File item.rb
has 1307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require EnjuTrunkFrbr::Engine.root.join('app', 'models', 'item')
require EnjuTrunkCirculation::Engine.root.join('app', 'models', 'item') if Setting.operation
require EnjuTrunkOrder::Engine.root.join('app', 'models', 'item') if defined? EnjuTrunkOrder
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
extend ActiveRecordExtension
Method export_removing_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 96 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.export_removing_list(out_dir, file_type = nil)
raise "invalid parameter: no path" if out_dir.nil? || out_dir.length < 1
tsv_file = out_dir + "removing_list.tsv"
pdf_file = out_dir + "removing_list.pdf"
logger.info "output removing_list tsv: #{tsv_file} pdf: #{pdf_file}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_item_register_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 76 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_pdf(pdf_file, items, list_title = nil)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('item_register.tlf')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class Item
has 60 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Item < ActiveRecord::Base
extend ActiveRecordExtension
attr_accessible :library_id, :shelf_id, :checkout_type_id, :circulation_status_id,
:retention_period_id, :call_number, :bookstore_id, :price, :price_string, :url,
:include_supplements, :use_restriction_id, :required_role_id,
Method make_audio_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
[:carrier_type, 'activerecord.models.carrier_type'],
[:shelf, 'activerecord.models.shelf'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_item_register_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
['acquired_at_string', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at_string'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_catalog_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 33 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_catalog_pdf(pdf_file, manifestations, list_title = nil)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report("#{list_title}.tlf")
#report page
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method export_removing_list
has 94 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.export_removing_list(out_dir, file_type = nil)
raise "invalid parameter: no path" if out_dir.nil? || out_dir.length < 1
tsv_file = out_dir + "removing_list.tsv"
pdf_file = out_dir + "removing_list.pdf"
logger.info "output removing_list tsv: #{tsv_file} pdf: #{pdf_file}"
Method make_export_series_statements_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_list_pdf(items, acquired_at)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('series_statements_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_series_statements_latest_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_latest_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
columns = [
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_series_statements_latest_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_latest_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('series_statements_latest_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_removed_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_removed_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_book_term('removed_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_new_book_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_book_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('new_book_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method is_original?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def is_original?
if self.rank == 0
manifestation = nil
if self.manifestation
manifestation = self.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_price
has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_price
record = Expense.where(:item_id => self.id).order("id DESC").first
begin
unless record.nil?
record.acquired_at_ym = select_acquired_at
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_item_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_item_list_pdf(items, filename)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_book_list('item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_new_item_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_item_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_book_list('new_item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_item_register_tsv
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
['acquired_at_string', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at_string'],
Method make_audio_list_tsv
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
[:carrier_type, 'activerecord.models.carrier_type'],
[:shelf, 'activerecord.models.shelf'],
Method make_audio_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_pdf(pdf_file, items)
filename = I18n.t('item_register.audio_list')
report = EnjuTrunk.new_item_list('item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if items.nil? || items.size < 1
logger.warn "item data is empty"
else
items.each do |item|
row = []
Method make_export_series_statements_list_tsv
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_list_tsv(items, acquired_at)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
# set term
Method excel_worksheet_value
has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def excel_worksheet_value(ws_type, ws_col, sep_flg, ccount)
helper = Object.new
helper.extend(ItemsHelper)
helper.instance_eval { def t(*a) I18n.t(*a) end } # NOTE: ItemsHelper#i18n_rankの中でtを呼び出しているが、ヘルパーを直接利用しようとするとRedCloth由来のtが見えてしまうため、その回避策
val = nil
Method make_export_removed_list_tsv
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_removed_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
columns = [
Method make_item_register_pdf
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_pdf(pdf_file, items, list_title = nil)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('item_register.tlf')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
end
Method make_export_new_item_list_tsv
has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_item_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
# set term
Method make_export_new_book_list_tsv
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_book_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
# set term
Method make_export_series_statements_latest_list_tsv
has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_latest_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
columns = [
Method make_export_item_list_tsv
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_item_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
Method excel_worksheet_value
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def excel_worksheet_value(ws_type, ws_col, sep_flg, ccount)
helper = Object.new
helper.extend(ItemsHelper)
helper.instance_eval { def t(*a) I18n.t(*a) end } # NOTE: ItemsHelper#i18n_rankの中でtを呼び出しているが、ヘルパーを直接利用しようとするとRedCloth由来のtが見えてしまうため、その回避策
val = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_removed_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_removed_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
columns = [
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_price
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_price
record = Expense.where(:item_id => self.id).order("id DESC").first
begin
unless record.nil?
