Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function equalities. (31) Open
@simplifier
def equalities(expr):
""" equalities """
# a == b || a > b becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function negate. (28) Open
@simplifier
def negate(expr):
""" transform negations into simpler, more readable forms
!(a && b) becomes !a || !b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function flags. (19) Open
@simplifier
def flags(expr):
""" transform flags operations into simpler expressions such as lower-than
or greater-than.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function add_sub. (18) Open
@simplifier
def add_sub(expr):
""" Simplify nested math expressions when the second operand of
each expression is a number literal.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function once
has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def once(expr, deep=False):
""" run all filters and return the first available simplification """
for filter in __all__:
newexpr = filter(expr)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function once. (10) Open
def once(expr, deep=False):
""" run all filters and return the first available simplification """
for filter in __all__:
newexpr = filter(expr)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function correct_signs. (7) Open
@simplifier
def correct_signs(expr):
""" substitute addition or substraction by its inverse depending on the operand sign
x + -y becomes x - y
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function equality_with_literals. (6) Open
@simplifier
def equality_with_literals(expr):
""" Applies commutativity of equality (==) sign
(<1> - n1) == n2 becomes <1> == n3 where n3 = n1 + n2
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cyclomatic Complexity
Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.
Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:
Construct | Effect on CC | Reasoning |
---|---|---|
if | +1 | An if statement is a single decision. |
elif | +1 | The elif statement adds another decision. |
else | +0 | The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if. |
for | +1 | There is a decision at the start of the loop. |
while | +1 | There is a decision at the while statement. |
except | +1 | Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution. |
finally | +0 | The finally block is unconditionally executed. |
with | +1 | The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details). |
assert | +1 | The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement. |
Comprehension | +1 | A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop. |
Boolean Operator | +1 | Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point. |
Function negate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def negate(expr):
""" transform negations into simpler, more readable forms
!(a && b) becomes !a || !b
!(a || b) becomes !a && !b
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if isinstance(op, assignable_t):
op.unlink()
expr.replace(newexpr)
Function flags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def flags(expr):
""" transform flags operations into simpler expressions such as lower-than
or greater-than.
unsigned stuff:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function add_sub
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_sub(expr):
""" Simplify nested math expressions when the second operand of
each expression is a number literal.
(a +/- n1) +/- n2 => (a +/- n3) with n3 = n1 +/- n2
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return aeq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return lower_t(expr.op1.op1.pluck(), expr.op1.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return cls(expr.op1.op1.pluck(), expr.op1.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return above_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return leq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return expr.op.op.pluck()
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return cls(expr.op1.op1.pluck(), expr.op1.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return _expr
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return eq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), neg_t(expr.op.op2.pluck()))
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return b_not_t(expr.op1.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return lower_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return eq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
Function equalities
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def equalities(expr):
""" equalities """
# a == b || a > b becomes a >= b
# a == b || a < b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op1) in (add_t, sub_t) \
and type(expr.op1.op2) == value_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
_expr = expr.op1.pluck()
_expr.add(expr.op2)
return _expr
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op1) in (add_t, sub_t) \
and type(expr.op1.op2) == value_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
_expr = expr.op1.pluck()
_expr.sub(expr.op2)
return _expr
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 87.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
type(expr.op1) == eq_t and type(expr.op2) in (leq_t, aeq_t) and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
type(expr.op1) in (leq_t, aeq_t) and type(expr.op2) == eq_t and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
type(expr.op1) in (lower_t, above_t) and type(expr.op2) == eq_t and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
type(expr.op1) == eq_t and type(expr.op2) in (lower_t, above_t) and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t and expr.op2.value < 0:
return add_t(expr.op1.pluck(), value_t(abs(expr.op2.value), expr.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t and expr.op2.value < 0:
return sub_t(expr.op1.pluck(), value_t(abs(expr.op2.value), expr.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 73.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
is_greater = lambda expr: type(expr) == eq_t and \
type(expr.op1) == sign_t and type(expr.op2) == overflow_t and \
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
is_less = lambda expr: type(expr) == neq_t and \
type(expr.op1) == sign_t and type(expr.op2) == overflow_t and \
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 66.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_and_t:
return b_or_t(b_not_t(expr.op.op1.pluck()), b_not_t(expr.op.op2.pluck()))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_or_t:
