Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def subs_lhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @x }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def subs_rhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @y }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for subs_lhs is too high. [17.52/15] Open
def subs_lhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @x }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for subs_rhs is too high. [17.52/15] Open
def subs_rhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @y }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [12/10] Open
def simplify
hash = @x.to_s
@x = @x.simplify
while @x.to_s != hash
hash = @x.to_s
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Method subs_lhs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def subs_lhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @x }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method subs_rhs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def subs_rhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @y }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def subs_rhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @y }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def subs_lhs(dt)
CAS::Help.assert(dt, Hash)
sub = dt.keys.select { |e| e == @x }[0]
if sub
if dt[sub].is_a? CAS::Op
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 61.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Line is too long. [85/80] Open
raise CASError, "Impossible subs. Received a #{dt[sub].class} = #{dt[sub]}"
- Exclude checks
When defining the ==
operator, name its argument other
. Open
def ==(op)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop makes sure that certain binary operator methods have their
sole parameter named other
.
Example:
# bad
def +(amount); end
# good
def +(other); end
Missing top-level module documentation comment. Open
module CAS
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.
The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.
Example:
# bad
class Person
# ...
end
# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
# ...
end
Favor modifier if
usage when having a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow &&
/||
. Open
if y.is_a? Numeric
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for if and unless statements that would fit on one line
if written as a modifier if/unless. The maximum line length is
configured in the Metrics/LineLength
cop.
Example:
# bad
if condition
do_stuff(bar)
end
unless qux.empty?
Foo.do_something
end
# good
do_stuff(bar) if condition
Foo.do_something unless qux.empty?
Line is too long. [107/80] Open
# * **argument**: `CAS::Op` right argument of the node or `Numeric` to be converted in `CAS::Constant`
- Exclude checks
Use ||
instead of or
. Open
@x.depend? v or @y.depend? v
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of and
and or
, and suggests using &&
and
|| instead
. It can be configured to check only in conditions, or in
all contexts.
Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)
# bad
foo.save and return
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: conditionals
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
foo.save and return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Do not place comments on the same line as the end
keyword. Open
end # BinaryOp
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for comments put on the same line as some keywords.
These keywords are: begin
, class
, def
, end
, module
.
Note that some comments (such as :nodoc:
and rubocop:disable
) are
allowed.
Example:
# bad
if condition
statement
end # end if
# bad
class X # comment
statement
end
# bad
def x; end # comment
# good
if condition
statement
end
# good
class X # :nodoc:
y
end
Redundant return
detected. To return multiple values, use an array. Open
return left, right
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant return
detected. Open
return self
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Redundant self
detected. Open
return self.subs_lhs(dt).subs_rhs(dt)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant uses of self
.
The usage of self
is only needed when:
Sending a message to same object with zero arguments in presence of a method name clash with an argument or a local variable.
Calling an attribute writer to prevent an local variable assignment.
Note, with using explicit self you can only send messages with public or protected scope, you cannot send private messages this way.
Note we allow uses of self
with operators because it would be awkward
otherwise.
Example:
# bad
def foo(bar)
self.baz
end
# good
def foo(bar)
self.bar # Resolves name clash with the argument.
end
def foo
bar = 1
self.bar # Resolves name clash with the local variable.
end
def foo
%w[x y z].select do |bar|
self.bar == bar # Resolves name clash with argument of the block.
end
end
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
raise CAS::CASError, "Not implemented. This is a virtual method"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression. Open
if op.is_a? CAS::BinaryOp
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression
Example:
# bad
def test
if something
work
end
end
# good
def test
return unless something
work
end
# also good
def test
work if something
end
# bad
if something
raise 'exception'
else
ok
end
# good
raise 'exception' if something
ok
Line is too long. [106/80] Open
# * **argument**: `CAS::Op` left argument of the node or `Numeric` to be converted in `CAS::Constant`
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [85/80] Open
raise CASError, "Impossible subs. Received a #{dt[sub].class} = #{dt[sub]}"
- Exclude checks
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
raise CAS::CASError, "Not Implemented. This is a virtual method"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Favor modifier if
usage when having a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow &&
/||
. Open
if x.is_a? Numeric
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for if and unless statements that would fit on one line
if written as a modifier if/unless. The maximum line length is
configured in the Metrics/LineLength
cop.
Example:
# bad
if condition
do_stuff(bar)
end
unless qux.empty?
Foo.do_something
end
# good
do_stuff(bar) if condition
Foo.do_something unless qux.empty?
Redundant return
detected. Open
return self.subs_lhs(dt).subs_rhs(dt)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Use &&
instead of and
. Open
return (self.class == op.class and @x == op.x and @y == op.y)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of and
and or
, and suggests using &&
and
|| instead
. It can be configured to check only in conditions, or in
all contexts.
Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)
# bad
foo.save and return
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: conditionals
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
foo.save and return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Redundant return
detected. Open
return self
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for redundant return
expressions.
Example:
def test
return something
end
def test
one
two
three
return something
end
It should be extended to handle methods whose body is if/else or a case expression with a default branch.
Do not use ::
for method calls. Open
@x = CAS::const dt[sub]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for methods invoked via the :: operator instead of the . operator (like FileUtils::rmdir instead of FileUtils.rmdir).
Example:
# bad
Timeout::timeout(500) { do_something }
FileUtils::rmdir(dir)
Marshal::dump(obj)
# good
Timeout.timeout(500) { do_something }
FileUtils.rmdir(dir)
Marshal.dump(obj)
Script file bary-op.rb doesn't have execute permission. Open
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
- Exclude checks
Use &&
instead of and
. Open
return (self.class == op.class and @x == op.x and @y == op.y)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of and
and or
, and suggests using &&
and
|| instead
. It can be configured to check only in conditions, or in
all contexts.
Example: EnforcedStyle: always (default)
# bad
foo.save and return
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: conditionals
# bad
if foo and bar
end
# good
foo.save && return
# good
foo.save and return
# good
if foo && bar
end
Line is too long. [86/80] Open
# * **returns**: `Array` of differentiated branches ([0] for left, [1] for right)
- Exclude checks
Do not use ::
for method calls. Open
@y = CAS::const dt[sub]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for methods invoked via the :: operator instead of the . operator (like FileUtils::rmdir instead of FileUtils.rmdir).
Example:
# bad
Timeout::timeout(500) { do_something }
FileUtils::rmdir(dir)
Marshal::dump(obj)
# good
Timeout.timeout(500) { do_something }
FileUtils.rmdir(dir)
Marshal.dump(obj)
Do not use parallel assignment. Open
left, right = CAS::Zero, CAS::Zero
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for simple usages of parallel assignment. This will only complain when the number of variables being assigned matched the number of assigning variables.
Example:
# bad
a, b, c = 1, 2, 3
a, b, c = [1, 2, 3]
# good
one, two = *foo
a, b = foo()
a, b = b, a
a = 1
b = 2
c = 3
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
raise CAS::CASError, "Not Implemented. This is a virtual method"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"