record.acquired_at_ym = select_acquired_at
Method make_export_series_statements_list_pdf
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_list_pdf(items, acquired_at)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('series_statements_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Method make_catalog_pdf
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_catalog_pdf(pdf_file, manifestations, list_title = nil)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report("#{list_title}.tlf")
#report page
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
Method check_remove_item
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_remove_item
if self.circulation_status_id == CirculationStatus.where(name: 'Removed').first.try(:id) or self.remove_reason
self.removed_at = Time.zone.now if self.removed_at.nil?
manifestation = nil
if self.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_new_book_list_pdf
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_book_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('new_book_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Method make_export_series_statements_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_series_statements_list_tsv(items, acquired_at)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
# set term
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_new_item_list_pdf
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_item_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_book_list('new_item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Method perform
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
fn = "#{file_name}.#{file_type}"
user_file = UserFile.new(user)
url = nil
logger.error "SQL start at #{Time.now}"
Method perform
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
user_file = UserFile.new(user)
# get data
query = Marshal.load(dumped_query)
Method make_audio_list_pdf
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_pdf(pdf_file, items)
filename = I18n.t('item_register.audio_list')
report = EnjuTrunk.new_item_list('item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if items.nil? || items.size < 1
logger.warn "item data is empty"
else
items.each do |item|
row = []
Method perform
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
user_file = UserFile.new(user)
# get data
query = Marshal.load(dumped_query)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(job_name, file_name, file_type, method, dumped_query, args, user)
Method make_export_item_list_job
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_item_list_job(file_name, file_type, method, dumped_query, args, user)
Method initialize
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(job_name, file_name, file_type, method, args, user)
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
row << item.manifestation.date_of_publication.strftime("%Y/%m/%d") rescue ""
Method export_item_register
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.export_item_register(type, out_dir, file_type = nil)
raise "invalid parameter: no path" if out_dir.nil? || out_dir.length < 1
tsv_file = out_dir + "item_register_#{type}.tsv"
pdf_file = out_dir + "item_register_#{type}.pdf"
logger.info "output item_register_#{type} tsv: #{tsv_file} pdf: #{pdf_file}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_catalog
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_catalog(type, out_dir, file_type = nil)
raise "invalid parameter: no path" if out_dir.nil? || out_dir.length < 1
pdf_file = out_dir + "#{type}_catalog.pdf"
logger.info "output #{type}_catalog pdf: #{pdf_file}"
FileUtils.mkdir_p(out_dir) unless FileTest.exist?(out_dir)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_export_register_job
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_register_job(file_name, file_type, method, args, user)
Method make_export_new_item_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_item_list_tsv(items)
data = String.new
data << "\xEF\xBB\xBF".force_encoding("UTF-8") + "\n"
# set term
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has_view_role?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def has_view_role?(current_role_id)
current_role_id = Role.default_role.id unless current_role_id
if self.required_role_id <= current_role_id && (self.shelf.required_role_id.nil? || self.shelf.required_role_id <= current_role_id)
return TRUE
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method export_audio_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.export_audio_list(out_dir, file_type = nil)
raise "invalid parameter: no path" if out_dir.nil? || out_dir.length < 1
tsv_file = out_dir + "audio_list.tsv"
pdf_file = out_dir + "audio_list.pdf"
logger.info "output audio_list tsv: #{tsv_file} pdf: #{pdf_file}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
items.each do |item|
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:acquired_at).value(item.acquired_at_string) if item.acquired_at_string
row.item(:bookstore).value(item.bookstore.name) if item.bookstore
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
items.each do |item|
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:acquired_at).value(item.acquired_at_string) if item.acquired_at_string
row.item(:bookstore).value(item.bookstore.name) if item.bookstore
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 93.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:carrier_type).value(item.manifestation.carrier_type.display_name.localize) if item.manifestation && item.manifestation.carrier_type
row.item(:shelf).value(item.shelf.display_name) if item.shelf
row.item(:ndc).value(item.manifestation.ndc) if item.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:carrier_type).value(item.manifestation.carrier_type.display_name.localize) if item.manifestation && item.manifestation.carrier_type
row.item(:shelf).value(item.shelf.display_name) if item.shelf
row.item(:ndc).value(item.manifestation.ndc) if item.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
['acquired_at_string', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at_string'],
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
['acquired_at', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at'],
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 26.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76