return b_and_t(b_not_t(expr.op.op1.pluck()), b_not_t(expr.op.op2.pluck()))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == eq_t:
return neq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == above_t:
return leq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == leq_t:
return above_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == neq_t:
return eq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == aeq_t:
return lower_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == lower_t:
return aeq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 7 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == sub_t:
return eq_t(expr.op.op1.pluck(), expr.op.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_and_t and \
type(expr.op1) in (leq_t, aeq_t, above_t, lower_t) and type(expr.op2) == neq_t and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op1)]
return cls(expr.op1.op1.pluck(), expr.op1.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_and_t and \
type(expr.op1) == neq_t and type(expr.op2) in (leq_t, aeq_t, above_t, lower_t) and \
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op2)]
return cls(expr.op1.op1.pluck(), expr.op1.op2.pluck())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == address_t and type(expr.op) == deref_t:
return expr.op.op.pluck()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_not_t:
return expr.op.op.pluck()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == deref_t and type(expr.op) == address_t:
return expr.op.op.pluck()
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op1) == value_t \
and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op1) == value_t \
and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 41.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
elif is_greater(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
elif is_lower(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) in (sub_t, add_t):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a - b) becomes a == b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Multiple spaces after operator Open
cls = {lower_t: leq_t, above_t: aeq_t}[type(expr.op1)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace around an operator.
Okay: a = 12 + 3
E221: a = 4 + 5
E222: a = 4 + 5
E223: a = 4\t+ 5
E224: a = 4 +\t5
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a >= b || a == b becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" run all filters and return the first available simplification """
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
for filter in __all__:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return newexpr
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Inline comment should start with '# ' Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_greater = lambda expr: type(expr) == eq_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Inline comment should start with '# ' Open
is_lower = lambda expr: type(expr) == carry_t #and type(expr.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# signed less-than
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
_value = value_t(expr.op2.value - expr.op1.op2.value, max(expr.op2.size, expr.op1.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a != b && a < b becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (90 > 79 characters) Open
type(expr.op1) == neq_t and type(expr.op2) in (leq_t, aeq_t, above_t, lower_t) and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
def once(expr, deep=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if expr.parent:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
newexpr = once(op, deep)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_leq = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_or_t and type(expr.op1) == b_not_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
elif is_above(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return expr.op1.pluck()
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == address_t and type(expr.op) == deref_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
type(expr.op1) in (sub_t, add_t) and type(expr.op1.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == eq_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(!(expr)) becomes expr
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a > b) becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a >= b) becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == aeq_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a + b) becomes a == -b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a - b > 0 becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a == b || a >= b becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_and_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a > b && a != b becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if isinstance(op, assignable_t):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
def simplifier(func):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_less = lambda expr: type(expr) == neq_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_less = lambda expr: type(expr) == neq_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_aeq = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_and_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" Applies commutativity of equality (==) sign
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
_value = value_t(expr.op2.value + expr.op1.op2.value, max(expr.op2.size, expr.op1.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == neq_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == above_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
type(expr.op1) == sign_t and type(expr.op2) == overflow_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a <= b) becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (80 > 79 characters) Open
is_leq = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_or_t and type(expr.op1) == b_not_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a < b && a != b becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
and type(expr.op1.op2) == value_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Multiple spaces after operator Open
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op1)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace around an operator.
Okay: a = 12 + 3
E221: a = 4 + 5
E222: a = 4 + 5
E223: a = 4\t+ 5
E224: a = 4 +\t5
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_or_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Multiple spaces after operator Open
cls = {lower_t: leq_t, above_t: aeq_t}[type(expr.op2)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace around an operator.
