period
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.child_tags_over_time_period(obj, interval_name, options = {})
classifications = Classification.hash_all_by_type_and_name
find_child_perf_for_time_period(obj, interval_name, options.merge(:conditions => "resource_type != 'VmOrTemplate' AND tag_names IS NOT NULL", :select => "resource_type, tag_names")).each_with_object({}) do |p, h|
p.tag_names.split("|").each do |t|
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method columns_for_distinct
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def columns_for_distinct(columns, orders) # :nodoc:
order_columns = orders.reject(&:blank?).map do |s|
# Convert Arel node to string
unless s.is_a?(String)
if s.kind_of?(Arel::Nodes::Ordering)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method scope_targets
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def scope_targets(klass, scope, rbac_filters, user, miq_group)
# Results are scoped by tenant if the TenancyMixin is included in the class,
# with a few manual exceptions (User, Tenant). Note that the classes in
# TENANT_ACCESS_STRATEGY are a consolidated list of them.
if klass.respond_to?(:scope_by_tenant?) && klass.scope_by_tenant?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method _to_human
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self._to_human(exp, options = {})
return exp unless exp.kind_of?(Hash) || exp.kind_of?(Array)
keys = exp.keys
keys.delete(:token)
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sync_windows_images
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_windows_images
return if windows_images_directory.nil?
_log.info("Synchronizing Windows images on PXE Server [#{name}]...")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sync_workers
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_workers
ws = find_current_or_starting
current = ws.collect(&:queue_name).sort
desired = has_required_role? ? desired_queue_names.sort : []
result = {:adds => [], :deletes => []}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_completed_event
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.create_completed_event(event, orig_task = nil)
if orig_task.nil?
orig_task = first_chained_event(event[:ems_id], event[:chain_id])
return if orig_task.nil?
end
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method monitor_servers_as_master
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def monitor_servers_as_master
_log.debug("Checking other servers as master server")
@last_master = nil
@last_servers ||= {}
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method calculate_section
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def calculate_section(base, result, section, sub_sections, columns)
section = section[:name]
count = total = count_exists = total_exists = 0
if sub_sections.nil?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method to_chart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 11 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def to_chart(theme = nil, show_title = false, graph_options = nil)
ManageIQ::Reporting::Formatter::ReportRenderer.render(ManageIQ::Reporting::Charting.format) do |e|
if col_formats
# NOTE: This code intentionally does not use number_to_human_size to create a human-readable
# chart summary, because we want to match the unit of the column, regardless of the size.
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"