Sign upLogin

NUBIC/surveyor

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 658 of 658 total issues

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                hit = (selectee.left > x1 && selectee.right < x2 && selectee.top > y1 && selectee.bottom < y2);
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js on lines 11189..11189

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

                hit = ( !(selectee.left > x2 || selectee.right < x1 || selectee.top > y2 || selectee.bottom < y1) );
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js on lines 11191..11191

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

        this._disabledInputs = $.map(this._disabledInputs,
            function(value) { return (value === target ? null : value); }); // delete entry
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
lib/assets/javascripts/surveyor/jquery-ui-1.10.0.custom.js on lines 3406..3407

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 45.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method build_and_set has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def build_and_set(context, r)
    if !r[:section_header].blank?
      context[:survey_section].questions.build({:display_type => "label", :text => r[:section_header], :display_order => context[:survey_section].questions.size})
      Surveyor::RedcapParser.rake_trace "label_ "
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method to_formatted_s has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def to_formatted_s
        return "" if answer.nil? || answer.response_class.nil?
        return case t = answer.response_class.to_sym
               when :string, :text, :integer, :float
                 send("#{t}_value".to_sym).to_s
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/response_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method default_args has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def default_args
        self.is_mandatory ||= false
        self.display_type ||= "default"
        self.pick ||= "none"
        self.data_export_identifier ||= Surveyor::Common.normalize(text)
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/question_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method default_args has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def default_args
        self.is_exclusive ||= false
        self.display_type ||= "default"
        self.response_class ||= "answer"
        self.short_text ||= text
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/answer_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method has_blank_value? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def has_blank_value?(hash)
          return true if hash["answer_id"].blank?
          return false if (q = Question.find_by_id(hash["question_id"])) and q.pick == "one"
          hash.any?{|k,v| v.is_a?(Array) ? v.all?{|x| x.to_s.blank?} : v.to_s.blank?}
        end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/response_set_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method unparse has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def unparse(dsl)
    with_defaults = ValidationCondition.new
    attrs = self.attributes.delete_if{|k,v| with_defaults[k] == v or %w(created_at updated_at operator rule_key id validation_id).include? k}.symbolize_keys!
    dsl << "  " if validation.answer.question.part_of_group?
    dsl << "    condition"
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/unparser.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method missing_columns has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def missing_columns(r)
      missing = []
      missing << "choices_or_calculations" unless r.map(&:to_s).include?("choices_or_calculations") or r.map(&:to_s).include?("choices_calculations_or_slider_labels")
      missing << "text_validation_type" unless r.map(&:to_s).include?("text_validation_type") or r.map(&:to_s).include?("text_validation_type_or_show_slider_number")
      missing += (static_required_columns - r.map(&:to_s))
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method all_dependencies has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def all_dependencies(question_ids = nil)
        arr = dependencies(question_ids).partition{|d| d.is_met?(self) }
        {
          :show => arr[0].map{|d| d.question_group_id.nil? ? "q_#{d.question_id}" : "g_#{d.question_group_id}"},
          :hide => arr[1].map{|d| d.question_group_id.nil? ? "q_#{d.question_id}" : "g_#{d.question_group_id}"}
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/response_set_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method edit has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def edit
      # @response_set is set in before_filter - set_response_set_and_render_context
      if @response_set
        @sections = SurveySection.where(survey_id: @response_set.survey_id).includes([:survey, {questions: [{answers: :question}, {question_group: :dependency}, :dependency]}])
        @section = (section_id_from(params) ? @sections.where(id: section_id_from(params)).first : @sections.first) || @sections.first
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/surveyor_controller_methods.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def split(text, position=nil)
        case position
        when :pre
          text.split("|",2)[0]
        when :post
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/answer_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/surveyor/models/question_methods.rb on lines 75..82

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    output << builder.text_field(response_class_to_method(options[:response_class]), input_html_options_with(choice, options[:response_class])) if %w(date datetime time float integer string other_and_string).include? options[:response_class]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/inputs/surveyor_check_boxes_input.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
app/inputs/surveyor_radio_input.rb on lines 14..14

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    output << builder.text_field(response_class_to_method(options[:response_class]), input_html_options_with(choice, options[:response_class])) if %w(date datetime time float integer string other_and_string).include? options[:response_class]
Severity: Minor
Found in app/inputs/surveyor_radio_input.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
app/inputs/surveyor_check_boxes_input.rb on lines 16..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def split(text, position=nil)
        case position
        when :pre
          text.split("|",2)[0]
        when :post
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/models/question_methods.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/surveyor/models/answer_methods.rb on lines 53..60

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    when "notes"
      self.attributes = {
        :response_class => "text",
        :text => "Notes",
        :display_order => context[:question].answers.size }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb on lines 203..208

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    when "text"
      self.attributes = {
        :response_class => "string",
        :text => "Text",
        :display_order => context[:question].answers.size }
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
lib/surveyor/redcap_parser.rb on lines 209..214

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language