Showing 28 of 28 total issues
Function find_package_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_package_data(where='.', package='',
exclude=standard_exclude,
exclude_directories=standard_exclude_directories,
only_in_packages=True,
show_ignored=False):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for pattern in exclude:
if (fnmatchcase(name, pattern)
or fn.lower() == pattern.lower()):
bad_name = True
if show_ignored:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for pattern in exclude_directories:
if (fnmatchcase(name, pattern)
or fn.lower() == pattern.lower()):
bad_name = True
if show_ignored:
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 64.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Os3List
has 25 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Os3List(Os3Item):
default_format = 'list'
_tuple_filters = None
_dict_filters = None
_sort = None # []
Entry
has 25 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Entry(Os3Item):
_stat = None
_type = None
path = ''
root = None
Function deep_scandir
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deep_scandir(path, deep=False, cls=None, filter=None, traverse_filter=None, exceptions=None):
filter = filter or (lambda x: True)
traverse_filter = traverse_filter or (lambda x: True)
for item in scandir(path, return_value=iter(()), exceptions=exceptions):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function pprint_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pprint_list(input_list):
# http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25026556/output-list-like-ls
(term_width, term_height) = get_terminal_size()
if len( str(input_list) ) <= term_width:
return ' '.join(input_list)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readlines
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def readlines(self, n=None, mode='r', buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@property
def mtime(self):
stat = self.stat()
if not stat:
return
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@property
def atime(self):
stat = self.stat()
if not stat:
return
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function bak_target_decorator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def bak_target_decorator(fn):
def decorator(src, dst=None, **kwargs):
src, dst = Entry(src), Entry(dst) if dst else dst
if dst and os.path.islink(dst.path) and os.path.realpath(dst.path) == os.path.realpath(src.path):
return
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function readline
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def readline(self, mode='r', buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True, opener=None,
Function read
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def read(self, n=None, mode=None, buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True,
Function write
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def write(self, data, mode=None, buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True, opener=None):
Function __new__
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
classes = cls.get_classes()
Dir, File = classes['Dir'], classes['File']
if cls != (cls.entry_class or Entry) or not args:
return Os3Item.__new__(cls)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function items_iterator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def items_iterator(items, depth=None):
for item in items:
yield item
if not isinstance(item, DataTree) or not depth:
continue
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _get_open
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _get_open(self, mode='r', buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True, opener=None):
Function open
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def open(self, mode='r', buffering=-1, encoding=None, errors=None, newline=None, closefd=True, opener=None):
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (fnmatchcase(name, pattern)
or fn.lower() == pattern.lower()):
bad_name = True
if show_ignored:
sys.stderr.write(
Function deep_scandir
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def deep_scandir(path, deep=False, cls=None, filter=None, traverse_filter=None, exceptions=None):