OCA/server-tools

View on GitHub
base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function write has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

            def write(self, cr, uid, ids, vals, context=None, **kwargs):
Severity: Minor
Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Function create has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

                def create(self, cr, uid, vals, context=None, **kwargs):
    Severity: Minor
    Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py - About 35 mins to fix

      Function write has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def write(self, cr, uid, ids, vals, context=None):
      Severity: Minor
      Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py - About 35 mins to fix

        Function _field_validator_hook has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _field_validator_hook(self, cr, ids):
        
                def _wrap_create():
                    def create(self, cr, uid, vals, context=None, **kwargs):
                        model_pool = self.pool['ir.model']
        Severity: Minor
        Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py - About 35 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Function check_vals has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def check_vals(self, vals, model_name):
                validator_lines = self.env['ir.model.validator.line'].search([
                    ('model_id.model', '=', model_name),
                    ('field_id.name', 'in', vals.keys())])
                for validator_line in validator_lines:
        Severity: Minor
        Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py - About 25 mins to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def write(self, cr, uid, ids, vals, context=None):
                if isinstance(ids, (int, long)):
                    ids = [ids]
                res = super(IrModel, self).write(cr, uid, ids, vals, context=context)
                self._field_validator_hook(cr, ids)
        Severity: Major
        Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
        base_optional_quick_create/model.py on lines 60..65

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 68.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def create(self, cr, uid, vals, context=None):
                res_id = super(IrModel, self).create(
                    cr, uid, vals, context=context)
                self._field_validator_hook(cr, [res_id])
                return res_id
        Severity: Major
        Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
        base_optional_quick_create/model.py on lines 55..58

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 49.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
        Open

            def _register_hook(self, cr):
                self._field_validator_hook(cr, self.search(cr, SUPERUSER_ID, []))
                return super(IrModel, self)._register_hook(cr)
        Severity: Major
        Found in base_field_validator/models/ir_model.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
        base_optional_quick_create/model.py on lines 51..53

        Duplicated Code

        Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

        Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

        When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

        Tuning

        This issue has a mass of 39.

        We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

        The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

        If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

        See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

        Refactorings

        Further Reading

        There are no issues that match your filters.

        Category
        Status