Sign upLogin

MediaMath/t1-python

View on GitHub
Star
terminalone/vendor/six.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File six.py has 671 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# Copyright (c) 2010-2017 Benjamin Peterson
#
# Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
# of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
# in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
Severity: Major
Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 1 day to fix

    Function print_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def print_(*args, **kwargs):
        """The new-style print function for Python 2.4 and 2.5."""
        fp = kwargs.pop("file", sys.stdout)
        if fp is None:
            return
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 7 hrs to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in function print_. (17)
    Open

        def print_(*args, **kwargs):
        """The new-style print function for Python 2.4 and 2.5."""
        fp = kwargs.pop("file", sys.stdout)
        if fp is None:
            return
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Cyclomatic complexity is too high in method __init__. (6)
    Open

        def __init__(self, name, old_mod, new_mod, old_attr=None, new_attr=None):
        super(MovedAttribute, self).__init__(name)
        if PY3:
            if new_mod is None:
                new_mod = name
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py by radon

    Cyclomatic Complexity

    Cyclomatic Complexity corresponds to the number of decisions a block of code contains plus 1. This number (also called McCabe number) is equal to the number of linearly independent paths through the code. This number can be used as a guide when testing conditional logic in blocks.

    Radon analyzes the AST tree of a Python program to compute Cyclomatic Complexity. Statements have the following effects on Cyclomatic Complexity:

    Construct Effect on CC Reasoning
    if +1 An if statement is a single decision.
    elif +1 The elif statement adds another decision.
    else +0 The else statement does not cause a new decision. The decision is at the if.
    for +1 There is a decision at the start of the loop.
    while +1 There is a decision at the while statement.
    except +1 Each except branch adds a new conditional path of execution.
    finally +0 The finally block is unconditionally executed.
    with +1 The with statement roughly corresponds to a try/except block (see PEP 343 for details).
    assert +1 The assert statement internally roughly equals a conditional statement.
    Comprehension +1 A list/set/dict comprehension of generator expression is equivalent to a for loop.
    Boolean Operator +1 Every boolean operator (and, or) adds a decision point.

    Source: http://radon.readthedocs.org/en/latest/intro.html

    Function __init__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, name, old_mod, new_mod, old_attr=None, new_attr=None):
        super(MovedAttribute, self).__init__(name)
        if PY3:
            if new_mod is None:
                new_mod = name
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function add_metaclass has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def add_metaclass(metaclass):
    """Class decorator for creating a class with a metaclass."""
    def wrapper(cls):
        orig_vars = cls.__dict__.copy()
        slots = orig_vars.get('__slots__')
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __init__ has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __init__(self, name, old_mod, new_mod, old_attr=None, new_attr=None):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Function exec_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def exec_(_code_, _globs_=None, _locs_=None):
        """Execute code in a namespace."""
        if _globs_ is None:
            frame = sys._getframe(1)
            _globs_ = frame.f_globals
      Severity: Minor
      Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              if end is not None:
            if isinstance(end, unicode):
                want_unicode = True
            elif not isinstance(end, str):
                raise TypeError("end must be None or a string")
      Severity: Major
      Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      terminalone/vendor/six.py on lines 760..764

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 45.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

              if sep is not None:
            if isinstance(sep, unicode):
                want_unicode = True
            elif not isinstance(sep, str):
                raise TypeError("sep must be None or a string")
      Severity: Major
      Found in terminalone/vendor/six.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      terminalone/vendor/six.py on lines 766..770

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 45.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      There are no issues that match your filters.

      Category
      Status