Okay: a = 12 + 3
E221: a = 4 + 5
E222: a = 4 + 5
E223: a = 4\t+ 5
E224: a = 4 +\t5
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a != b && a >= b becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == xor_t and expr.op1 == expr.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if newexpr:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
def run(expr, deep=False):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" combine expressions until they cannot be combined any more.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_greater = lambda expr: type(expr) == eq_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
type(expr.op1) == sign_t and type(expr.op2) == overflow_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
At least two spaces before inline comment Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
and type(expr.op1.op2) == value_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) in (lower_t, above_t) and type(expr.op1) == sub_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a <= b && a != b becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t and expr.op2.value < 0:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
__all__.append(func)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
elif is_aeq(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == and_t and expr.op1 == expr.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op1) == value_t \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (98 > 79 characters) Open
_value = value_t(expr.op2.value + expr.op1.op2.value, max(expr.op2.size, expr.op1.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Line too long (98 > 79 characters) Open
_value = value_t(expr.op2.value - expr.op1.op2.value, max(expr.op2.size, expr.op1.op2.size))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a != b) becomes a == b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return expr
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_lower = lambda expr: type(expr) == carry_t #and type(expr.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
type(expr.op2) in (above_t, aeq_t) and expr.op1 == expr.op2.op1
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if is_less(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
else:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" transform negations into simpler, more readable forms
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a && b) becomes !a || !b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == leq_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a == b || a < b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Multiple spaces after operator Open
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op2)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Avoid extraneous whitespace around an operator.
Okay: a = 12 + 3
E221: a = 4 + 5
E222: a = 4 + 5
E223: a = 4\t+ 5
E224: a = 4 +\t5
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_and_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" transform the and (&) operator into a simpler form in the special case
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_lower = lambda expr: type(expr) == carry_t #and type(expr.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_aeq = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_and_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == eq_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t and expr.op2.value == 0:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == sub_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" equalities """
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (90 > 79 characters) Open
type(expr.op1) in (leq_t, aeq_t, above_t, lower_t) and type(expr.op2) == neq_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_above = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_not_t and is_lower(expr.op)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
elif is_leq(expr):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == add_t and type(expr.op1) in (add_t, sub_t) \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" remove nested deref_t and address_t that cancel each other
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a == b) becomes a != b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a == b || a > b becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (95 > 79 characters) Open
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op2)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
while True:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
break
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" transform flags operations into simpler expressions such as lower-than
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
At least two spaces before inline comment Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" Simplify nested math expressions when the second operand of
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op1) == value_t \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == deref_t and type(expr.op) == address_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a > b || a == b becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (95 > 79 characters) Open
cls = {leq_t: lower_t, aeq_t: above_t, above_t: above_t, lower_t: lower_t}[type(expr.op1)]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op1) in (add_t, sub_t) \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a - b < 0 becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a < b || a == b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a <= b || a == b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a != b && a > b becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" substitute addition or substraction by its inverse depending on the operand sign
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == sub_t and type(expr.op2) == value_t and expr.op2.value < 0:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# signed greater-than
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# above-or-equal
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_and_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a < b) becomes a >= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# unsigned lower-than
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Line too long (100 > 79 characters) Open
if type(expr) in (eq_t, neq_t, above_t, lower_t, aeq_t, leq_t) and type(expr.op2) == value_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) in (eq_t, neq_t, above_t, lower_t, aeq_t, leq_t) and type(expr.op2) == value_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a == 0 becomes !a
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == add_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a == b || a <= b becomes a <= b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_or_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if deep and isinstance(expr, expr_t):
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Inline comment should start with '# ' Open
expr.op1.op == expr.op2.op #and type(expr.op1.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
At least two spaces before inline comment Open
is_lower = lambda expr: type(expr) == carry_t #and type(expr.op) == sub_t
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate inline comments by at least two spaces.
An inline comment is a comment on the same line as a statement.
Inline comments should be separated by at least two spaces from the
statement. They should start with a # and a single space.
Each line of a block comment starts with a # and a single space
(unless it is indented text inside the comment).
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: x = x + 1 # Increment x
Okay: # Block comment
E261: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 #Increment x
E262: x = x + 1 # Increment x
E265: #Block comment
E266: ### Block comment
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# unsigned above-than
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# less-or-equal
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Continuation line with same indent as next logical line Open
expr.op1.op1 == expr.op2.op1 and expr.op1.op2 == expr.op2.op2:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a >= b && a != b becomes a > b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
""" transform xor_t into a literal 0 if both operands to the xor are the same
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
is_above = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_not_t and is_lower(expr.op)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Do not assign a lambda expression, use a def Open
is_leq = lambda expr: type(expr) == b_or_t and type(expr.op1) == b_not_t and \
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Compound statements (on the same line) are generally discouraged.
