Method output_reminder_postal_card
has a Cognitive Complexity of 118 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_postal_card(file, reminder_lists, user, current_user)
logger.info "create_file=> #{file}"
report_path = EnjuTrunk.report_path
report = ThinReports::Report.create do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_reminder_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_list_tsv(reminder_lists)
columns = [
[:checkout_id, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.checkout_id'],
[:title, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.original_title'],
[:call_number, 'activerecord.attributes.item.call_number'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_reminder_postal_card
has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_postal_card(file, reminder_lists, user, current_user)
logger.info "create_file=> #{file}"
report_path = EnjuTrunk.report_path
report = ThinReports::Report.create do
Method output_reminder_letter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_letter(file, reminder_lists, user, current_user)
logger.info "create_file=> #{file}"
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('reminder_letter.tlf')
report.layout.config.list(:list) do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File reminder_list.rb
has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ReminderList < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :item_identifier, :status, :mail_sent_at
default_scope :order => 'reminder_lists.id DESC'
Method output_reminder_list_tsv
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_list_tsv(reminder_lists)
columns = [
[:checkout_id, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.checkout_id'],
[:title, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.original_title'],
[:call_number, 'activerecord.attributes.item.call_number'],
Method output_reminder_letter
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_letter(file, reminder_lists, user, current_user)
logger.info "create_file=> #{file}"
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('reminder_letter.tlf')
report.layout.config.list(:list) do
Method output_reminder_list_pdf
has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_list_pdf(reminder_lists)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('reminder_list.tlf')
# set page_num
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Method output_reminder_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_list_pdf(reminder_lists)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('reminder_list.tlf')
# set page_num
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while address.length > max_column
address.length.times { |i|
cnt += 0.5 if address[i] =~ /^[\s0-9A-Za-z]+$/
cnt += 1 unless address[i] =~ /^[\s0-9A-Za-z]+$/
if cnt.to_f >= max_column or address[i+1].nil? or address[i] =~ /^[\n]+$/
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while name.length > max_column
name.length.times { |i|
cnt += 0.5 if name[i] =~ /^[\s0-9A-Za-z]+$/
cnt += 1 unless name[i] =~ /^[\s0-9A-Za-z]+$/
if cnt.to_f >= max_column or name[i+1].nil? or name[i] =~ /^[\n]+$/
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 110.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:item_identifier).value(reminder_list.checkout.item.item_identifier) if reminder_list.checkout.item.item_identifier
row.item(:title).value(reminder_list.checkout.item.manifestation.original_title) if reminder_list.checkout.item.manifestation.original_title
row.item(:due_date).value(reminder_list.checkout.due_date) if reminder_list.checkout.due_date
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:item_identifier).value(reminder_list.checkout.item.item_identifier) if reminder_list.checkout.item.item_identifier
row.item(:title).value(reminder_list.checkout.item.manifestation.original_title) if reminder_list.checkout.item.manifestation.original_title
row.item(:due_date).value(reminder_list.checkout.due_date) if reminder_list.checkout.due_date
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76