Assignment Branch Condition size for add_to_reactor is too high. [28.18/15] Open
def add_to_reactor
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
monitor.value = proc do
begin
read if monitor.readable?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method has too many lines. [21/10] Open
def add_to_reactor
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
monitor.value = proc do
begin
read if monitor.readable?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Assignment Branch Condition size for pump_buffer is too high. [21/15] Open
def pump_buffer
@mutex.synchronize do
written = 0
begin
written = inner.write_nonblock @buffer unless @buffer.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method pump_buffer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def pump_buffer
@mutex.synchronize do
written = 0
begin
written = inner.write_nonblock @buffer unless @buffer.empty?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method has too many lines. [14/10] Open
def pump_buffer
@mutex.synchronize do
written = 0
begin
written = inner.write_nonblock @buffer unless @buffer.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks if the length of a method exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable.
Cyclomatic complexity for pump_buffer is too high. [9/6] Open
def pump_buffer
@mutex.synchronize do
written = 0
begin
written = inner.write_nonblock @buffer unless @buffer.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for add_to_reactor is too high. [9/7] Open
def add_to_reactor
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
monitor.value = proc do
begin
read if monitor.readable?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Cyclomatic complexity for add_to_reactor is too high. [8/6] Open
def add_to_reactor
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
monitor.value = proc do
begin
read if monitor.readable?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.
An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.
Perceived complexity for pump_buffer is too high. [9/7] Open
def pump_buffer
@mutex.synchronize do
written = 0
begin
written = inner.write_nonblock @buffer unless @buffer.empty?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the
complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that
reason it considers when
nodes as something that doesn't add as much
complexity as an if
or a &&
. Except if it's one of those special
case
/when
constructs where there's no expression after case
. Then
the cop treats it as an if
/elsif
/elsif
... and lets all the when
nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop
considers else
nodes as adding complexity.
Example:
def my_method # 1
if cond # 1
case var # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
when 1 then func_one
when 2 then func_two
when 3 then func_three
when 4..10 then func_other
end
else # 1
do_something until a && b # 2
end # ===
end # 7 complexity points
Method add_to_reactor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_to_reactor
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
monitor.value = proc do
begin
read if monitor.readable?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Line is too long. [115/80] Open
rescue Errno::ECONNRESET, EOFError, Errno::ECONNABORTED, IOError # rubocop:disable Lint/ShadowedException
- Exclude checks
Use underscores(_) as decimal mark and separate every 3 digits with them. Open
data = inner.read_nonblock(16384)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for big numeric literals without _ between groups of digits in them.
Example:
# bad
1000000
1_00_000
1_0000
# good
1_000_000
1000
# good unless Strict is set
10_000_00 # typical representation of $10,000 in cents
Line is too long. [161/80] Open
# edge case: if monitor was readable this time, and the write buffer is empty, if we emptied the read buffer this time our block wouldn't run again
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [124/80] Open
@monitor = Reactor.selector.register(inner, :rw) # This can block if this is the main thread and the reactor is busy
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [100/80] Open
WebSocket.logger.debug { "Incoming data on #{inner}:\n#{data}" } if WebSocket.log_traffic?
- Exclude checks
Missing top-level class documentation comment. Open
class RawAdapter
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for missing top-level documentation of classes and modules. Classes with no body are exempt from the check and so are namespace modules - modules that have nothing in their bodies except classes, other modules, or constant definitions.
The documentation requirement is annulled if the class or module has a "#:nodoc:" comment next to it. Likewise, "#:nodoc: all" does the same for all its children.
Example:
# bad
class Person
# ...
end
# good
# Description/Explanation of Person class
class Person
# ...
end
Line is too long. [120/80] Open
WebSocket.logger.debug { "The buffer is now:\n#{@buffer}" } unless @buffer.empty? || !WebSocket.log_traffic?
- Exclude checks
Line is too long. [158/80] Open
WebSocket.logger.debug { "Pumped #{written} bytes of data from buffer to #{inner}:\n#{@buffer}" } unless @buffer.empty? || !WebSocket.log_traffic?
- Exclude checks
Prefer single-quoted strings when you don't need string interpolation or special symbols. Open
@buffer = ""
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if uses of quotes match the configured preference.
Example: EnforcedStyle: single_quotes (default)
# bad
"No special symbols"
"No string interpolation"
"Just text"
# good
'No special symbols'
'No string interpolation'
'Just text'
"Wait! What's #{this}!"
Example: EnforcedStyle: double_quotes
# bad
'Just some text'
'No special chars or interpolation'
# good
"Just some text"
"No special chars or interpolation"
"Every string in #{project} uses double_quotes"
Line is too long. [116/80] Open
monitor.interests = :rw unless monitor.closed? # keep the :w interest so that our block runs each time
- Exclude checks