While sometimes it's okay to put an if/for/while with a small body
on the same line, never do this for multi-clause statements.
Also avoid folding such long lines!
Always use a def statement instead of an assignment statement that
binds a lambda expression directly to a name.
Okay: if foo == 'blah':\n do_blah_thing()
Okay: do_one()
Okay: do_two()
Okay: do_three()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: for x in lst: total += x
E701: while t < 10: t = delay()
E701: if foo == 'blah': do_blah_thing()
E701: else: do_non_blah_thing()
E701: try: something()
E701: finally: cleanup()
E701: if foo == 'blah': one(); two(); three()
E702: do_one(); do_two(); do_three()
E703: do_four(); # useless semicolon
E704: def f(x): return 2*x
E731: f = lambda x: 2*x
Continuation line over-indented for visual indent Open
type(expr.op2) == lower_t and expr.op1.op == expr.op2
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Continuation lines indentation.
Continuation lines should align wrapped elements either vertically
using Python's implicit line joining inside parentheses, brackets
and braces, or using a hanging indent.
When using a hanging indent these considerations should be applied:
- there should be no arguments on the first line, and
- further indentation should be used to clearly distinguish itself
as a continuation line.
Okay: a = (\n)
E123: a = (\n )
Okay: a = (\n 42)
E121: a = (\n 42)
E122: a = (\n42)
E123: a = (\n 42\n )
E124: a = (24,\n 42\n)
E125: if (\n b):\n pass
E126: a = (\n 42)
E127: a = (24,\n 42)
E128: a = (24,\n 42)
E129: if (a or\n b):\n pass
E131: a = (\n 42\n 24)
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return lower_t(op.pluck(), value_t(0, op.size))
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# !(a || b) becomes !a && !b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == b_not_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
if type(expr) == b_not_t and type(expr.op) == lower_t:
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 (comment) Open
# a != b && a <= b becomes a < b
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Indentation is not a multiple of 4 Open
return
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use indent_size (PEP8 says 4) spaces per indentation level.
For really old code that you don't want to mess up, you can continue
to use 8-space tabs.
Okay: a = 1
Okay: if a == 0:\n a = 1
E111: a = 1
E114: # a = 1
Okay: for item in items:\n pass
E112: for item in items:\npass
E115: for item in items:\n# Hi\n pass
Okay: a = 1\nb = 2
E113: a = 1\n b = 2
E116: a = 1\n # b = 2
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass
Line too long (86 > 79 characters) Open
""" substitute addition or substraction by its inverse depending on the operand sign
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Limit all lines to a maximum of 79 characters.
There are still many devices around that are limited to 80 character
lines; plus, limiting windows to 80 characters makes it possible to
have several windows side-by-side. The default wrapping on such
devices looks ugly. Therefore, please limit all lines to a maximum
of 79 characters. For flowing long blocks of text (docstrings or
comments), limiting the length to 72 characters is recommended.
Reports error E501.
Expected 2 blank lines, found 1 Open
@simplifier
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Separate top-level function and class definitions with two blank lines.
Method definitions inside a class are separated by a single blank
line.
Extra blank lines may be used (sparingly) to separate groups of
related functions. Blank lines may be omitted between a bunch of
related one-liners (e.g. a set of dummy implementations).
Use blank lines in functions, sparingly, to indicate logical
sections.
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\nasync def b():\n pass
Okay: def a():\n pass\n\n\n# Foo\n# Bar\n\ndef b():\n pass
Okay: default = 1\nfoo = 1
Okay: classify = 1\nfoo = 1
E301: class Foo:\n b = 0\n def bar():\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E302: def a():\n pass\n\nasync def b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n pass\n\n\n\ndef b(n):\n pass
E303: def a():\n\n\n\n pass
E304: @decorator\n\ndef a():\n pass
E305: def a():\n pass\na()
E306: def a():\n def b():\n pass\n def c():\n pass