Showing 1,155 of 1,155 total issues
Method suggestions
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def suggestions
suggestions = raw_suggestions
return nil unless suggestions.is_a?(Array)
suggestions.each_slice(2).inject({}) do |hash, (key, val)|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method check_data_is_numeric
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def check_data_is_numeric(field_value, field_name, options = {:mode => 'create'})
if options[:mode] == "delete"
return nil if field_value.nil? or field_value.blank?
end
return nil unless field_value
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method logic_adapter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def logic_adapter
case
when LOGIC_ALL.include?(@index)
raise AdapterError unless %w[ALL ANY = EXACT ^].include?(@relation)
when LOGIC_ANY.include?(@index)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def state_facet(state, current_states, facet)
string = ''
current = true if current_states.include?(state)
string << "<strong>" if current
string << link_to("#{t('activerecord.attributes.nacsis_user_request.state_names')[state.state]} (" + facet.count.to_s + ")", url_for(params.merge(:page => nil, :state => state.state, :view => nil)))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def request_type_facet(request_type, current_request_types, facet)
string = ''
current = true if current_request_types.include?(request_type)
string << "<strong>" if current
string << link_to("#{t('activerecord.attributes.nacsis_user_request.request_type_names')[request_type.request_type]} (" + facet.count.to_s + ")", url_for(params.merge(:page => nil, :request_type => request_type.request_type, :view => nil)))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
print_log "--#{index}-- START to update Manifestation(#{manifestation.id}) IDENTIFIER: #{manifestation.identifier} ISBN: #{manifestation.isbn}"
catalog = Catalog.where(:display_name => 'NACSIS UPDATE', :name => 'NACSIS UPDATE', :nacsis_identifier => 'NACSIS UPDATE').first_or_create
manifestation.update_attribute('catalog_id', catalog.id)
begin
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
print_log "--#{index}-- START to update Manifestation(#{manifestation.id}) IDENTIFIER: #{manifestation.identifier} NBN: #{manifestation.nbn}"
#TODO
catalog = Catalog.where(:display_name => 'NACSIS UPDATE', :name => 'NACSIS UPDATE', :nacsis_identifier => 'NACSIS UPDATE').first_or_create
manifestation.update_attribute('catalog_id', catalog.id)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 50.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function insertValue
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
insertValue: function(input, value) {
input = (input.jquery ? input : $(input));
var field = input[0];
var newValue = input.val();
var range = [newValue.length, newValue.length];
Function continuation_for_the_fucking_khtml_browser
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Calendar.continuation_for_the_fucking_khtml_browser = function() {
var w = self.element.offsetWidth;
var h = self.element.offsetHeight;
self.element.style.display = "none";
var valign = opts.substr(0, 1);
Function showMonthsCombo
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Calendar.showMonthsCombo = function () {
var cal = Calendar._C;
if (!cal) {
return false;
}
Method perform
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
user_file = UserFile.new(user)
# get data
query = Marshal.load(dumped_query)
Function _getIERange
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_getIERange: function(field) {
field.focus();
var selectionRange = document.selection.createRange().duplicate();
// Use two ranges: before and selection
var beforeRange = this._getIETextRange(field);
Method utl_group
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def utl_group # book only
results = []
title_type = TitleType.find_by_name('UTL')
utl_titles = @manifestation.manifestation_titles.where('work_has_titles.title_type_id' => title_type.id)
utl_titles.each do |title|
Method make_export_new_item_list_pdf
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_export_new_item_list_pdf(items)
return false if items.blank?
report = EnjuTrunk.new_book_list('new_item_list')
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
Method perform
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def perform
fn = "#{file_name}.#{file_type}"
user_file = UserFile.new(user)
url = nil
logger.error "SQL start at #{Time.now}"
Method create_pdf_sheet_custom
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_pdf_sheet_custom(custom_barcodes)
dir_base = "#{Rails.root}/private/system/barcode_list/#{self.id}/original/"
FileUtils.mkdir_p(dir_base) unless FileTest.exist?(dir_base)
#filename = "barcode#{Time.now.strftime('%s')}.pdf"
filename = "barcode.pdf"
Method set_query
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.set_query(query = nil, birth = nil, add = nil)
date_of_birth = nil
# query
query = query.to_s
query = query.gsub("-", "") if query
Method render_mode
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render_mode(mode)
case mode
when 'barcode'
barcode = Barby::QrCode.new(@manifestation.id)
send_data(barcode.to_svg, :disposition => 'inline', :type => 'image/svg+xml')
Method show
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def show
@user = current_user
if params[:filename]
find_and_send_user_file
Method process_article_data
has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def process_article_data(import_textresult, origin_datas, sheet, textfile, numbering)
check_article_datas_has_necessary_field(origin_datas, sheet)
attrs = article_attributes(origin_datas, sheet)
item, mode, error_msg = find_same_item(attrs, sheet.manifestation_type)