Showing 176 of 176 total issues
Method other_patches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.other_patches
patches = []
patches << 'mongo' if defined?(Mongo::Server::Connection) && Mongo.class == Module
patches << 'moped' if defined?(Moped::Node) && Moped::Node.class == Class
patches << 'plucky' if defined?(Plucky::Query) && Plucky::Query.class == Class
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' <tr class="';if(it.timing.is_trivial){out+='profiler-trivial';}out+='" data-timing-id="'+( it.timing.id )+'"> <td class="profiler-label" title="';if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+=''+( it.timing.name );}out+='"> <span class="profiler-indent">'+( MiniProfiler.renderIndent(it.timing.depth) )+'</span> '+( it.timing.name.slice(0,45) );if(it.timing.name && it.timing.name.length > 45){out+='...';}out+=' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="duration of this step without any children\'s durations"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_without_children_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration profiler-duration-with-children" title="duration of this step and its children"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration time-from-start" title="time elapsed since profiling started"> <span class="profiler-unit">+</span>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.start_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';if(it.timing.has_sql_timings){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='profiler-warning';}out+='" title="';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='duplicate queries detected - ';}if(it.timing.executed_readers > 0 || it.timing.executed_scalars > 0 || it.timing.executed_non_queries > 0){out+=''+( it.timing.executed_readers )+' reader, '+( it.timing.executed_scalars )+' scalar, '+( it.timing.executed_non_queries )+' non-query statements executed';}out+='"> <a class="profiler-queries-show"> ';if(it.timing.has_duplicate_sql_timings){out+='<span class="profiler-nuclear">!</span>';}out+=' '+( it.timing.sql_timings.length )+' <span class="profiler-unit">sql</span> </a> </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all queries in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.sql_timings_duration_milliseconds) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';var arr1=it.page.custom_timing_names;if(arr1){var value,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){value=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' ';if(it.timing.custom_timings && it.timing.custom_timings[value]){out+=' <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate number of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( it.timing.custom_timings[value].length )+' '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' </td> <td class="profiler-duration" title="aggregate duration of all '+( value.toLowerCase() )+' invocations in this step (excludes children)"> '+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(it.timing.custom_timing_stats[value].duration) )+' </td> ';}else{out+=' <td colspan="2"></td> ';}out+=' ';} } out+=' </tr> ';if(it.timing.has_children){out+=' ';var arr2=it.timing.children;if(arr2){var value,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){value=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.templates.timingTemplate({timing: value, page: it.page}) )+' ';} } out+=' ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.shareUrl(it.page.id) )+'" class="profiler-share-profiler-results" target="_blank">share</a> <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.moreUrl(it.page.name) )+'" class="profiler-more-actions">more</a> ';if(it.page.has_flamegraph){out+=' <a href="'+( MiniProfiler.flamegraphUrl(it.page.id) )+'" class="profiler-show-flamegraph" target="_blank">flamegraph</a> ';}out+=' ';if(it.custom_link){out+=' <a href="'+( it.custom_link )+'" class="profiler-custom-link" target="_blank">'+( it.custom_link_name )+'</a> ';}out+=' ';if(it.page.has_trivial_timings){out+=' <a class="profiler-toggle-trivial" data-show-on-load="'+( it.page.has_all_trivial_timings )+'" title="toggles any rows with < '+( it.page.trivial_duration_threshold_milliseconds )+' ms"> show trivial </a> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 49.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!(s < 65 || g > 122)) {
s < 65 || g > 90 || a.push([Math.max(65, g) | 32, Math.min(s, 90) | 32]);
s < 97 || g > 122 || a.push([Math.max(97, g) & -33, Math.min(s, 122) & -33]);
}
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if (!(s < 65 || g > 122)) {
s < 65 || g > 90 || a.push([Math.max(65, g) | 32, Math.min(s, 90) | 32]);
s < 97 || g > 122 || a.push([Math.max(97, g) & -33, Math.min(s, 122) & -33]);
}
Method exec_insert
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def exec_insert(sql, name, binds, pk = nil, sequence_name = nil)
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
me.nextGap = {
duration: (root.duration_milliseconds - time).toFixed(2),
start: time,
finish: root.duration_milliseconds
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
r.prevGap = {
duration: (r.start_milliseconds - time).toFixed(2),
start: time,
finish: r.start_milliseconds
};
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method cleanup_cache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def cleanup_cache
files = Dir.entries(@path)
@timer_struct_lock.synchronize {
files.each do |f|
f = @path + '/' + f
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method sql_patches
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.sql_patches
patches = []
patches << 'mysql2' if defined?(Mysql2::Client) && Mysql2::Client.class == Class && patch_rails?
patches << 'pg' if defined?(PG::Result) && PG::Result.class == Class && patch_rails?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rails_route_from_path
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def rails_route_from_path(path, method)
if defined?(Rails) && defined?(ActionController::RoutingError)
hash = Rails.application.routes.recognize_path(path, method: method)
if hash && hash[:controller] && hash[:action]
"#{hash[:controller]}##{hash[:action]}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method record_sql
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def record_sql(query, elapsed_ms, params = nil)
return unless current && current.current_timer
c = current
c.current_timer.add_sql(
redact_sql_queries? ? nil : query,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' ';if(it.list && it.list.length){out+=' <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>Requests Group</th> <th>Worst Time (ms)</th> <th>Best Time (ms)</th> <th>No. of Snapshots</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr1=it.list;if(arr1){var row,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){row=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <tr> <td class="request-group"><a href="'+( row.url )+'">'+( row.name )+'</a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.worst_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.best_score) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.snapshots_count )+'</td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots exist</h2> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var out=' '; var data = it.data; out+=' '; var customFieldsNames = it.allCustomFieldsNames; out+=' ';if(data.list && data.list.length){out+=' <h2>Snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> <table class="snapshots-table"> <thead> <tr> <th>ID</th> <th>Duration (ms)</th> <th>SQL Count</th> ';var arr1=customFieldsNames;if(arr1){var name,i1=-1,l1=arr1.length-1;while(i1<l1){name=arr1[i1+=1];out+=' <th>'+( name )+'</th> ';} } out+=' <th>Age</th> </tr> </thead> <tbody> ';var arr2=data.list;if(arr2){var row,i2=-1,l2=arr2.length-1;while(i2<l2){row=arr2[i2+=1];out+=' <tr> <td><a href="'+( row.url )+'"> '+( row.id )+' </a></td> <td>'+( MiniProfiler.formatDuration(row.duration) )+'</td> <td>'+( row.sql_count )+'</td> ';var arr3=customFieldsNames;if(arr3){var name,i3=-1,l3=arr3.length-1;while(i3<l3){name=arr3[i3+=1];out+=' <td>'+( row.custom_fields[name] || "" )+'</td> ';} } out+=' <td> ';if(row.timestamp){out+=' '+( MiniProfiler.timestampToRelative(row.timestamp) )+' ';}out+=' </td> </tr> ';} } out+=' </tbody> </table> ';}else{out+=' <h2>No snapshots for '+( data.group_name )+'</h2> ';}return out;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return client_settings.handle_cookie(dump_exceptions exceptions)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return client_settings.handle_cookie(self.flamegraph(flamegraph, path, env))
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return tool_disabled_message(client_settings) if !advanced_debugging_enabled?
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return client_settings.handle_cookie(
text_result(message, status: status, headers: headers)
)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return client_settings.handle_cookie(analyze_memory)
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return client_settings.handle_cookie(dump_env env)