Showing 1,155 of 1,155 total issues
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
check_can_access_purchase_request
if @user
@purchase_request = @user.purchase_requests.find(params[:id])
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_with_params
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.create_with_params(params, has_role_id)
logger.debug "create_with_params start."
user = User.new
user.assign_attributes(params, :as => :admin)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method new
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
if user_signed_in?
unless current_user.has_role?('Librarian')
access_denied; return
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method index
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
sort = User.set_sort(params[:sort_by], params[:order])
page = params[:page] || 1
role = current_user.try(:role) || Role.default_role
@search = User.search do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete_record
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_record(error_msgs, item, manifestation, series_statement)
deleted_item =
deleted_item_identifier =
deleted_manifestation =
deleted_manifestation_title =
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_item_register_tsv
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
['acquired_at_string', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at_string'],
Method get_unable_list_pdf
has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_unable_list_pdf(users, sort)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('userlist.tlf')
# set page_num
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
Method update
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
if params[:manifestation][:identifiers_attributes]
params[:manifestation][:identifiers_attributes].each do |key, identifier_attributes|
if identifier_attributes[:body].blank?
params[:manifestation][:identifiers_attributes]["#{key}"][:_destroy] = 1
Method create
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
LossItem.transaction do
flash[:notice] = ""
@loss_item = LossItem.new(params[:loss_item])
if params[:user_number]
Class Sheet
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Sheet
def self.new_from_rows(rows)
new do |obj|
obj.rows = rows
end
Method get_manifestation_list_separated_column_count
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_manifestation_list_separated_column_count(manifestation_ids, field_key, outer_cache = {})
field, field_ext = field_key.split(/\./, 2)
case field_ext
when /\Aother_title(?:_type|_transcription|_alternativ|_transcription|_alternativee)?\z/
Method generate_non_arrival_list
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.generate_non_arrival_list(start_at, end_at)
# generate order list
logger.debug "self.generate_non_arrival_list start_at=#{start_at} end_at=#{end_at}"
order_lists = OrderList.where(:ordered_at => start_at.beginning_of_day..end_at.end_of_day)
Method index
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def index
query = params[:query].to_s.strip
per_page = Item.default_per_page
@count = {}
if user_signed_in?
Method build_select2
has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def build_select2(selector_id, selector_name, collection, selected_id, options)
include_blank = options[:include_blank] || false
alt_display = options.has_key?(:alt_display) ? options[:alt_display] : true
width = options[:width] || 300
select_attribute = options[:select_attribute] || :v
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:carrier_type).value(item.manifestation.carrier_type.display_name.localize) if item.manifestation && item.manifestation.carrier_type
row.item(:shelf).value(item.shelf.display_name) if item.shelf
row.item(:ndc).value(item.manifestation.ndc) if item.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
report.page.list(:list).add_row do |row|
row.item(:library).value(item.shelf.library.display_name.localize) if item.shelf && item.shelf.library
row.item(:carrier_type).value(item.manifestation.carrier_type.display_name.localize) if item.manifestation && item.manifestation.carrier_type
row.item(:shelf).value(item.shelf.display_name) if item.shelf
row.item(:ndc).value(item.manifestation.ndc) if item.manifestation
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 82.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function minicolors
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
minicolors: function(method, data) {
switch(method) {
// Destroy the control
Method make_audio_list_tsv
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
[:carrier_type, 'activerecord.models.carrier_type'],
[:shelf, 'activerecord.models.shelf'],
Method monthly_report
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def monthly_report
yyyymm = params[:library_report][:yyyymm]
library_ids = params[:library]
begin
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('monthly_library_report.tlf')
Method new
has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new
if Shelf.real.blank?
flash[:notice] = t('item.create_shelf_first')
redirect_to libraries_url
return