Class GitMirror has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class GitMirror
def initialize
require "colorize"
require "config"
require "fileutils"Method sync_branch has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def sync_branch(source_remote, source_name, dest_remote, dest_name)
return unless dest_remote && dest_name
source_fq_name = "#{source_remote}/#{source_name}"
dest_fq_name = "#{dest_remote}/#{dest_name}"- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method clone_repo has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def clone_repo(upstream_repo, downstream_repo, path, remote_source)
upstream_remote = settings.git_mirror.remotes[remote_source]
raise "remote '#{remote_source}'' not found in settings" if upstream_remote.nil?
system("git clone #{upstream_remote}/#{upstream_repo}.git #{path} -o upstream")- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method system has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def system(*args)
puts "+ #{"dry_run: " if dry_run?}#{args.join(" ")}"
return true if dry_run?
args << {} unless args.last.is_a?(Hash)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method with_repo has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def with_repo(repo, options)
repo_name = downstream_repo_name(repo, options)
puts "\n==== Mirroring #{repo_name} ====".bold.cyan
working_dir = settings.git_mirror.working_directory- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method remote_refs has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def remote_refs(repo, remote)
return unless remote_exists?(remote)
`git ls-remote #{remote} | grep "heads"`.split("\n").collect do |line|
branch = line.split("/").last- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Use filter_map instead. Open
`git ls-remote #{remote} | grep "heads"`.split("\n").collect do |line|
branch = line.split("/").last
next if remote == "upstream" && !upstream_branch?(repo, branch)
"#{remote}/#{branch}:refs/heads/#{branch}"
end.compact.join(" ")- Exclude checks