Showing 1,155 of 1,155 total issues
File items_controller.rb
has 415 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class ItemsController < ApplicationController
authorize_function
add_breadcrumb "I18n.t('activerecord.models.item')", 'items_path'
add_breadcrumb "I18n.t('page.new', :model => I18n.t('activerecord.models.item'))", 'new_item_path', :only => [:new, :create]
add_breadcrumb "I18n.t('page.editing', :model => I18n.t('activerecord.models.item'))", 'edit_item_path(params[:id])', :only => [:edit, :update]
Method get_unable_list_pdf
has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_unable_list_pdf(users, sort)
report = EnjuTrunk.new_report('userlist.tlf')
# set page_num
report.events.on :page_create do |e|
e.page.item(:page).value(e.page.no)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File manifestations_helper.rb
has 411 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module ManifestationsHelper
def resource_title(manifestation, action)
string = LibraryGroup.site_config.display_name.localize.dup
unless action == ('index' or 'new')
if manifestation.try(:original_title)
Method output_columns
has 146 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_columns(wbstyles, sheet, conditions, cols)
merge_style = wbstyles.add_style :font_name => Setting.item_statistics_print_excelx.fontname, :alignment => {:horizontal => :center, :vertical => :center}
if cols.length > 0
# 1行目
if conditions.aggregation_first.present?
File resource_import.rb
has 408 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'roo'
require File.join(File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__)), 'import_book')
require File.join(File.expand_path(File.dirname(__FILE__)), 'import_article')
class ResourceImport < EnjuTrunk::ResourceAdapter::Base
include EnjuTrunk::ImportBook
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 38: // up arrow
if ($(event.target).is('.' + options.linkHover)) {
var prevLink = $(event.target).parent().prev().find('a:eq(0)');
if (prevLink.size() > 0) {
$(event.target).trigger('mouseout');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 150.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 40: // down arrow
if ($(event.target).is('.' + options.linkHover)) {
var nextLink = $(event.target).parent().next().find('a:eq(0)');
if (nextLink.size() > 0) {
$(event.target).trigger('mouseout');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 150.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method export_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.export_tsv(expenses)
dir_base = "#{Rails.root}/private/system"
out_dir = "#{dir_base}/expense/"
tsv_file = out_dir + "expenses.tsv"
FileUtils.mkdir_p(out_dir) unless FileTest.exist?(out_dir)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_reminder_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_reminder_list_tsv(reminder_lists)
columns = [
[:checkout_id, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.checkout_id'],
[:title, 'activerecord.attributes.reminder_list.original_title'],
[:call_number, 'activerecord.attributes.item.call_number'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method make_audio_list_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_audio_list_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:library, 'activerecord.models.library'],
[:carrier_type, 'activerecord.models.carrier_type'],
[:shelf, 'activerecord.models.shelf'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method import_for_incremental_synchronization!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def import_for_incremental_synchronization!(dump)
last_processed = current_proccessing = nil
item_attributes = nil
# レコード毎の履歴
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method do_numbering
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.do_numbering(name, is_save = true, options = {})
counter = 10
n = nil
number = ''
Numbering.transaction do
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method bestreader
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bestreader
if params[:opac] and params[:search_date_first].blank? and params[:search_date_last].blank?
@start_d = (Date.today - 2.weeks).to_s
@end_d = Date.today.to_s
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method prepare_options
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def prepare_options
@subject_types = SubjectType.all
@carrier_types = CarrierType.all
@sub_carrier_types = SubCarrierType.all
@manifestation_types = ManifestationType.all
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 35 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update
if params[:item][:claim_attributes]
if params[:item][:claim_attributes][:claim_type_id].blank? && params[:item][:claim_attributes][:note].blank?
params[:item][:claim_attributes][:_destroy] = 1
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setup
has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Calendar.setup = function (params) {
function param_default(pname, def) { if (typeof params[pname] == "undefined") { params[pname] = def; } };
param_default("inputField", null);
param_default("displayArea", null);
Method make_item_register_tsv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.make_item_register_tsv(tsvfile, items)
columns = [
[:bookstore, 'activerecord.models.bookstore'],
['item_identifier', 'activerecord.attributes.item.item_identifier'],
['acquired_at_string', 'activerecord.attributes.item.acquired_at_string'],
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method hide_item?
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def hide_item?(show_all = false, item)
unless user_signed_in? and current_user.has_role?('Librarian') and SystemConfiguration.get("manifestation.show_all")
if @removed
return true unless item.circulation_status.name == "Removed"
else
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method output_excelx
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.output_excelx(output_data, filename = nil)
require 'axlsx'
# initialize
if filename.present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create
@manifestation = Manifestation.new(params[:manifestation])
@original_manifestation = Manifestation.where(:id => params[:manifestation_id]).first
if @manifestation.respond_to?(:post_to_scribd)
@manifestation.post_to_scribd = true if params[:manifestation][:post_to_scribd] == "1"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"