Method parse_tags
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_tags(tags)
ary = []
%i[included excluded].each do |type|
next if tags[type].nil?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Cyclomatic complexity for parse_tags is too high. [11/7] Open
def parse_tags(tags)
ary = []
%i[included excluded].each do |type|
next if tags[type].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one. Blocks that are calls to builtin iteration methods (e.g. `ary.map{...}) also add one, others are ignored.
def each_child_node(*types) # count begins: 1
unless block_given? # unless: +1
return to_enum(__method__, *types)
children.each do |child| # each{}: +1
next unless child.is_a?(Node) # unless: +1
yield child if types.empty? || # if: +1, ||: +1
types.include?(child.type)
end
self
end # total: 6
Perceived complexity for parse_tags is too high. [11/8] Open
def parse_tags(tags)
ary = []
%i[included excluded].each do |type|
next if tags[type].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method has too many lines. [13/10] Open
def parse_tags(tags)
ary = []
%i[included excluded].each do |type|
next if tags[type].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be allowed. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
You can set constructs you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', 'heredoc', and 'method_call'. Each construct
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
and IgnoredMethods
configuration is
deprecated and only kept for backwards compatibility.
Please use AllowedMethods
and AllowedPatterns
instead.
By default, there are no methods to allowed.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc', 'method_call']
def m
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
<<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
foo( # +1
1,
2
)
end # 6 points
Method parse_keywords
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_keywords(keywords)
%i[included excluded].map do |type|
next if keywords[type].nil?
keywords[type]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Assignment Branch Condition size for parse_tags is too high. [<6, 19, 11> 22.76/17] Open
def parse_tags(tags)
ary = []
%i[included excluded].each do |type|
next if tags[type].nil?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ABC_Software_Metric.
Interpreting ABC size:
- <= 17 satisfactory
- 18..30 unsatisfactory
- > 30 dangerous
You can have repeated "attributes" calls count as a single "branch".
For this purpose, attributes are any method with no argument; no attempt
is meant to distinguish actual attr_reader
from other methods.
Example: CountRepeatedAttributes: false (default is true)
# `model` and `current_user`, referenced 3 times each,
# are each counted as only 1 branch each if
# `CountRepeatedAttributes` is set to 'false'
def search
@posts = model.active.visible_by(current_user)
.search(params[:q])
@posts = model.some_process(@posts, current_user)
@posts = model.another_process(@posts, current_user)
render 'pages/search/page'
end
This cop also takes into account AllowedMethods
(defaults to []
)
And AllowedPatterns
(defaults to []
)
Align .map
with tags[type][subtype]
on line 60. Open
.map { |word| word.include?(' ') ? "\"#{word}\"" : word }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned (default)
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Align .map
with tags[type][subtype]
on line 60. Open
.map { |word| type == :excluded ? word.prepend('-') : word }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned (default)
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Align .map
with tags[type][subtype]
on line 60. Open
.map { |word| word.prepend("#{subtype}:") }
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the indentation of the method name part in method calls that span more than one line.
Example: EnforcedStyle: aligned (default)
# bad
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
# good
Thing.a
.b
.c
Example: EnforcedStyle: indented
# good
while myvariable
.b
# do something
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: indentedrelativeto_receiver
# good
while myvariable
.a
.b
# do something
end
# good
myvariable = Thing
.a
.b
.c
Missing top-level documentation comment for class Search
. Open
class Search
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, constant definitions or constant visibility declarations.
The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.
Example:
# bad
class Person
# ...
end
module Math
end
# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
# ...
end
# allowed
# Class without body
class Person
end
# Namespace - A namespace can be a class or a module
# Containing a class
module Namespace
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
# ...
end
end
# Containing constant visibility declaration
module Namespace
class Private
end
private_constant :Private
end
# Containing constant definition
module Namespace
Public = Class.new
end
# Macro calls
module Namespace
extend Foo
end
Example: AllowedConstants: ['ClassMethods']
# good
module A
module ClassMethods
# ...
end
end